Anticoagulant-free Genius haemodialysis using low molecular weight heparin-coated circuits.

BACKGROUND: Regional citrate anticoagulation or saline flushes are often used in haemodialysis patients at high risk of bleeding. In an alternative approach we evaluated the effects of covalent circuit coating with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for intermittent haemodialysis. METHODS: In vitro, we compared the thrombogenicity of an uncoated polyvinylchloride (PVC) tubing set with LMWH-coated tubing (AOThel) and a reference tubing with end-point attached heparin coating (Carmeda Bioactive surface) under dynamic blood contact. In vivo, five chronic haemodialysis patients were studied using the Genius dialysis system and F60S filters. Each patient underwent three dialysis sessions separated by a standard haemodialysis each: (1) standard dialysis (uncoated circuit and regular dalteparin dosage), (2) dialysis with LMWH-coated circuit and regular dalteparin dosage and (3) dialysis with a completely LMWH-coated circuit without anticoagulant use. RESULTS: In vitro, both coated tubings showed significantly reduced thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complex levels compared with PVC. The reference coating (Carmeda) released substantial antifactor Xa (antiXa) activity into the plasma. The LMWH coating (AOThel) released low antiXa activity only during the initial rinsing. In vivo, all dialysis sessions were well tolerated and completed without major clotting. Antithrombin levels and platelet counts were similar in all groups. P-selectin and D-dimer levels increased similarly in all groups. TAT levels were comparable in all groups during the first 3 h and significantly increased in the anticoagulant-free group after the fourth hour. CONCLUSIONS: LMWH surface coating reduces thrombogenicity in vitro without releasing significant amounts of heparin from the surface. In vivo, anticoagulant-free haemodialysis using a completely LMWH-coated circuit is feasible and safe in stable chronic dialysis patients with normal coagulation.     

A single bolus of a low molecular weight heparin to patients on haemodialysis depletes lipoprotein lipase stores and retards triglyceride clearing.

BACKGROUND: Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are increasingly used during haemodialysis (HD) to prevent clotting in the extracorporeal devices. It has been suggested that LMWH release endothelial-bound lipoprotein lipase (LPL) less efficiently than unfractionated heparin (UFH) does and thereby cause less disturbance of lipid metabolism. Evidence from in vitro studies and from animal experiments indicate, however, that both types of heparin preparations have the same ability to release endothelial LPL, but LMWH are less effective in preventing uptake and degradation of LPL in the liver. Model studies in humans indicate that LMWH cause as much depletion of LPL stores and impaired lipolysis of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins as UFH does. METHODS: Two anticoagulant regimes based on present clinical practice were compared in nine HD patients. UFH was administered as a primed infusion, whereas the LMWH (dalteparin) was given only as a single bolus pre-dialysis. Blood was sampled regularly for LPL activity and TG. RESULTS: LPL activity in blood was significantly lower during the dialysis with dalteparin. To explore the remaining activity at the endothelium, a bolus of UFH was given after 3 h of dialysis. The bolus brought out about the same amount of LPL, regardless of whether UFH or dalteparin had been used during dialysis. The increase in TG was significantly higher during dialysis with dalteparin. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that a single bolus of dalteparin pre-dialysis interferes with the LPL system as much as, or more than an infusion of UFH does.     

Anticoagulation intensity sufficient for haemodialysis does not prevent activation of coagulation and platelets.

BACKGROUND: A single bolus of dalteparin at the start of haemodialysis (HD) may prevent clot formation, but subclinical activation of platelets and coagulation may still occur. Consequently, the relationship between clinical clotting events and activation markers of platelets and coagulation before and during HD is of interest. METHODS: The effect of tapered doses of dalteparin during 84 HD sessions (4-4.5 h) was prospectively examined in 12 patients. Six of the patients were treated with warfarin. The initial dalteparin dose was reduced to 50% if no clotting was observed. Clinical clotting was evaluated by inspection of the air trap every hour and by inspection of the dialyser after each session. Anti-FXa activity was measured for assessment of dalteparin activity. Markers of activated plasma coagulation, (thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) and prothrombin fragment 1+2 (PF1+2)) and a marker of platelet activation (beta-thromboglobulin, beta-TG), were measured before the start of and after 3 and 4 h of dialysis. Ten pre-dialytic patients with chronic renal failure served as a control group. A total of 230 measurements of each parameter were performed. RESULTS: An anti-FXa activity above 0.4 IU/ml at the end of HD inhibits overt clot formation for 4 h. This was obtained by an intravenous dalteparin dose of about 5000 IU. TAT and PF1+2 correlated to clinical clotting episodes (r=0.50 and 0.47, P<0.001). beta-TG was not significantly correlated to clinical clotting. All parameters increased during the sessions (TAT, PF1+2, beta-TG, P<0.001). When measurements during clinical clotting episodes were disregarded, all parameters were still markedly increased. Warfarin-treated patients had lower TAT and PF1+2. Dialysis patients had higher beta-TG values than pre-dialytic patients. CONCLUSION: Despite clinically effective anticoagulation, obtained by dalteparin administration, platelets and coagulation are activated by HD, resulting in a potentially thrombophilic state. Warfarin treatment reduces clinical clot formation and subclinical activation of coagulation.     

Safety and efficacy of single bolus anticoagulation with enoxaparin for chronic hemodialysis. Results of an open-label post-certification study

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is supposed to be advantageous compared to unfractionated heparin for chronic hemodialysis (HD) with respect to lipid and bone metabolism, polymorphonuclear cell stimulation, induction of antibody-mediated thrombocytopenia, and aldosterone suppression. Due to longer biological half-life, LMWH offers the possibility of single bolus administration. METHODS: To assess safety and efficacy of single bolus anticoagulation with enoxaparin for chronic HD, 781 stable HD patients from 79 German dialysis centers (mean age 62 years; 31% ESRD due to diabetes mellitus) were monitored by clinical and laboratory parameters for 32 weeks. Additionally, in a single dialysis center, 22 chronic HD patients were investigated by molecular markers of coagulation during chronic HD under conditions of single bolus or continuous anticoagulation regimens. Anti-Xa activity and the thrombin- antithrombin-III complex (TAT) were determined before the enoxaparin bolus, after 15 min, 2 h, and at the end of HD in venous and arterial blood lines. RESULTS: Chronic HD was performed in 24,117 HD treatments with enoxaparin at a median dose of 70.1 IU/kg (5,000 IU median total dose) for single bolus anticoagulation. In 83.0% of HD treatments, enoxaparin was given as single bolus. In 98.3% of patients no adverse event was reported. No drug-related severe adverse event occurred. Significant clotting problems were observed in only 0.3% of HD treatments with single bolus anticoagulation. As assessed in 257 HD treatments, essentially identical anti-Xa levels were detected at the end of HD with single bolus (50 IU/kg) or continuous (mean total dose 43 IU/kg) anticoagulation regimens. Bolus anticoagulation resulted in higher TAT generation at the end of HD. However, this was not associated with increased macroscopic clot formation. CONCLUSION: Single bolus anticoagulation with enoxaparin was safe and effective for chronic HD. For a duration of 4 h HD, a median dose of 70 IU/kg can be recommended for regular use, which is in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for use of enoxaparin recommending a range of 50-100 IU/kg.     

Comparative analysis of procoagulatory activity of haemodialysis, haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration with a polysulfone membrane (APS) and with different modes of enoxaparin anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND: Treatment modalities of renal replacement therapy differ in their diffusive and convective mass transfer characteristics. It was the goal of this study to clarify whether an increase in convective mass transfer as performed with haemofiltration (HF) and haemodiafiltration (HDF) in comparison with high-flux haemodialysis (HD) is associated with an alteration in procoagulatory activity or with complement activation. METHODS: Ten stable chronic HD patients were monitored during 120 treatments in a randomized cross over design. A high-flux polysulfone dialyser (APS 900) was used for high-flux HD, pre-dilution HF and pre-dilution HDF. Constant flow of on-line substitution fluid for HF and HDF was 200 ml/min. The low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin was used for anticoagulation (i) as single bolus (50 IU/kg body weight, median 3700 IU) and (ii) as bolus of 1200 IU followed by a median continuous dose of 400 IU/h. Blood samples were collected before the LMWH bolus, after 10 min, 60 min, 120 min and at the end of treatment in venous and arterial blood lines to determine antiXa activity, thrombin-antithrombin-III complex (TAT), D-dimer and C5a generation. RESULTS: Net ultrafiltration did not significantly differ between HD, HF and HDF but total ultrafiltration in HF and HDF far exceeded total ultrafiltration in HD. With conditions of single bolus, or bolus and continuous anticoagulation with enoxaparin, after comparable treatment times (median duration 4.25 h), TAT and D-dimer generation at identical anti-Xa levels revealed significantly higher coagulation activity during HF and HDF, compared with high-flux HD as assessed by comparative area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Plasma concentration of C5a in venous bloodlines did not significantly differ during HD, HF and HDF. CONCLUSION: A higher convective mass transfer during HF and HDF, in comparison with high-flux HD caused by a greater total ultrafiltration volume was associated with increased procoagulatory activity in the extracorporeal circuit. Molecular markers assessing the activation of coagulation are appropriate to adjust the anticoagulation regime to high UF volumes in order to minimize bleeding risk and optimize patency of the extracorporeal circuit.     

Intermittent saline flushes during haemodialysis do not alleviate coagulation and clot formation in stable patients receiving reduced doses of dalteparin.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-free haemodialysis (HD) with intermittent saline flushes (ISF) in patients with bleeding risk is widely used. The aim of this study was to investigate if ISF reduce coagulation and clotting in stable patients receiving reduced doses of dalteparin. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were stable chronic HD patients >or=18 years of age and haemoglobin >or=11 g/dl. Exclusion criteria were use of warfarin and acetylsalicylic acid. Six HD sessions were evaluated per patient. Dalteparin was given as one bolus dose at start of HD (50% of the conventional dose). In HD number 1, 3 and 5, 100 ml saline solution was flushed through the filter each 30 min. In HD 2, 4 and 6, no ISF were given. Potential clotting in the bubble trap was visually observed each hour and graded on a 4-point scale: 1 = normal, 2 = fibrinous ring, 3 = clot formation and 4 = coagulated system. The dialyser was visually inspected at the end of each session: 1 = normal, 2 = a few blood stripes (affecting less than 5% of the surface fibres), 3 = many blood stripes (more than 5% of the fibres) and 4 = coagulated filter. The coagulation marker PF1+2, the platelet activation marker beta-TG and anti-FXa activity were repeatedly measured during HD. RESULTS: Six men and two women were included. In four cases (four different patients), HD was stopped due to a coagulated system, all cases on days with ISF performed. Multiple linear regression analyses with repeated measurements showed that ISF adjusted for dalteparin dose/kg significantly increased mean clot in the bubble trap, estimate (B) = 0.717, P = 0.0001 and also showed that ISF increased PF1+2, B = 0.16, P = 0.001 when adjusted for anti-FXa activity and hours of dialysis, whereas beta-TG was only borderline increased, B = 0.09, P = 0.055. CONCLUSIONS: ISF during HD does not alleviate visible clotting or intravascular coagulation activity in stable patients receiving reduced doses of dalteparin and polysulphone dialysers. Whether this applies to unstable patients with increased bleeding risk not receiving any anticoagulation remains to be shown.     

The effect of oral anticoagulation on clotting during hemodialysis

BACKGROUND: Between 5% and 10% of hemodialysis patients are treated with oral anticoagulants. It is currently unknown whether additional anticoagulation with heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is needed to prevent clotting during hemodialysis. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, cross-over study 10 patients treated with oral anticoagulants (phenprocoumon) received either no additional anticoagulation or low dose dalteparin (bolus of 40 IU/kg body weight) before dialysis. Efficacy of hemodialysis was measured by normalized weekly Kt/V and urea reduction rate (URR). Thrombus formation was evaluated by measurement of D-dimer and inspection of air traps and dialyser. RESULTS: The median international normalized ratio (INR) did not differ between both observation periods (phenprocoumon 2.2(2 to 3) vs. dalteparin 2.1(2 to 2.9). The anti-Xa level in dalteparin patients was 0.33 (0.27 to 0.38) IU/mL after 2 hours and 0.16 (0.03 to 0.23) IU/mL after 4 hours of hemodialysis. The median increase of D-dimer was significantly higher in patients without additional dalteparin therapy during hemodialysis (DeltaD-dimer 0.23 microg/mL vs. 0.03 mug/mL) (P= 0.0004). Complete thrombosis of the dialyser membrane occurred in one patient in the phenprocoumon group but in none with combined treatment. The extent of thrombosis in the arterial and venous air trap and dialyser was significantly less in patients with additional dalteparin therapy (P= 0.0014, P= 0.0002, and P= 0.0005, respectively). Weekly Kt/V and URR was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Standard oral anticoagulation with an INR between 2 and 3 is insufficient to prevent clotting during hemodialysis. Additional low dose anticoagulation with a LMWH or heparin is necessary to facilitate treatment.     

The clinical onset of heparin is rapid

This study used the activated clotting time (ACT) to determine the clinical onset of four different doses of heparin after bolus injection into the central circulation. Ten consenting adults (Group A) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were given 350 U/kg of bovine lung heparin and had simultaneous duplicate arterial and venous ACT determinations at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 600 s after heparin injection. Twenty additional coronary artery bypass grafting patients were alternately assigned to one of two 10-patient groups (B and C), which were given 200 and 300 U/kg of bovine lung heparin, respectively. Group D consisted of 10 abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy patients who received 70 U/kg of bovine lung heparin. In Groups B, C, and D, duplicate ACT measurements were taken from an indwelling arterial catheter at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 300 s after completion of a bolus injection of heparin into the central circulation. After a 70 U/kg heparin dose, all patients had significant ACT prolongation within 30 s, and 8 of 10 had effectively achieved their peak anticoagulation response by that time. In all patients receiving 200, 300, and 350 U/kg of heparin, arterial anticoagulation (ACT > 300 s) occurred and in most patients peaked within 30 s after heparin administration (P < 0.05). Arterial and venous ACTs did not differ significantly from each other at any measurement period, but venous ACTs peaked slightly later than arterial ACTs (within 60 s in 9 of 10 patients). When 200 U/kg or more of heparin is administered into the central venous circulation in hemodynamically stable anesthetized patients, peak arterial ACT prolongation occurs within 30 s and peak venous ACT prolongation within 60 s.     

Usefulness of Thrombelastography for Dosage Monitoring of Low Molecular Weight Heparin and Unfractionated Heparin During Hemodialysis

Low molecular weight heparin (LMH) acts as an anticoagulation agent mainly through its anti-activated coagulation factor X (Xa) activity. Thrombelastography (TEG) is expected to be useful to monitor the dosage of LMH during hemodialysis because reaction time on TEG (TEG-r) is considered to reflect blood thromboplastin formation time, which depends on the formation of Xa. To test this possibility, we compared the usefulness of TEG, activated coagulation time (ACT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and anti-Xa activity in 28 hemodialysis patients using both conventional unfractionated heparin (UFH) and LMH on separate dialysis procedures. Anti-Xa activity of LMH was comparable to that of UFH when it was measured using both LMH and UFH as standards. Anti-Xa activity, which theoretically depended on the heparin concentration in blood samples, did not correlate with the degree of dialyzer clotting. The APTT correlated well with anti-Xa activity in patients using LMH (r = 0.686, p less than 0.01) and UFH (r = 0.906, p less than 0.01), but not with the degree of dialyzer clotting. The TEG-r correlated well with the degree of dialyzer clotting both in patients using LMH and those using UFH (measurements of samples obtained from the venous side of the extracorporeal circuit) and weakly correlated with anti-Xa activity in patients using LMH (r = 0.402, p less than 0.05). The ACT did not correlate with the degree of dialyzer clotting or anti-Xa activity. These results suggest that TEG-r reflects the efficacy of heparin in the extra-corporeal blood circuit, whereas APTT mainly reflects heparin concentration of the blood samples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Measurement of whole blood factor Xa-activated clotting time during hemodialysis with low-molecular-weight heparin

Purpose To determine whole blood factor Xa-activated clotting time (XaACT), a test for monitoring low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). Methods Blood was obtained from six healthy volunteers. Dalteparin, a LMWH, was mixed with the blood to concentrations of 0,05 and 1.0IU·ml⁻¹. XaACT, activated clotting time (ACT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were measured at each dalteparin concentration. XaACT of blood from the outflow and inflow sides of the blood circuit in seven hemodialysis patients was measured before and after bolus administration of 1000 IU of dalteparin, followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 500IU·h⁻¹. Results XaACT, ACT, and APTT in dalteparin-containing blood from volunteers were correlated with dalteparin concentration (y=312.8x+86.4;r ²=0.88;P<0.001,y=41.8x +113.5;r ²=0.83;P<0.001, andy=59.5x+38.8;r ²=0.80;P<0.001, respectively). The regression slope of XaACT was steeper than those of ACT and APTT (P<0.001). In hemodialysis patients, dalteparin increased XaACT on the outflow and inflow sides of the circuit (P<0.001,P<0.05, respectively). Conclusion The measurement of XaACT can be employed to monitor LMWHs in clinical settings.     

A quick assay for monitoring recombinant hirudin during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II : adaptation of the ecarin clotting time to the act II device

BACKGROUND: Recombinant hirudin is increasingly advocated as a promising alternative anticoagulation for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II during cardiopulmonary bypass. This requires monitoring of the ecarin clotting time. No commercial ecarin clotting time assay is available for clinical use. We adapted the ecarin clotting time to the easy-to-handle ACT II device. METHODS: Three different concentrations of the ecarin reagent (20, 10, 5 U/mL) were investigated as preliminary studies. Standard calibration curves were constructed for concentrations of recombinant hirudin ranging from 0 to 5 microgram/mL. In vivo samples were collected from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass, and the values were compared with the values obtained by the chromogenic method. The final concentration for the assay of 5 IU/mL ecarin was further assessed in vitro for reproducibility and the influence of variations in hematocrit, platelet count, and procoagulants. RESULTS: All three concentrations of ecarin revealed linearity to 5 microgram/mL concentrations of recombinant hirudin. The ecarin concentration of 5 U/mL revealed the best correlation (0.87) to the laboratory method, was reproducible over the whole recombinant hirudin range, and was not influenced by the variations in the in vitro setup. CONCLUSIONS: The ACT II/ecarin clotting time with an ecarin concentration of 5 U/mL is a simple and reliable assay for monitoring recombinant hirudin during cardiopulmonary bypass. Use of this assay allows a wider use of recombinant hirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II during bypass and thereby may contribute to the safer management of these patients.     

Effects of ultrafiltration on enoxaparin: an in vitro analysis

The use of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) as an anticoagulant in the heparin-resistant patient poses challenges during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The ultrafiltrability of LMWH has not been previously examined. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of continuous ultrafiltration on the concentraton of a LMWH, enoxaparin. An in vitro analysis was performed using fresh whole human blood and an extracorporeal circuit containing four parallel ultrafiltrators and a cardiotomy reservoir with an integrated heat exchanger. Constant conditions included temperature (37 degrees C), flow (0.20 L-min(-1)) transmembrane pressure (200 mmHg), and hematocrit (25 +/- 2%). Samples were collected at the inlet, outlet, and ultrafiltrate line at one and three min for one control trial and again for each of the four hemoconcentrators following the bolus of enoxaparin. Coagulation measurements included a viscoelastic monitor (TEG), activated clotting time (ACT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and quantitative analysis utilizing a membrane-based electrode for potentiometric measurement of polyanionic concentrations of enoxaparin. Enoxaparin concentration, from inlet to outlet, increased from 2.95 +/- 0.64 to 5.89 +/- 0.95 (p < .001) at 1 min and 4.24 +/- 0.49 to 7.89 +/- 0.606 (p < .001) at 3 min. Kinetic clot activity, as assessed by the TEG index, decreased from -3.8 +/- 2.5 vs. -10.5 +/- 6.0; (p < .01) pre- to postultrafiltrator samples after 3 min. ACT and aPTT results demonstrated no significant change. In conclusion, this study demonstrates enoxaparin is concentrated with the use of continuous ultrafiltration. Functional coagulation studies also indicate a concentrating effect, primarily via the TEG.     

Measurement of patients' bivalirudin plasma levels by a thrombelastograph ecarin clotting time assay: a comparison to a standard activated clotting time

Standard activated clotting time (ACT) tests have a poor correlation to bivalirudin levels, leading to uncertainty regarding adequate anticoagulation in percutaneous coronary intervention patients. We tested a Thrombelastograph (TEG) ecarin clotting time (ECT) assay for sensitivity to bivalirudin using blood from 80 patients undergoing interventional cardiology procedures with bivalirudin anticoagulation. This was compared to a standard Hemochron ACT assay using diatomaceous earth. With the TEG assay, the direct thrombin activator, ecarin, was used to initiate coagulation and measured as the reaction time. Plasma samples were evaluated for bivalirudin by a chromogenic assay at an independent hematological laboratory. Linear regression of the standard ACT versus bivalirudin level gave an r = 0.306 whereas the TEG ECT gave a much higher r2 = 0.746 (both P < 0.0001). The TEG ECT should prove more useful than the standard ACT for monitoring bivalirudin anticoagulation across the clinically therapeutic range.     

Low preoperative antithrombin activity causes reduced response to heparin in adult but not in infant cardiac-surgical patients

We evaluated the interaction of preoperative antithrombin (AT) activity and intraoperative response to heparin in cardiac surgery. Heparin anticoagulation is essential during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Heparin itself has no anticoagulant properties, however it causes a conformational change of the physiologic plasma inhibitor AT that converts this slow-acting serine protease inhibitor into a fast acting one. Thus, adequate AT activity is a prerequisite for sufficient heparin anticoagulation. AT activity is reduced by long-term heparin therapy. This prospective, observational study investigated 1516 consecutive cardiac-surgical patients (1304 patients >1 yr (Group A) and 212 patients < or = 1 yr (Group I)). AT activity was measured the day before surgery by a chromogenic substrate assay. The celite-activated activated clotting time (ACT) was used to guide intraoperative heparin administration. Heparin sensitivity was calculated and the postoperative blood loss and perioperative blood requirement was recorded. Infant patients had significantly less preoperative AT activity compared with older patients: 84 (33)% vs 97 (17)%, median (interquartile range) (P < 0. 05). The subgroup of patients aged <1 mo (n = 64) demonstrated a preoperative AT activity of 56 (27)% as compared with 90 (23)% in infant patients between one month and one year (n = 148). In adult patients, preoperative AT activity depended predominantly on preoperative heparin treatment: 62% of the patients with an AT activity <80% were pretreated with heparin. Five minutes after heparin but before CPB the ACT was 587 (334) s in Group A patients with AT activity > or = 80%, and 516 (232) in patients with AT activity < or = 80% (P < 0.05). The target ACT of 480 s was achieved in 70% of patients with normal AT activity in Group A compared with only 54% of patients with AT activity <80% (P < 0.05). In Group A patients with decreased AT activity, 18% demonstrated an inadequate ACT response-defined as ACT <400 s-to the first bolus injection of heparin. In Group I, preoperative AT activity did not influence the ACT response (ACT 5 min after heparin: 846 [447] s in patients with AT activity > or = 80% vs 1000 [364] s in patients with decreased AT activity). The heparin sensitivity was 2.4 (1.1) s/unit heparin/kg compared with 1.5 (0.8) s/unit heparin/KG in group A (P < 0.05). These results suggest that preoperative diminished AT activity causes reduced response to heparin in adult but not in infant patients. Infant patients demonstrate a higher heparin sensitivity despite lower preoperative AT activity. Measurement of preoperative AT activity identifies adult patients at risk of reduced sensitivity to heparin. Implications: In patients less than one year of age, low antithrombin (AT) activity is caused by the immature coagulation system. Despite low AT activity, these young patients demonstrate a normal or increased response to heparin anticoagulation before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In contrast, in patients older than one year of age and adult patients decreased preoperative AT activity is mainly caused by preoperative heparin therapy and causes insufficient response to heparin anticoagulation with a standard heparin dosage. Measurement of preoperative AT activity identifies patients at risk of inadequate anticoagulation during CPB.     

Evaluation with micro‐CT of different anticoagulation strategies during hemodialysis in patients with thrombocytopenia: A randomized crossover study

In patients with enhanced risk for bleeding, heparin‐free hemodialysis (HD) with conventional dialyzers is routinely used. To explore the potential benefit of using heparin‐coated dialyzers, we used a reference CT‐scanning technique and registered different clotting parameters to quantify coagulation with heparin‐coated versus non‐coated dialyzers. Six HD patients with thrombocytopenia were dialyzed 240 min in a randomized crossover study with Evodial 1.3 or FX600 Cordiax, each without anticoagulation. Blood samples were taken from the vascular access predialysis, and from the dialyzer inlet and outlet at 5 and 240 min after dialysis start. Predialysis blood samples were analyzed for hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocytes, fibrinogen, and activated partial thromboplastin time. On dialyzer inlet and outlet blood samples, a viscoelastic measurement of blood coagulation was performed using a Sonoclot analyzer. After dialysis, dialyzers were visually scored, subsequently dried for 24 h, weighed, and scanned with micro‐CT at a resolution of 25 µm. After image reconstruction, the open, non‐coagulated fibers were counted in a representative cross‐section at the dialyzer outlet. No sessions were terminated prematurely for circuit clotting. Heparin‐coated dialyzers had more patent fibers on micro‐CT versus non‐coated dialyzers and also had a better score of subjective visual assessment of fiber clotting. There was no difference in subjective assessment of clotting at the venous drip chamber. With both dialyzers, all ACT values remained in the normal range, and were lower at the dialyzer outlet versus inlet. In conclusion, dialysis with a heparin‐coated versus non heparin‐coated membrane results in substantially less coagulated fibers during 4 h hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation. Eventual leaching of heparin, immobilized on the fiber membrane, does not result in measurable systemic anticoagulation.     

Coagulation and fibrinolytic profiles and appropriate use of heparin after living-donor liver transplantation

Heparin is widely used to reduce the incidence of vascular thrombosis after liver transplantation. Appropriate use of heparin based on changes in coagulation and fibrinolytic profiles, however, has not yet been discussed in detail. We performed living-donor liver transplantation for 128 adult patients. In this series, dalteparin (25 IU/kg/d) was administered until post-operative day (POD) 2. On POD 3, the anticoagulant drug was changed to heparin (unfractionated heparin sodium, 5000 U/d), the dose of which was changed according to the level of activated clotting time (ACT) targeted between 130 and 160 s. The plasma level of plasmin-alpha2 plasmin inhibitor complex, thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), and fibrin degradation product D-dimer (FDP-DD) were monitored in the 21 patients. Predictors for heparin doses were analyzed among clinical parameters (n = 128). Four patients (3%) were complicated with thrombosis despite the above-mentioned anticoagulation protocol. Transfusion and/or relaparotomy for hemostasis were necessary for bleeding in 19 patients (15%). The TAT level markedly elevated until POD 3 and FDP-DD peaked later. The required heparin dose to maintain adequate ACT levels increased linearly until POD 8, and kept constant thereafter, which correlated with the weight of the liver graft (p = 0.01). Thus, frequent monitoring of the heparin dosage is necessary to keep the ACT level in the target range in the first post-operative week. High hemorrhage complications in our series indicate that the lower target ACT range may be preferable in the second post-operative week.     

Intermittent hirudin versus continuous heparin for anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND: Besides possible bleeding complications a further problem in anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) where further anticoagulation with heparin is contraindicated. The application of continuous hirudin as alternative for heparin caused bleeding complications by comparable filter efficacy. Aim of this prospective-controlled pilot study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intermittent hirudin and continuous heparin for anticoagulation during CRRT in critically ill patients. METHODS: 26 patients receiving CRRT were randomly allocated to two groups: Heparin group (14 patients): continuous administration of 250 IU/h heparin, dose was adjusted in 125 IU/h steps with a targeted activated clotting time (ACT) of 180-210 s. Hirudin group (12 patients): initial bolus application of 2-2-5 microg/kg hirudin, dose was adjusted in 2 microg/kg bolus steps with a targeted ecarin clotting time (ECT) >80 s. Observation time was 96 hours. RESULTS: Measured filter run time was virtually longer for heparin. No bleeding complications were observed in the hirudin group, two bleeding complications in the heparin group. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent hirudin can be used safely for anticoagulation in CRRT. However, the in tendency better filter survival for heparin elucidates the need for further investigations to find the right dosage equilibrium between filter clotting and bleeding complications.     

Sensitivity of a modified ACT test to levels of bivalirudin used during cardiac surgery

Assessment of anticoagulation status during cardiac surgery can be valuable for novel therapeutics, including direct thrombin inhibitors. The ecarin clotting time (ECT) has been reported to be sensitive for monitoring of bivalirudin in cardiac surgery but is not commercially available. The activated clotting time (ACT), commonly used for heparin monitoring, may display a lack of sensitivity to alternative anticoagulants when used in on-pump cardiac surgery. Both the ACT and ECT have been successfully used for monitoring bivalirudin anticoagulation in off-pump cardiac surgery. A new ACT, the ACTT, was developed to increase the linearity of the clotting time response to bivalirudin at higher concentrations. After Ethics Committee approval, a pilot study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of using bivalirudin for on-pump cardiac surgery and to evaluate dosing of bivalirudin in terms of the pharmacokinetic and safety profile in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Secondary objectives included an assessment of the anticoagulation profile and correlation of the response seen with various ACTs and the ECT with the plasma bivalirudin concentration in the patients' blood. After informed consent, 10 sequential patients presenting for elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass received bivalirudin anticoagulation in lieu of heparin. Dosing was fixed (1.0 mg/kg bolus followed by a 2.5 mg/kg/h infusion) and not titrated on the basis of coagulation test results. At baseline and 15-minute intervals, blood samples were collected for ACT (ACTT, Celite, kaolin, ACT+), ECT, and bivalirudin plasma level measurements. Over the range of bivalirudin plasma concentrations in this study, all clot-based systems examined were prolonged according to concentration and showed good correlation with bivalirudin plasma levels. The ACTT and the ECT showed greater sensitivity to bivalirudin (-28.5 sec/microg/ml bivalirudin) compared with the other ACTs evaluated (approximately 14 sec/microg/ml). This difference in sensitivity was also evident at low concentrations of bivalirudin (<10 microg/ ml), with the ECT and ACTT showing slopes near 40, and the ACT slopes varying from 18 to 27 sec/microg/ml. The ACTT assay is sensitive to levels of bivalirudin and may offer a simple method for monitoring bivalirudin during cardiac surgery.