Cardiac Tolerability of Pertuzumab Plus Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel in Patients With HER2‐Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in CLEOPATRA: A Randomized,Double‐Blind,Placebo‐Controlled Phase III Study

Introduction.

We report cardiac tolerability of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel observed in the phase III study CLEOPATRA in patients with HER2-positive first-line metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and Methods.

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 were required for study entry. During the study, LVEF assessments took place every 9 weeks. Pertuzumab/placebo was given at 840 mg, then 420 mg q3w; trastuzumab was administered at 8 mg/kg, then 6 mg/kg q3w, and docetaxel was initiated at 75 mg/m² q3w.

Results.

The incidence of cardiac adverse events (all grades) was 16.4% in the placebo arm and 14.5% in the pertuzumab arm, with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD, all grades) being the most frequently reported event (8.3% versus 4.4% in the placebo and pertuzumab arm). Declines in LVEF by ≥10% points from baseline and to <50% were reported in 6.6% and 3.8% of patients in the placebo and pertuzumab arm, respectively. Seventy-two percent (placebo arm) and 86.7% (pertuzumab arm) of those patients recovered to a value ≥50%. The incidence of symptomatic LVSD was low, occurring in 1.8% (n = 7) versus 1.0% (n = 4) of patients in the placebo and pertuzumab arm. In 8/11 patients, the symptomatic LVSD had resolved at data cutoff.

Conclusion.

The combination of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel did not increase the incidence of cardiac adverse events, including LVSD, compared with the control arm in HER2-positive MBC. The majority of cardiac adverse events were reversible.     

Dual HER2-blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer: a subanalysis of data from the randomized phase III GeparSepto trial

BackgroundThe neoadjuvant phase III GeparSepto study showed that substituting nab-paclitaxel for standard solvent-based paclitaxel significantly improved the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate achieved with a sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide for high-risk primary breast cancer. Recent trials demonstrated that in HER2+ breast cancer pCR can be increased by using pertuzumab in addition to trastuzumab and chemotherapy. The present analysis focuses on efficacy and safety data from the subset of patients with HER2+ tumors from the GeparSepto trial (n = 396) in comparison to the HER2- cohort.Patients and methodsPatients with histologically confirmed breast cancer (n = 1206) received four cycles of weekly paclitaxel [either solvent-based (Pac) or nab-paclitaxel (nab-Pac), according to randomization] followed by 4 cycles of epirubicin 90 mg/m² plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² q3w, with concurrent trastuzumab and pertuzumab q3w for those with HER2+ tumors. The primary endpoint was pCR defined as ypT0 ypN0.ResultsHigher rates of pCR were achieved in HER2+ than in HER2- tumors (57.8% versus 22.0%,P < 0.0001), with the highest rate in the HER2+/HR- cohort (71.0%; 66.7% Pac, 74.6% nab-Pac). In HER2+/HR+ tumors, the pCR rate was 52.9% (49.7% Pac, 56.4% nab-Pac). Grade ≥3 toxic effects were significantly more common in HER2+ than in HER2- patients, with grade 3–4 diarrhea in 7.6% versus 0.9% (P < 0.001) and febrile neutropenia in 6.3% versus 3.3% (P = 0.023) of patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreases from baseline were uncommon, with 2.0% versus 0.4% of patients showing decreases to <50% along with a ≥10% decrease from baseline.ConclusionIn HER2+ early breast cancer, a dual HER2-targeted combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab, together with taxane–epirubicin–cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy, achieved high rates of pCR.     

Effect of docetaxel duration on clinical outcomes: exploratory analysis of CLEOPATRA,a phase III randomized controlled trial

BackgroundCombination pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel (D) is considered standard first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. This post hoc, exploratory analysis of CLEOPATRA study data evaluated the clinical effects of D treatment duration within this regimen. The clinical benefits of pertuzumab and trastuzumab by different durations of D treatment were also evaluated.Patients and methodsPatients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer received trastuzumab and D plus pertuzumab or placebo. Clinical outcomes were analyzed by the number of D cycles that patients received (<6D, 6D, or >6D). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for each treatment arm within each D cycle group were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier approach. Time-dependent, multivariate Cox regression was applied to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HER2-targeted therapy and D cycle groups.ResultsOverall, 804 patients received <6D (n = 119), 6D (n = 210), or >6D (n = 475) cycles. After adjusting for pertuzumab benefits versus placebo (PFS HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.51–0.74, P < 0.0001; OS HR = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.49–0.74, P < 0.0001), >6D versus 6D cycles was not associated with statistically significant improvements in PFS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.63–1.01, P = 0.0640) or OS (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.69–1.12, P = 0.3073). Consistent improvements in PFS and OS were observed with pertuzumab versus placebo, irrespective of D duration. The HRs for PFS were 0.395, 0.615, and 0.633 for <6D, 6D, and >6D cycles, respectively (P < 0.05 for all D cycle groups). Corresponding HRs for OS were 0.577, 0.700, and 0.612, respectively (P < 0.05 for <6D and >6D).ConclusionsAfter accounting for pertuzumab benefits, more than six cycles of D treatment was not associated with significant improvements in either PFS or OS compared with six cycles. The addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab improved clinical outcomes versus trastuzumab plus placebo, regardless of D treatment duration.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT00567190.     

Cardiac toxicity and efficacy of trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab in patients with trastuzumab-insensitive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of trastuzumab with pertuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer who had progressive disease on trastuzumab-based therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with measurable HER2(+) metastatic breast cancer, < or = 3 trastuzumab-based regimens, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > or = 55% received 8 or 6 mg/kg trastuzumab and 840 mg pertuzumab i.v. followed by 6 mg/kg trastuzumab and 420 mg pertuzumab every 3 weeks. Cardiac evaluation and tumor response were assessed every 3 and 6 weeks, respectively. RESULTS: Eleven patients received 64 cycles of trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. A total of 92 echocardiograms and 8 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies were done. With the lower limit of normal LVEF 55%, left ventricular systolic dysfunction was observed in six patients, three grade 1, two grade 2, and one grade 3 according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The objective response rate was 18%. Two patients had partial responses, three had stable disease, and six had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 6 weeks. In baseline tumors from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary and/or metastatic tumor biopsies, pHER2-Y1248 trended toward an increase in patients with partial response compared with those with stable disease/progressive disease (P = 0.095). CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab may have clinical benefit in selected patients who have previously been treated with trastuzumab. Cardiac toxicity, although asymptomatic in most cases, was associated with this treatment. Further evaluation of efficacy of this combination is required to define the overall risks and benefits.     

Changes in tumor expression of HER2 and hormone receptors status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 21 755 patients from the Japanese breast cancer registry

BackgroundWe investigate rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) and tumor expression of ER, PgR, HER2 discordance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using Japanese breast cancer registry data.Patients and methodsRecords of more than 300 000 breast cancer cases treated at 800 hospitals from 2004 to 2013 were retrieved from the breast cancer registry. After data cleanup, we included 21 755 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had no distant metastases. pCR was defined as no invasive tumor in the breast detected during surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. HER2 overexpression was determined immunohistochemically and/or using fluorescence in situ hybridization.ResultspCR was achieved in 5.7% of luminal tumors (n = 8730), 24.6% of HER2-positive tumors (n = 4403), and 18.9% of triple-negative tumors (n = 3660). Among HER2-positive tumors, pCR was achieved in 31.6% of ER-negative tumors (n = 2252), 17.0% of ER-positive ones (n = 2132), 31.4% of patients who received trastuzumab as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 2437), and 16.2% of patients who did not receive trastuzumab (n = 1966). Of the 2811 patients who were HER2-positive before treatment, 601 (21.4%) had HER2-negative tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas 340 (3.4%) of the 9947 patients with HER2-negative tumors before treatment had HER2-positive tumors afterward. Of the 10 973 patients with ER-positive tumors before treatment, 499 (4.6%) had ER-negative tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas 519 (9.3%) of the 5607 patients who were ER-negative before treatment had ER-positive tumors afterward.ConclusionWe confirmed that loss of HER2-positive status can occur after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer. We also confirmed that in practice, differences in pCR rates between breast cancer subtypes are the same as in clinical trials. Our data strongly support the need for retest ER, PgR, HER2 of surgical sample after neoadjuvant therapy in order to accurately determine appropriate use of targeted therapy.     

Impact of Anti-HER2 Treatments Combined With Atezolizumab on the Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Early or Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results From a Phase Ib Study

BackgroundDespite advances, there continues to be unmet need in breast cancer. Combining anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) cancer immunotherapy atezolizumab with other targeted therapies may enhance T-cell–dependent cytolytic antitumor activity.MethodsThis open-label, phase Ib study evaluated the safety of atezolizumab-based combinations with antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity or antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) agents. Patients with unresectable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2⁺) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) received atezolizumab with trastuzumab/pertuzumab, atezolizumab with the ADC ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), or atezolizumab with trastuzumab/pertuzumab and docetaxel. In an early–breast cancer (eBC) “window of opportunity” study, patients with operable HER2⁺ locally advanced or inflammatory eBC received neoadjuvant atezolizumab with trastuzumab/pertuzumab or atezolizumab/T-DM1, followed by docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab/pertuzumab. Exploratory outcomes included tumor response and biomarkers.ResultsBy March 15, 2019, 73 patients were enrolled. Safety findings were consistent with the treatment components’ individual profiles. Objective responses were observed in 2 of 6 and 5 of 14 patients in 2 mBC cohorts receiving atezolizumab/T-DM1 and in 6 of 6 patients with mBC receiving atezolizumab, trastuzumab/pertuzumab, and docetaxel. PD-L1 in immune cells was the only biomarker that increased with atezolizumab/T-DM1. In the window of opportunity cohorts, PD-L1 levels and CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration increased from baseline in HER2⁺ eBC tumors receiving atezolizumab with trastuzumab/pertuzumab or T-DM1, irrespective of response. Despite increases in T-cell and B-cell gene signatures with trastuzumab/pertuzumab, but not T-DM1, neither combination promoted T-cell receptor clonal expansion.ConclusionAtezolizumab with antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity or ADC agents appears safe and may activate the adaptive immune system of patients with HER2⁺ eBC tumors more than those with mBC tumors.     

Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab predicts for improved survival in women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer

BackgroundWe sought to determine the prognostic value of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab.Patients and methodsTwo hundred and twenty-nine women with HER2/neu (HER2)-overexpressing breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab between 2001 and 2008. Patients were grouped based on pathologic complete response (pCR, n = 114) or less than pCR (<pCR, n = 115); as well as by pathologic stage. Locoregional recurrence-free (LRFS), distant metastasis-free (DMFS), recurrence-free (RFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were compared.ResultsThe median follow-up was 63 (range 53–77) months. There was no difference in clinical stage between patients with pCR or <pCR. Compared with patients achieving <pCR, those with the pCR had higher 5-year rates of LRFS (100% versus 95%, P = 0.011), DMFS (96% versus 80%, P < 0.001), RFS (96% versus 79%, P < 0.001), and OS (95% versus 84%, P = 0.006). Improvements in RFS and OS were seen with decreasing post-treatment stage. Failure to achieve a pCR was the strongest independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67–10.04, P = 0.002) and death (HR = 4.15, 95% CI: 1.39–12.38, P = 0.011).ConclusionspCR and lower pathologic stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab are the strongest predictors of recurrence and survival and are surrogates of the long-term outcome in patients with HER2-overexpressing disease.     

Incidence and management of diarrhea in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with pertuzumab

BackgroundPertuzumab disrupts heterodimerization between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), HER3, and HER4. Thus, pertuzumab could result in adverse events similar to those observed with EGFR antagonists, such as diarrhea. We report the incidence and severity of diarrhea observed with pertuzumab in the CLEOPATRA, NeoSphere, and TRYPHAENA studies.Patients and methodsPatients (n = 1443) had metastatic [CLEOPATRA (n = 804)] or early-stage breast cancer [NeoSphere (n = 416) and TRYPHAENA (n = 223)]. The incidence and severity of diarrhea were analyzed by treatment received. The incidence of febrile neutropenia concurrent with diarrhea and the effect of pre-existing gastrointestinal comorbidities were also evaluated. Subgroup analyses were carried out using CLEOPATRA data.ResultsThe incidence of all-grade diarrhea across studies was generally greater for pertuzumab-based treatment, ranging from 28% to 72% (grade 1, 21%–54%; grade 2, 8%–37%; grade 3, 0%–12%; grade 4, 0%). Incidence was highest during the first pertuzumab-containing cycle, decreasing with subsequent cycles. Dose delays or discontinuations due to diarrhea were infrequent, ranging from 0% to 8%. Among pertuzumab-treated patients with diarrhea, 47%–67% received pharmacological intervention, most commonly with loperamide. Overlap between diarrhea and febrile neutropenia was uncommon, ranging from 0% to 11%. No relationship was observed between pre-existing gastrointestinal comorbidities and diarrhea. In CLEOPATRA, patients ≥65 years treated with pertuzumab had a higher incidence of grade 3 diarrhea than patients <65 years (19% versus 8%). All-grade diarrhea occurred at greater frequency among pertuzumab-treated Asian versus white patients with metastatic breast cancer (74% versus 63%); the corresponding rates in the control arm were 53% and 45%, respectively.ConclusionsIn both the metastatic and early-stage breast cancer settings, diarrhea was common but manageable for all pertuzumab-containing regimens. Diarrheal episodes were mainly low grade and occurred most often during the first treatment cycle. Diarrheal-related drug delays or discontinuations were uncommon.ClinicalTrials.gov identifiersNCT00567190 (CLEOPATRA), NCT00545688 (NeoSphere), NCT00976989 (TRYPHAENA).     

Dual HER2 inhibition in combination with anti-VEGF treatment is active in heavily pretreated HER2-positive breast cancer

BackgroundPreclinical data indicate that dual HER2 inhibition overcomes trastuzumab resistance and that use of an HER2 inhibitor with an anti-angiogenic agent may augment responses.Patients and methodsWe conducted a dose-escalation, phase I study of a combination of trastuzumab, lapatinib and bevacizumab. The subset of patients with metastatic breast cancer was analyzed for safety and response.ResultsTwenty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer (median = 7 prior systemic therapies) (all with prior trastuzumab; 23 with prior lapatinib; one with prior bevacizumab) received treatment on a range of dose levels. The most common treatment-related grade 2 or higher toxicities were diarrhea (n = 11, 42%) and skin rash (n = 2, 8%). The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be the full Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved doses for all the three agents (trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose, 6 mg/kg maintenance dose, intravenously every 3 weeks; lapatinib 1250 mg daily, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks). The overall rate of stable disease (SD) ≥6 months and partial or complete remission (PR/CR) was 50% (five patients with SD ≥6 months; seven PRs (including one unconfirmed); one CR). The rate of SD ≥6 months/PR/CR was not compromised in patients who had previously received study drugs, those with brain metastases, and patients treated at lower dose levels.ConclusionsThe combination of trastuzumab, lapatinib and bevacizumab was well-tolerated at maximally approved doses of each drug, and its activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer suggests that it warrants further investigation.ClinTrials.gov IDNCT00543504.     

In vitro activity of pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab in uterine serous papillary adenocarcinoma

Background:

Uterine serous papillary adenocarcinoma (USPC) is a rare but highly aggressive variant of endometrial cancer. Pertuzumab is a new humanised monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the epidermal growth factor type II receptor (HER2/neu). We evaluated pertuzumab activity separately or in combination with trastuzumab against primary USPC cell lines expressing different levels of HER2/neu.

Methods:

Six USPC cell lines were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), flow cytometry, and real-time PCR for HER2/neu expression. c-erbB2 gene amplification was evaluated using fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). Sensitivity to pertuzumab and trastuzumab-induced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) was evaluated in 5 h chromium release assays. Pertuzumab cytostatic activity was evaluated using proliferation-based assays.

Results:

Three USPC cell lines stained heavily for HER2/neu by IHC and showed amplification of the c-erbB2 gene by FISH. The remaining FISH-negative USPCs expressed HER2/neu at 0/1+ levels. In cytotoxicity experiments against USPC with a high HER2/neu expression, pertuzumab and trastuzumab were similarly effective in inducing strong ADCC. The addition of complement-containing plasma and interleukin-2 increased the cytotoxic effect induced by both mAbs. In low HER2/neu USPC expressors, trastuzumab was more potent than pertuzumab in inducing ADCC. Importantly, in this setting, the combination of pertuzumab with trastuzumab significantly increased the ADCC effect induced by trastuzumab alone (P=0.02). Finally, pertuzumab induced a significant inhibition in the proliferation of all USPC cell lines tested, regardless of their HER-2/neu expression.

Conclusion:

Pertuzumab and trastuzumab induce equally strong ADCC and CDC in FISH-positive USPC cell lines. Pertuzumab significantly increases tratuzumab-induced ADCC against USPC with a low HER2/neu expression and may represent a new therapeutic agent in patients harbouring advanced/recurrent and/or refractory USPC.     

Lung cancer patients with HER2 mutations treated with chemotherapy and HER2-targeted drugs: results from the European EUHER2 cohort

BackgroundHER2 mutations have been identified as oncogenic drivers in lung cancers and are found in 1–2% of lung adenocarcinomas. There is, to date, no standard of care for these patients. We thus aim to study the therapeutic outcomes of patients harboring HER2 mutations and establish the efficacy of various drug regimens.Patients and methodsThis retrospective cohort study in European centers assessed patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a known HER2 exon-20 insertion, treated with chemotherapy and/or HER2-targeted drugs.ResultsWe identified 101 eligible patients from 38 centers: median age 61 years (range: 30–87), 62.4% women, 60.4% never-smokers. All tumors were adenocarcinomas. Concomitant EGFR mutations, ALK translocations, and ROS translocations were observed in 5, 1, and 1 patients, respectively. The median number of treatment lines was 3 (range: 1–11). The median overall survival was 24 months. Overall response rate (ORR) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) with conventional chemotherapy (excluding targeted therapies) were 43.5% and 6 months in first-line (n = 93), and 10% and 4.3 months in second-line (n = 52) therapies. Sixty-five patients received HER2-targeted therapies: trastuzumab = 57, neratinib = 14, afatinib = 9, lapatinib = 5, T-DM1 = 1. ORR was 50.9% and PFS was 4.8 months with trastuzumab or T-DM1.ConclusionThis series shows the chemosensitivity of HER2-driven NSCLC, and the potential interest of HER2-targeted agents. Our results should help to define the best therapeutic strategy for these patients and to orient future clinical trials.     

Incidence and Management of Diarrhea With Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer

BackgroundThe APHINITY (BIG 4-11) study showed that pertuzumab significantly improved the rates of invasive disease-free survival among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, operable breast cancer when added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Because diarrhea was a common adverse event that could compromise treatment administration, we evaluated the incidence and management of diarrhea in the APHINITY study.Patients and MethodsThe APHINITY trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy and 1 year of trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab or placebo. The diarrhea incidence, severity (National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 4.0), onset, and management were analyzed.ResultsA total of 4805 patients were randomized. Diarrhea of any grade was the most common adverse event and occurred in 71% of patients in the pertuzumab arm versus 45% in the placebo arm. Diarrhea grade 3 to 4 was observed in 10% and 4% in the pertuzumab and placebo arms, respectively. The greatest incidence of diarrhea was reported during the concomitant administration of HER2-targeted therapy and taxane (61% vs. 34% of patients experienced an event with pertuzumab vs. placebo, respectively). A marked decrease was observed on chemotherapy cessation. Antidiarrheal agents were commonly used, and diarrhea rarely caused treatment dose modifications or discontinuation.ConclusionDiarrhea was a common adverse event in the APHINITY study. Most episodes were low grade and were generally manageable with common antidiarrheal agents. The incidence of diarrhea was greater with the combination of a taxane and HER2-targeted treatment and decreased once chemotherapy was stopped.     

Health-related quality-of-life assessment in CLEOPATRA,a phase III study combining pertuzumab with trastuzumab and docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundThe phase III CLEOPATRA study demonstrated that combining pertuzumab with trastuzumab plus docetaxel significantly improves progression-free and overall survival in previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Here, we report health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) results from CLEOPATRA.Patients and methodsParticipants were randomly assigned to pertuzumab or placebo, each given with trastuzumab plus docetaxel every 3 weeks. Pertuzumab and trastuzumab were administered until progression and six or more docetaxel cycles were recommended. Time from randomization to a ≥5-point decrease in Trial Outcome Index-Physical/Functional/Breast (TOI-PFB) of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire was analyzed as a prespecified secondary end point. A post hoc exploratory analysis investigated time to ≥2-point deterioration in Breast Cancer Subscale (BCS) score.ResultsTime to ≥5-point decline in TOI-PFB did not differ significantly between the pertuzumab and placebo arms [hazard ratio (HR), 0.97; P = 0.7161]. The median times to TOI-PFB deterioration were 18.4 and 18.3 weeks, respectively (approximately six cycles). The mean TOI-PFB declined slightly until week 18 and recovered thereafter. Pertuzumab increased time until BCS deterioration versus placebo (median 26.7 versus 18.3 weeks; HR, 0.77; P = 0.0061).ConclusionsCombining pertuzumab with trastuzumab and docetaxel had no adverse impact on HRQoL and may prolong time to worsening of breast cancer-specific symptoms.     

Pertuzumab: new hope for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

BackgroundHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is detected in approximately 15% to 20% of all breast cancers (BCs). A revolutionary change in the prognosis of this subgroup of patients has occurred since trastuzumab therapy was introduced into daily clinical practice. However, because trastuzumab resistance is common, new molecules with complementary and/or synergistic mechanisms of action have been developed. Pertuzumab is a new anti-HER2 humanized monoclonal antibody that prevents the formation of HER2 dimers.Material and methodsA computer-based literature search was carried out using PubMed (keywords: breast neoplasm, dimerization, HER-2, pertuzumab); data reported at international meetings are included.ResultsThis paper describes pertuzumab's mechanism of action, safety, and role in HER2-positive BCs. It also explores the role of pertuzumab as a single agent or combined with trastuzumab by reviewing data from preclinical research to ongoing clinical trials. Recently published trials, particularly the CLEOPATRA study, highlight the efficacy, tolerability, and increase in disease-free survival associated with this novel agent when combined with trastuzumab.ConclusionThe pertuzumab and trastuzumab anti-HER2 dual blockade is likely to represent a substantial advance for patients with HER2-positive BCs and a new milestone on the way to personalized medicine.     

Do all patients with advanced HER2 positive breast cancer need upfront-chemo when receiving trastuzumab? Randomized phase III trial SAKK 22/99

BackgroundHER2-targeted therapy plus chemotherapy is standard treatment in advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Trastuzumab alone followed by addition of chemotherapy at disease progression versus upfront combination therapy has not been elucidated.Patients and methodsOne-hundred seventy-five patients with measurable/evaluable HER2+ advanced disease without previous HER2-directed therapy were randomized to trastuzumab alone followed, at disease progression, by the combination with chemotherapy (Arm A) or upfront trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (Arm B). Chemotherapy could be stopped after ≥6 cycles in responding patients, trastuzumab was continued until progression. The primary endpoint of this superiority trial was time to progression (TTP) on combined trastuzumab-chemotherapy (Combination-TTP) in both arms. Secondary endpoints included response rate, TTP, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity.ResultsCombination-TTP was longer than expected in both arms, 12.2 months in Arm A and 10.3 months in Arm B and not significantly different (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7; 95% CI 0.5–1.1; P =0.1). Overall survival was also not significantly different (HR 0.9; 95% CI 0.6–1.5; P=0.55). In Arm A, the median TTP before introduction of chemotherapy was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3–5.4), yet at 2 years 6% of patients were still on trastuzumab alone. Patients without visceral disease had a Combination-TTP of 21.8 months in arm A, compared with 10.1 months in arm B (unplanned analysis HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1–4.2, P = 0.03). Patients with visceral disease showed no difference. Toxicity was chemotherapy-related.ConclusionThe outcome of patients receiving sequential trastuzumab-chemotherapy or upfront combination was similar. We failed to demonstrate superiority of the sequential approach. These results nevertheless suggest chemotherapy and its toxicity can be deferred, especially in patients with indolent, non-visceral disease. Despite a larger non-inferiority confirmatory study would be needed, these findings represent an additional proof of concept that de-escalation strategies can be discussed in individual patients.     

Combination of radiotherapy and double blockade HER2 with pertuzumab and trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic or locally recurrent unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: Assessment of early toxicity

Background and purposes

We evaluate the early toxicity of concurrent use of radiotherapy, pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic or locally recurrent unresectable breast cancer.

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic in triple negative breast cancer and predictive for trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer: results from the FinHER trial

BackgroundWe have previously shown the prognostic importance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) using tumor samples from a large clinical trial cohort. In this study, we aimed to validate these findings and also investigate associations with trastuzumab benefit in HER2-overexpressing disease (HER2+).Patients and methodsA prospective–retrospective study was conducted using samples from the FinHER adjuvant, phase III trial that enrolled 1010 early-stage BC patients, 778 of whom were HER2-nonamplified. Those with HER2+ disease (n = 232) were randomized to 9 weeks of trastuzumab or no trastuzumab in addition to chemotherapy. Two pathologists independently quantified stromal TILs in 935 (92.6%) available slides. The primary end point of distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and interactions with trastuzumab were studied in Cox regression models.ResultsConfirming our previous findings, in TNBC (n = 134) each 10% increase in TILs was significantly associated with decreased distant recurrence in TNBC; for DDFS the hazard ratio adjusted for clinicopathological factors: 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–0.98, P = 0.02. In HER2+ BC (n = 209), each 10% increase in lymphocytic infiltration was significantly associated with decreased distant recurrence in patients randomized to the trastuzumab arm (DDFS P_interaction = 0.025).ConclusionsHigher levels of TILs present at diagnosis were significantly associated with decreased distant recurrence rates in primary TNBC. These results confirm our previous data and further support that TILs should be considered as a robust prognostic factor in this BC subtype. We also report for the first time an association between higher levels of TILs and increased trastuzumab benefit in HER2+ disease. Further research into why some TN and HER2+ BCs can or cannot generate a host antitumor immune response and how trastuzumab can favorably alter the immune microenvironment is warranted.     

Association du double blocage de HER2 et radiothérapie dans la prise en charge du cancer du sein exprimant HER2

PurposeThe tolerance of the concurrent use of radiotherapy, pertuzumab and trastuzumab is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity of this association in patients treated for HER2 positive metastatic and/or locally recurrent unrespectable breast cancer.Material and methodsA retrospective study was performed in our institution for all consecutive patients treated with concurrent irradiation, pertuzumab and trastuzumab. The radiotherapy was performed while pertuzumab and trastuzumab were administrated as a maintenance treatment at the dose of 420 mg (total dose) and 6 mg/kg respectively every 3 weeks without chemotherapy. Toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured at baseline and then every 3–4 months.ResultsWe studied 77 patients. treated in between 2013 and 2019 with median follow-up of 38 months (range 0–264 months). Median age was 53 years (33–86). There were 50 patients (64.9%) with metastatic and 27 patients (35.1%) with recurrent disease. All patients received docetaxel followed by P–T as first line treatment and they received 34 cycles (10–85) of pertuzumab and trastuzumab. All patients experienced partial or complete response according to RECIST criteria. Irradiation volumes were whole breast (41 patients, 53.2%) and chest wall (29 patients, 37.7%) at a dose of 50 Gy with a median duration of 39 days. Radiotherapy of lymph nodes was performed in 53 patients (68.8%) as following: supraclavicular–infraclavicular and axillary lymph nodes in 52 patients (67.5%), and internal mammary nodes in 31 patients (40.3%). For 20 patients. (26.0%) radiotherapy was palliative: bone irradiation (12 patients, 15.6%), whole-brain radiotherapy (2 patients, 2.6%), cerebral metastasis irradiation (6 patients). As early toxicity we observed: radio dermatitis as following: 36 patients (46.8%) presented grade I, 17 patients (22.1%) presented grade II, and 3 patients (3.9%) presented grade III. One patient (1.3%) presented grade II esophagitis. One patient (1.3%) presented asymptomatic decrease of LVEF during treatment and 6 patients (7.7%) presented a decrease of LVEF. There was no radiation-induced pneumonitis. As late toxicity, we observed 1 (1.3%) case of grade I and 1 (1.3%) with grade II telangiectasia. There was 1 case (1.3%) of grade III cardiac toxicity, 8 months after the concurrent treatment.ConclusionThe concurrent use of radiotherapy, pertuzumab and trastuzumab is feasible with good tolerance. Larger prospective data with longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results.     

Cardiac toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with dual HER2 blockade

Although dual HER2 blockade shows promising results in patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer it is unclear whether this treatment strategy increases the risk for cardiac adverse events. We conducted a meta‐analysis of randomized trials to investigate the risk of cardiac adverse events when a combination of anti‐HER2 therapies compared to anti‐HER2 monotherapy. We searched Medline, the Cochrane library, as well as the electronic abstract databases of the major international congresses' proceedings to identify randomized trials that evaluated the administration of anti‐HER2 monotherapy (lapatinib or trastuzumab or pertuzumab) versus anti‐HER2 combination (pertuzumab plus trastuzumab or trastuzumab plus lapatinib) therapy in breast cancer. The trials were considered eligible if the only systematic difference between the study arms was the type of anti‐HER2 therapy used. Study outcomes were the congestive heart failure (CHF) grade ≥3 and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline <50% or more than 10% from baseline. Six trials were considered eligible. Overall incidence results for CHF in the combined anti‐HER2 therapy and the anti‐HER2 monotherapy were 0.88% (95% CI: 0.47–1.64%) and 1.49% (95% CI: 0.98–2.23%). The incidence of LVEF decline was 3.1% (95% CI: 2.2–4.4%) and 2.9% (95% CI: 2.1–4.1%), respectively. The OR of CHF between anti‐HER2 combination and monotherapy was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.26–1.27, p‐value= 0.17) while the OR of LVEF decline was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.53–1.48, p‐value= 0.64). This meta‐analysis provides evidence supporting comparable cardiac toxicity between anti‐HER2 combination therapy and anti‐HER2 monotherapy.     

Incidence of central nervous system metastases in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with pertuzumab,trastuzumab, and docetaxel: results from the randomized phase III study CLEOPATRA

BackgroundResults from the phase III trial CLEOPATRA in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive first-line metastatic breast cancer demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free and overall survival with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel over placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel. We carried out exploratory analyses of the incidence and time to development of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients from CLEOPATRA.Patients and methodsPatients received pertuzumab/placebo: 840 mg in cycle 1, then 420 mg; trastuzumab: 8 mg/kg in cycle 1, then 6 mg/kg; docetaxel: initiated at 75 mg/m². Study drugs were administered i.v. every 3 weeks. The log-rank test was used for between-arm comparisons of time to CNS metastases as first site of disease progression and overall survival in patients with CNS metastases as first site of disease progression. The Kaplan–Meier approach was used to estimate median time to CNS metastases as first site of disease progression and median overall survival.ResultsThe incidence of CNS metastases as first site of disease progression was similar between arms; placebo arm: 51 of 406 (12.6%), pertuzumab arm: 55 of 402 (13.7%). Median time to development of CNS metastases as first site of disease progression was 11.9 months in the placebo arm and 15.0 months in the pertuzumab arm; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39–0.85, P = 0.0049. Overall survival in patients who developed CNS metastases as first site of disease progression showed a trend in favor of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel; HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.39–1.11. Median overall survival was 26.3 versus 34.4 months in the placebo and pertuzumab arms, respectively. Treatment comparison of the survival curves was not statistically significant for the log-rank test (P = 0.1139), but significant for the Wilcoxon test (P = 0.0449).ConclusionsWhile the incidence of CNS metastases was similar between arms, our results suggest that pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel delays the onset of CNS disease compared with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel.ClinicalTrials.govNCT00567190.