The effect of capitation on GPs' referral decisions

In the Norwegian capitation trial, the payment system for general practitioners (GPs) has been changed; a practice allowance component has been replaced by a capitation component and the fee-per-item component constitutes a smaller part of a GPs practice income than previously. From the theoretical modelling of GPs' referral decisions, we predict that the replacement of the practice allowance by a capitation component will increase the rate of referrals to specialists. This hypothesis is supported by an exploratory empirical study with data from a sample of GPs participating in the experiment.     

Clinical guidelines of depression: a qualitative study of GPs' views

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines have become an increasingly familiar component of health care, although their passive dissemination does not ensure implementation. This study is concerned with general practitioners' (GPs) views of guideline implementation in general practice. It focuses specifically on their views about guidelines for the management of patients with depression. OBJECTIVE: To elicit and explore GPs' views about clinical guidelines for the management of depression, their use in practice, barriers to their use, and how best to implement guidelines. DESIGN: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of GPs. SETTING: General Practices across the Scottish Grampian region, and Northeast England. METHODS: Eleven GPs who had participated in a previous questionnaire based depression study were interviewed. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the "framework technique." RESULTS: Several participating GPs did not agree with recommendations of the current depression guidelines; some thought they were insufficiently flexible to use with the variety of patients they see. The volume of guidelines received, lack of time and resources (particularly mental health professionals for referrals) were seen as the main barriers to guideline use. CONCLUSIONS: A range of factors contributes to variability in compliance with guidelines for the management of depression. For guideline use to increase, GPs in this study said they would like to see more resources put in place; a reduction in the number of guidelines they receive; incorporation of guideline recommendations onto computer decision support systems; and regular audit and feedback to allow them to monitor their practice.     

Prevention and health promotion in clinical practice: the views of general practitioners in Europe

BACKGROUND: Disease prevention and health promotion are important tasks in the daily practice of all general practitioners (GPs). The objective of this study was to explore the knowledge and attitudes of European GPs in implementing evidence-based health promotion and disease prevention recommendations in primary care, to describe GPs' perceived barriers to implementing these recommendations and to assess how GPs' own health behaviors affect their work with their patients. METHODS: A postal multinational survey was carried out from June to December 2000 in a random sample of GPs listed from national colleges of each country. RESULTS: Eleven European countries participated in the study, giving a total of 2082 GPs. Although GPs believe they should advise preventive and health promotion activities, in practice, they are less likely to do so. About 56.02% of the GPs answered that carrying-out prevention and health promotion activities are difficult. The two most important barriers reported were heavy workload/lack of time and no reimbursement. Associations between personal health behaviour and attitudes to health promotion or activities in prevention were found. GPs who smoked felt less effective in helping patients to reduce tobacco consumption than non-smoking GPs (39.34% versus 48.18%, P < 0.01). GPs who exercised felt that they were more effective in helping patients to practice regular physical exercise than sedentary GPs (59.14% versus 49.70%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Significant gaps between GP's knowledge and practices persist in the use of evidence-based recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention in primary care.     

Attitudes and managing alcohol problems in general practice: an interaction analysis based on findings from a WHO collaborative study

AIMS: To determine if GPs' attitudes towards working with drinkers moderated the impact that training and support had on screening and brief intervention activity in routine practice. METHODS: Subjects were 340 GPs from four countries who were part of a World Health Organization randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of training and support in increasing screening and brief alcohol intervention. GPs' self-reported attitudes towards working with drinkers were measured with the Shortened Alcohol and Alcohol Problems Perception Questionnaire. RESULTS: Whereas training and support increased GPs' screening and brief intervention rates, it did so only for practitioners who already felt secure and committed in working with drinkers. Training and support did not improve attitudes towards working with drinkers and, moreover, worsened the attitudes of those who were already insecure and uncommitted. CONCLUSIONS: To enhance the involvement of GPs in the management of alcohol problems, interventions that increase both actual experience and address practitioners' attitudes is required. Such support could take the form of on-site support agents and facilitators.     

Preventive service delivery: a new insight into French general practice

OBJECTIVE: The importance of prevention is increasingly recognised in most developed countries. General practitioners (GPs) have got a key role to play in this domain in primary care. But, the research evidence still concludes that GPs' preventive activities remain most of the time insufficient. The aim of our study was to contribute to this debate in adopting a more broad view of prevention-related activities to better understand the GPs practice in this matter. Our study was undertaken to measure the part of prevention-related activity hidden in each of the morbid conditions (MC) seen by the doctors daily. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional study in a sample of 75 French GPs in the south suburb of Paris. We dropped the usual pre-established and limited list of specific preventive care activities to replace it with a list of 100 most common morbid conditions seen by the GPs in daily practice. The GPs were asked for each selected MC to rate on a five-item Likert scale the amount of primary and secondary prevention they generally offer during a patient visit. RESULTS: All MC confounded, secondary prevention reached an average score of 3.2 (inter-quartile interval 2.82-3.58). The intensity of primary prevention was somewhat lower, but far from being negligible. Its average score was 2.3 (inter-quartile interval of 1.86-2.73). If more than 50% of the GPs declare a low intensity of primary prevention activity or even no primary prevention activity at all in nearly 3/4 of the MC encountered in their daily practice, they also declare that they carry out a considerable amount of primary prevention or in some cases spend the entire patient visit to primary prevention for MC covering more than 25% of their daily activity. Also, even if a majority of GPs did not give clear-cut scores for secondary prevention for 2/3 of the MC, they declare a considerable amount of it for the remaining 1/3 which covers more than 25% of their activity. CONCLUSION: Our study was useful to offer a more realistic view of the real place of the prevention-related activities in the GPs daily primary care practice even if we assess neither the appropriateness nor the quality of these activities.     

Strategies to improve cancer screening in general practice: are guidelines the answer?

BACKGROUND: GPs are ideally placed to recommend appropriate cancer screening for their patients. However, opportunities to discuss screening are often missed and screening procedures are not always recommended in accordance with national policy. The development of clinical practice guidelines represents one strategy for improving cancer screening in general practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to ascertain Australian GPs' ratings of current clinical practice guidelines and their views of the likely usefulness of 18 strategies to improve cancer screening in general practice. METHOD: A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to a national random sample of 1271 GPs in May 1996. Responders rated the usefulness of each of eight clinical practice guidelines current at the time of the survey. They then rated the usefulness of each of 18 strategies for support of cancer screening. RESULTS: We received 855 completed questionnaires (a 67% response rate). There was greatest support for guidelines already available on breast and cervical cancer. The most popular strategy to improve cancer screening was seminars with experts in preventive care, rated as 'very useful' by 658 (77%), followed by NHMRC guidelines (597, 70%) and pamphlets for patients (587, 69%). There was less support for more innovative strategies including assessment and feedback (35%), case finding by nurse practitioners (11%) and academic detailing (10%). CONCLUSION: Responders indicated that strategies involving passive dissemination of information would be most useful for improving cancer screening in general practice. Identification of an effective combination of acceptable initiatives is needed.     

Management of lower urinary tract infection in women by Slovene GPs

BACKGROUND: Uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection (LUTI) is one of the most common infections treated in general practice. Although nationwide treatment guidelines for LUTI are increasingly available, most European countries, including Slovenia, have not yet set such guidelines. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to describe Slovene GPs' management of uncomplicated LUTIs and to analyse doctor and surgery characteristics that influence this management. METHOD: A written case vignette accompanied by open-ended questions regarding doctors' decisions (i.e. investigations and laboratory tests ordered, treatment options, advising sick leave, advice for treatment and follow-up procedures) and questions about doctor and surgery characteristics was sent to a representative sample of Slovene GPs. RESULTS: The response rate was 129/171 (75.4%). There were large variations in management of LUTI: 17.8% of GPs ordered various additional laboratory tests; 57% of GPs prescribed trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and 37% norfloxacin; 30% of GPs prescribed a drug for 10-14 days; and 53.5% of GPs put the patient on sick leave of 1-10 days duration. Doctors with heavier workloads and those who have to wait for laboratory results for >24 h ordered more additional investigations. CONCLUSIONS: Effective strategies for quality improvement are needed, together with practice guidelines. The influence of a heavier workload on management of LUTI and the impact of the accessibility of laboratory tests should be explored in future research.     

Use of guidelines in primary care--practitioners' perspectives

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Concern about the inadequate take-up of guidelines in general practice has concentrated on problems arising from the process of their development and implementation. However, these perspectives fail to take account of the needs, attitudes and problems of GPs themselves. In this study we aimed to identify barriers to the use of guidelines and opportunities for tackling them, from the point of view of the GP, so that future guideline development and policy could be more sensitive to the needs of GPs in the environment in which they work. METHOD: Twenty in-depth semi-structured interviews were audiotaped with GPs from within the Avon Health Authority area, representing GPs with different backgrounds and working environments. The transcribed data collected were analysed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Utilization of guideline information is complex. GPs' appraisals of the value of guidelines interact with prior knowledge and beliefs, practicalities of existing information storage and retrieval systems, and individual working practices. Conditions where guidelines are most likely to be referred to may be those either very rarely or very commonly presenting in general practice. Key issues for the uptake of guidelines in the consultation are: general preference for certain formats of presentation; reputability and ownership; use of guidelines in shared decision-making; scope for computer-based systems; and GPs' attitudes to time pressures on information-seeking in relation to tolerance of uncertainty. CONCLUSION: Local initiatives might usefully explore the possibilities of supporting development of guideline-retrieval systems customized for individual GPs or practices. Novel means of stimulating 'ownership' and demonstrating reputability should be sought. The analysis provides a framework for understanding the complexities of the processes of GPs' use of guidelines in practice which can be useful in explaining the results of trials of guideline effectiveness. Guideline implementation occurs in the context of conflicting pressures for clinical autonomy and professional standardization and quality improvement.      

Factors associated with bulk billing: experience from a general practitioners' survey in New South Wales

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether some demographic and practice characteristics of general practitioners (GPs) are associated with the use of bulk billing. METHODS: A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted in late 2002 with a 15% stratified random sample, based on sex and area of practice, of currently practising GPs in New South Wales. Multinomial logistic regression was used to look at GPs' characteristics associated with their self-reported use of bulk billing. RESULTS: Of the 494 GPs who participated in the study, 44% bulk billed for all patient consultations, 34% for selective patients, while 22% did not bulk bill for any patient. Multivariate analysis revealed that GPs practising in metropolitan areas were six times more likely to bulk bill for all patients compared with GPs in rural areas (OR 6.7, 95% CI 3.8-11.9). Overseas-trained GPs were twice as likely to bulk bill for all patients compared with locally trained GPs (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.3). The likelihood of bulk billing for all patients also increased with an increase in GPs' caseload. CONCLUSIONS: This paper discusses some of the policy and programmatic implications of the changing pattern of bulk billing. Special efforts are needed to provide increased practice support for GPs in rural and remote areas in order to ensure affordable and accessible GP services.     

Why do GPs perform investigations?: The medical and social agendas in arranging back X-rays

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the most important medical and psychosocial reasons GPs report for requesting back X-rays. METHODS: All GPs in a single health district were mailed a questionnaire and asked to document their reasons for requesting back X-rays. RESULTS: A total of 166/236 (70%) of GPs responded. There were 445 comments (mean 2.7 per doctor): 319 (72%) were medical indications (mean 1.9 per doctor) and 126 (28%) psychosocial reasons (mean 0.8 per doctor). GPs' medical criteria for requesting back X-rays were mainly in line with current guidelines. The most common psychosocial reasons were patient satisfaction (17%), work related (14%) and reassurance (8%). CONCLUSION: GPs' reported medical criteria for arranging back X-rays are mainly 'appropriate', but psychosocial reasons-especially patient satisfaction and reassurance-are also likely to be important factors. If psycho-social agendas are important in ordering investigations, then clinical guidelines which discuss only medical criteria may not be effective in reducing 'inappropriate' investigations.      

Integrating clinical practice guidelines into daily practice: impact of an interactive workshop on drafting of a written action plan for asthma patients

INTRODUCTION: Written action plans (WAPs) are instructions that enable asthmatics to manage their condition appropriately and are recommended by current asthma clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). However, general practitioners (GPs) rarely draft WAPs for their patients. An interactive, case-based workshop for asthma, combined with an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), was developed to increase GPs' knowledge and use of WAPs in Québec. METHODS: The study compared 24 GPs receiving an OSCE preworkshop and 12 months post-workshop (group 1) with 16 GPs receiving an OSCE preworkshop and at 6 and 12 months post-workshop (group 2). Participants received no feedback on their OSCE performance. During the workshop, which presented a preformatted tool to aid drafting of the WAPs, all 40 GPs worked individually and in small groups to answer questions on a hypothetical clinical case and then discussed the responses with a facilitator and an asthma specialist. RESULTS: Only group 2 GPs showed a significant improvement in knowledge of WAPs 12 months post-workshop (p = .01). The likelihood of prescribing WAPs to patients increased in group 2 to a degree approaching statistical significance (p = .070), and there was a borderline nonsignificant trend for prescribing practice to improve more among group 2 GPs than among group 1 GPs (p = .052). There was also a nonsignificant trend for 6-month OSCE to increase attendance at the 12-month OSCE. DISCUSSION: An interactive workshop employing a preformatted WAP tool and a reinforcing OSCE at 6 months yielded improved knowledge of WAPs at 1 year. Although originally developed as a form of evaluation, the OSCE appears to have formative value even when correction is not provided and may increase the effectiveness of continuing medical education interventions to enhance CPG implementation.     

Hypertension management in general practice.

The views of 542 general practitioners (GPs) and 64 consultant physicians about the management of patients with hypertension in general practice were sought by postal questionnaire. 325 (60%) of the GPs and 45 (70%) of the consultant physicians completed the questionnaire. For a 40-year-old man with no other cardiovascular risk factors most general practitioners would intervene with drugs at blood pressure levels specified in published guidelines, whereas many local consultants and older GPs would consider drug treatment at lower levels. About 75% of GPs, compared with 87% of consultants, would suggest drug treatment in a woman of 70 years with a BP of 180/100 mmHg. Although consultants tended to expect GPs to order more tests when investigating a patient with hypertension than the GPs actually did, both GPs and consultants would order similar types of investigations apart from imaging. Consultants had different expectations about the frequency with which general practitioners should record patients' blood pressure and the GPs' ability to prevent cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. Many older GPs and consultants seem to have unrealistic expectations of the value of treating patients with hypertension.     

GP survey response rate: a miscellany of influencing factors

BACKGROUND: GP response to surveys is acknowledged to vary widely. The minimization of non-response bias and the generalizability of findings are fundamental research issues. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the factors that had influenced GPs' decisions to complete a questionnaire. METHODS: A short questionnaire eliciting GPs' views on minor ailment consultations was sent to 759 GPs from eight English health authorities. The response rate was 54.5%. Factors perceived by respondents to have influenced their decision to complete this questionnaire were also assessed. Subsequently, a feedback summary, together with a short evaluation form, was sent to those GPs requesting it. RESULTS: The response from GPs located in the London area was significantly lower than that from those elsewhere. Respondents identified questionnaire length and the originating institution as the two major factors influencing their decision to return the survey. A single mailing of the evaluation form yielded a response rate of >60% predominantly positive comments. CONCLUSION: Many factors influence a GP's decision to complete a survey. The effect of location has, to date, largely been ignored. Furthermore, this study suggested feedback to be an important issue. Within health services research, all possible factors need to be considered to maximize response, reduce non-response bias and ultimately facilitate the dissemination of findings.     

General practitioners' uptake of clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: To explain recent rapid audited change in the uptake of locally implemented, evidence-based clinical guidelines for asthma and angina in primary care. METHODS: A case study of primary care in two matched, adjacent districts in Northern England, focusing on a stratified random sample of 49 general practitioners (GPs) from eight primary care groups. Data were collected from three cycles of mainly qualitative interviews carried out at six-monthly intervals, before and after the dissemination of local guidelines and after audit data were gathered. Interviews examined attitudes, awareness and impact of locally disseminated asthma and angina guidelines and the subsequent audit. Audit data on guideline uptake were also available from a parallel study. RESULTS: The rapid increase in guideline uptake observed in both intervention and control groups was not explained by individual practitioners or practice factors. The findings are attributed to GPs' awareness of policies for evidence-based medicine, of new health service institutions and of the clinical governance activities of primary care groups. Behaviour change reflects GPs' decisions about what to record in case notes as well as their clinical decisions, so that findings may reflect changing perceptions about accountability rather than about preferred treatment regimes. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline production and dissemination is best seen in the broader context of policy change. Studies of guideline implementation should report before and after data and incorporate significant qualitative components in order to identify important contextual factors.     

The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France

Implementation of colorectal cancer (CRC) mass screening is a public health priority. Obtaining the involvement of general practitioners (GPs) is crucial for ensuring participation by the general public. This study elicited GPs' reasons for promoting CRC screening. The method used was discrete choice modeling. Questionnaires with a set of pairs of hypothetical screening scenarios were sent to 700 GPs. Factors influencing GPs' screening practice were found to be: the effectiveness of the screening program, the proportion of false negatives and false positives, and their remuneration. Hence improving screening test sensitivity and setting up specific remuneration for conducting screening would help to increase GPs' participation in CRC screening in France.