Comparison of Opioid Medication Use after Conventional Chemoembolization versus Drug-Eluting Embolic Chemoembolization

PurposeTo assess the use of opioid analgesics and/or antiemetic drugs for pain and nausea following selective chemoembolization with doxorubicin-based conventional (c)-transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting embolic (DEE)-transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsFrom October 2014 to 2016, 283 patients underwent 393 selective chemoembolization procedures including 188 patients (48%) who underwent c-transarterial chemoembolization and 205 (52%) who underwent DEE-transarterial chemoembolization. Medical records for all patients were retrospectively reviewed. Administration of postprocedural opioid and/or antiemetic agents were collated. Time of administration was stratified as phase 1 recovery (0–6 hours) and observation (6–24 hours). Logistic regression model was used to investigate the relationship of transarterial chemoembolization type and use of intravenous and/or oral analgesic and antiemetic medications while controlling for other clinical variables.ResultsMore patients treated with DEE-transarterial chemoembolization required intravenous analgesia in the observation (6–24 hours) phase (18.5%) than those treated with c-transarterial chemoembolization (10.6%; P = .033). Similar results were noted for oral analgesic agents (50.2% vs. 31.4%, respectively; P < .001) and antiemetics (17.1% vs. 7.5%, respectively; P = .006) during the observation period. Multivariate regression models identified DEE-transarterial chemoembolization as an independent predictor for oral analgesia (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; P = .011), for intravenous and oral analgesia in opioid-naïve patients (OR, 2.46; P = .029) and for antiemetics (OR, 2.56; P = .011).ConclusionsCompared to c-transarterial chemoembolization, DEE-transarterial chemoembolization required greater amounts of opioid analgesic and antiemetic agents 6–24 hours after the procedure. Surgical data indicate that a persistent opioid habit can develop even after minor surgeries, therefore, caution should be exercised, and a regimen of nonopiate pain medications should be considered to reduce postprocedural pain after transarterial chemoembolization.     

Spectral CT-Based Iodized Oil Quantification to Predict Tumor Response Following Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeTo quantify iodized oil retention in tumors after transarterial chemoembolization using spectral computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and evaluate its performance in predicting 12-month tumor responses.Materials and MethodsFrom September 2017 to December 2018, 111 patients with HCC underwent initial conventional transarterial chemoembolization. Immediately after the procedure, unenhanced CT was performed using a spectral CT scanner, and the iodized oil densities in index tumors were measured. In tumor-level analyses, a threshold level of iodized oil density in the tumors was calculated using clustered receiver operating characteristic curve analyses to predict the 12-month tumor responses. In patient-level analyses, significant factors associated with a 12-month complete response, including the presence of tumors below the threshold value (ie, suspected residual tumors), were evaluated by logistic regression.ResultsForty-eight HCCs in 39 patients were included in the analyses. The lower 10th percentile of the iodine density was identified as the threshold for determining the 12-month nonviable responses. The area under the curve of the iodine density measurements in predicting the 12-month nonviable responses was 0.893 (95% confidence interval, 0.797–0.989). The threshold value of the iodine density of 10.68 mg/mL yielded a sensitivity of 82.76% and specificity of 94.74% (P < .001). In the patient-level analysis, the 12-month complete response was significantly associated with the presence of a suspected residual tumor, with an odds ratio of 72.0 (95% confidence interval, 7.273–712.770).ConclusionsSpectral CT imaging using quantitative analysis of the iodized oil retention in target HCCs can predict tumor responses after a conventional transarterial chemoembolization procedure.     

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Interventional Liver-Directed Therapies for a Single,Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates

PurposeTo assess the cost effectiveness of 3 main locoregional therapies (LRTs) (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE], transarterial radioembolization [TARE], and percutaneous ablation) as bridging therapy.Materials and MethodsA cost-effectiveness analysis was performed comparing the 3 LRTs for patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a diameter of 3 cm or less over a 5-year time horizon from a payer’s perspective. The clinical courses, including transplantation, decompensation resulting in delisting, and the need for a second LRT, were based on data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (2016–2019). Costs and effectiveness were measured in U.S. dollars and quality-adjusted life-years, respectively. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsA total of 2,594, 1,576, and 903 patients underwent TACE, ablation, and TARE, respectively. Ablation was the dominant strategy, with the lowest expected cost and highest effectiveness. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that ablation was the most cost-effective strategy in 93.9% of simulations. A subgroup analysis was performed for different wait times, with ablation remaining the most cost-effective strategy. The sensitivity analysis showed that ablation was most effective if the risk of waitlist dropout was less than 2.00% and the rate of transplantation was more than 15.1% quarterly. TARE was most effective if the risk of dropout was less than 1.19% and the rate of transplantation was more than 24.0%. TACE was most effective if the risk of dropout was less than 1.01% and the rate of transplantation was more than 45.7%. Ablation remained the most cost-effective modality until its procedural cost was more than $34,843.ConclusionsAblation is the most cost-effective bridging strategy for patients with a single, small (≤3 cm) HCC prior to liver transplantation. The conclusion remained robust in multiple sensitivity analyses.     

Integrated Liver Inflammatory Score Predicts the Therapeutic Outcome of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transarterial Chemoembolization

PurposeTo evaluate the performance of the integrated liver inflammatory score (ILIS) in predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received transarterial chemoembolization, and to compare ILIS to other prognostic scoring systems and inflammatory indices.Materials and MethodsThis study included 192 patients with unresectable HCC who underwent transarterial chemoembolization from 3 medical centers. The potential risk factors of the patients’ overall survival (OS) were determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The predictive performances of ILIS in 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. The discriminatory power in the OS of ILIS and the other known scoring systems or inflammatory indices was determined by C-statistic.ResultsMultivariate regression analysis showed that high ILIS (P = .047), low lymphocyte count (P = .034), beyond up-to-seven criteria (P = .021), and nonresponse to the first transarterial chemoembolization session (P = .039) were risk factors for poor prognosis after transarterial chemoembolization. The predictive performances of ILIS for 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival were good, with area under the curve values of 0.627, 0.631, 0.621, 0.577, and 0.681, respectively. ILIS outperformed other standard scoring systems and inflammatory indices in predicting OS, with a C-statistic of 0.625.ConclusionsILIS is a powerful prognostic index for predicting the survival of patients with HCC after transarterial chemoembolization, which suggests that ILIS before treatment should be considered during the patient evaluation process.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization Using 100-μm Drug-Eluting Microspheres in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Study and Midterm Follow-up

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting embolic (DEE) transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who are ineligible for curative treatment, using doxorubicin-loaded Tandem (Varian Medical) microspheres.Materials and MethodsBetween October 2015 and December 2017, 98 patients with unresectable HCC (69 males, 29 females; mean age, 60.5 ± 10.0 years of age; and American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage ≦T3a) treated with DEE transarterial chemoembolization using 100-μm doxorubicin-loaded microspheres were enrolled prospectively. All studies were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging 1 month after treatment was used for tumor response assessment according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and downstaging profile.ResultsMedian follow-up was 21.2 months. At follow-up examinations at 0.5-, 1-, 1.5- and 2.5-year follow-up, OS rates were 93.8%, 89.5%, 79.4%, and 77.0%, respectively. Complete response (CR), partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were noted in 50 (51.0%), 23 (23.5%), 18 (18.4%), and 7 (7.1%) patients, respectively, with 93.9% disease control rate and 74.5% objective response rate. Mean OS was 28.7 months, and mean PFS was 19.6 months. Number of nodules >3, bilobar disease, larger tumor, and higher AJCC stage correlated with worse CR. No serious adverse events occurred after DEE transarterial chemoembolization. Successful downstage rate was 73.3% (22 of 30) and number of nodules predicting successful downstaging was 7 nodules (cutoff).ConclusionsTandem DEE transarterial chemoembolization provides safe and effective treatment for HCC and a bridge or downstage therapy for liver transplantation.     

Prostatic Artery Embolization Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

PurposeTo compare the cost effectiveness of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) with that of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of medically refractory benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Materials and MethodsA cost-effectiveness analysis with Markov modeling was performed, comparing the clinical course after PAE with that after TURP for 3 years. Probabilities were obtained from the available literature, and costs were based on Medicare reimbursements and published cost analyses. Outcomes were measured using quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Statistical analyses included base case calculation, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and deterministic sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of the conclusion under different clinical scenarios.ResultsBase case calculation showed comparable outcomes (PAE, 2.845 QALY; TURP, 2.854 QALY), with a cost difference of $3,104 (PAE, $2,934; TURP, $6,038). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $360,249/QALY. PAE was dominant in 23.2% and more cost effective in 48.4% of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations. PAE was better if its recurrence risk was <20.4% per year and even when the TURP recurrence risk was assumed to be 0%. TURP would be more cost effective when its procedural cost was <$3,367 or the PAE procedural cost >$4,409. PAE remained cost effective when varying the risks and costs of the minor and major short-term or long-term adverse events of both procedures. TURP would be the better strategy if the utility of BPH recurrence was <0.85 QALY.ConclusionsPAE is a cost-effective strategy to treat medically refractory BPH, resulting in comparable health benefits at a lower cost than that of TURP even when accounting for extreme alterations in adverse events, costs, and recurrence rates.     

Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Using Fluorouracil,Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin versus Transarterial Chemoembolization as Initial Treatment for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score–Matching Analysis

PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with a modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX) regimen with that of transarterial chemoembolization as a locoregional treatment for patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsThis retrospective study included adult patients with locally advanced HCC who received first-line treatment with either HAIC-mFOLFOX or conventional transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy from January 2015 to December 2016. The outcomes, including tumor response rates, evaluated via imaging assessment using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; overall survival; progression-free survival; and safety, were compared. The propensity score–matching methodology was used to reduce the influence of confounding factors on the outcomes.ResultsThe study included 131 patients with locally advanced HCC who underwent transarterial chemoembolization and 101 who received HAIC-mFOLFOX as initial treatment. After propensity score matching (n = 67 in each group), patients who received HAIC-mFOLFOX had a higher objective response rate (43.3% vs 13.4%, P = .001), longer median overall survival (13.9 vs 6.0 months, P < .001), and longer median progression-free survival (6.4 vs 2.8 months, P = .001) than those who underwent transarterial chemoembolization. The survival benefit with HAIC-mFOLFOX was strengthened in patients with HCC with vascular invasion (hazard ratio: 0.379; 95% confidence interval: 0.237–0.607). HAIC-mFOLFOX was associated with lower incidences of severe adverse events (8.9% vs 22.9%) and liver toxicity than transarterial chemoembolization.ConclusionsCompared with transarterial chemoembolization, HAIC-mFOLFOX is a potentially safer and more effective locoregional therapy for patients with locally advanced HCC.     

Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Tirapazamine Chemoembolization for Unresectable Early- and Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeTo investigate the safety of replacing doxorubicin with tirapazamine in conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in an Asian population with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to determine the optimal tirapazamine dose for phase II studies.Materials and MethodsThis was a phase I, 3 + 3 dose-escalation study for patients with unresectable early- and intermediate-stage HCC who received 5, 10, or 20 mg/m² of intra-arterial (IA) tirapazamine followed by ethiodized oil/gelatin sponge-based embolization. Key eligibilities included HCCs no more than 10 cm in diameter, prior embolization allowed, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, Child-Pugh score of 5–7, and platelet count of ≥60,000 μL. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 3 nonhematological or grade 4 hematological toxicity, with the exception of transient elevation of aminotransferase levels after the procedure.ResultsSeventeen patients were enrolled, 59% of whom had progression from a prior HCC therapy and 35% of whom had progression or recurrence after TACE. All patients tolerated the tirapazamine TACE well without any DLT or serious adverse event. Using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, the complete response (CR) rate was 47%, and the CR + partial response rate was 65%. The median duration of response was not reached. The median time to progression was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval, 5.1–not reached). The median overall survival was 29.3 months. The selected phase II dose was set at a fixed dose of 35 mg of IA tirapazamine.ConclusionsIA tirapazamine with transarterial embolization was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy signals in intermediate-stage HCC, justifying pursuit of a phase II study.     

Microwave Ablation versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

PurposeTo assess the cost effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with inoperable stage I non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and MethodsA literature search was performed in MEDLINE with broad search clusters. A decision-analytic model was constructed over a 5-year period. The model incorporated treatment-related complications and long-term recurrence. All clinical parameters were derived from the literature with preference to long-term prospective trials. A healthcare payers’ perspective was adopted. Outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) extracted from prior studies and U.S. dollars from Medicare reimbursements and prior studies. Base case calculations, probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, and multiple 1- and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsMWA yielded a health benefit of 2.31 QALYs at a cost of $195,331, whereas SBRT yielded a health benefit of 2.33 QALYs at a cost of $225,271. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $1,480,597/QALY, indicating that MWA is the more cost-effective strategy. The conclusion remains unchanged in probabilistic sensitivity analysis with MWA being the optimal cost strategy in 99.84% simulations. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that MWA remains cost effective when its annual recurrence risk is <18.4% averaged over 5 years, when the SBRT annual recurrence risk is >1.44% averaged over 5 years, or when MWA is at least $7,500 cheaper than SBRT.ConclusionsMWA appears to be more cost effective than SBRT for patients with inoperable stage I NSCLC.     

Clinical Significance of the Initial and Best Responses after Chemoembolization in the Treatment of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Preserved Liver Function

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical implications of initial and best responses during repeated transarterial chemoembolization procedures for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsThis study included 726 patients who received a diagnosis of intermediate-stage HCC with Child-Pugh class A liver function between 2007 and 2016, and who were treated with transarterial chemoembolization as the first-line treatment. Evaluation of treatment response was based on the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Overall survival (OS) was compared between response categories after implementation of landmark analysis.ResultsOf the 726 patients, an objective response (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) was observed as the initial response in 78.1% of patients. Regarding the best response during the transarterial chemoembolization series, 87.2% of patients were overall responders. The median OS of initial responders (n = 483) was not significantly different from that of subsequent responders at the 1-year landmark (stable disease [SD] after first transarterial chemoembolization but CR or PR after repeated transarterial chemoembolization; n = 61; 46.2 vs 40.1 months, respectively; P = .145). Likewise, the median OS of initial CR patients (n = 326) was not significantly different from that of the subsequent CR group (n = 126) at the 1-year landmark (PR or SD after first transarterial chemoembolization but CR after repeated transarterial chemoembolization; 53.4 vs 46.3 months, respectively; P = .455). Multivariate Cox analyses showed that the objective responses, the initial responses (hazard ratio [HR], 0.638; P = .001), and the best responses (HR, 0.304; P < .001) had the significant prognostic significance for OS.ConclusionsBoth the initial and best responses during repeated transarterial chemoembolization were significantly associated with OS in patients with intermediate-stage HCC and preserved liver function.     

A Transarterial Chemoembolization of Balloon-Occluded Alternate Infusions of Cisplatin and Gelatin Particles for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase I/II Multicenter Prospective Study of Safety and Efficacy

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of a newly developed technique of balloon-occluded alternate infusions of cisplatin and gelatin particles in transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate the liver damage following the procedure.Materials and MethodsForty-three patients with HCC from 4 medical centers were enrolled in this multicenter prospective study. Of these, 41 patients were observed for 6 months following balloon-occluded alternate infusion transarterial chemoembolization. The primary endpoint was the safety of the procedure, and the secondary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) of the HCCs at 2 months following treatment.ResultsThree patients experienced adverse events, including 1 patient with facial swelling and skin rash, dissection of the celiac artery, and bland portal vein thrombus. No major adverse events were identified. Two (5.3%) patients regressed from a Child-Pugh classification of A to B. The balloon-occluded alternate infusion transarterial chemoembolization treatment achieved a 22.0% complete response (CR) rate and a 73.2% ORR (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.9%–84.4%). In a retrospective analysis of 23 patients with HCCs above the up-to-7 criteria, the CR rate and ORR of the balloon-occluded alternate infusion transarterial chemoembolization were 21.7% and 82.6% (95% CI, 62.3%–93.6%), respectively.ConclusionsBalloon-occluded alternate infusion transarterial chemoembolization is safe and effective for achieving a high ORR while preserving liver function.     

Cost Effectiveness of External Beam Radiation Therapy versus Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation for Palliation of Uncomplicated Bone Metastases

PurposeTo evaluate the cost effectiveness of incorporating cryoablation in the treatment regimens for uncomplicated bone metastases using radiation therapy (RT) in single-fraction RT (SFRT) or multiple-fraction RT (MFRT) regimens.Materials and MethodsA Markov model was constructed using 1-month cycles over a lifetime horizon to compare the cost effectiveness of multiple strategies, including RT followed by RT (RT-RT) for recurrent pain, RT followed by cryoablation (RT-ablation), and cryoablation followed by RT (ablation-RT). RT-RT consisted of 8 Gy in 1 fraction/8 Gy in 1 fraction (SFRT-SFRT) and 30 Gy in 10 fractions/20 Gy in 5 fractions (MFRT-MFRT). Probabilities and utilities were extracted from a search of the medical literature. Costs were calculated from a payer perspective using 2017 Medicare reimbursement in an outpatient setting. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated using strategies evaluated for willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). To account for model uncertainty, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsIn the base case analysis, SFRT-ablation was cost effective relative to SFRT-SFRT at $96,387/QALY. MFRT-ablation was cost effective relative to MFRT-MFRT at $85,576/QALY. Ablation-SFRT and ablation-MFRT were not cost effective with ICERs >$100,000/QALY. In one-way sensitivity analyses, results were highly sensitive to variation in multiple model parameters, including median survival (base: 9 months), with SFRT-SFRT favored at median survival ≤8.7 months. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis examining SFRT-based regimens showed that SFRT-ablation was preferred in 36.9% of simulations at WTP of $100,000/QALY.ConclusionsCryoablation is a potentially cost-effective alternative to reirradiation with RT for recurrent of pain following RT; however, no strategy incorporating initial cryoablation was cost effective.     

Transarterial Radioembolization versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Percutaneous Ablation for Unresectable,Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma of ≥3 cm: A Propensity Score–Matched Study

PurposeTo compare the safety and effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic agents combined with percutaneous ablation (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] + ablation) in the treatment of treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of ≥3 cm.Materials and MethodsTwenty-nine patients with treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm received combined TACE + ablation, and 40 patients received TARE at a single institution. Local tumor response, tumor progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, need for reintervention, bridge to transplant, and major complications were compared. Clinical variables and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsBefore PSM, patients who underwent TARE had a larger tumor size (3.7 vs 5.5 cm; P = .0005) and were older (61.5 vs 69.3 years; P = .0014). After PSM, there was no difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, with the mean tumor sizes measuring 3.9 and 4.1 cm in the TACE + ablation and TARE cohorts, respectively. After PSM (n = 19 in each group), no statistically significant difference was observed in local radiological response (disease control rates, 100% vs 94.7%; P = .31), survival (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–1.80; P = .469), PFS (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21–1.71; P = .342), bridge to transplant (21.1% vs 31.6%, P = .46), and major adverse event rates (15.8% vs 10.5%, P = .63) between the 2 groups. The mean total number of locoregional interventions was higher in the TACE + ablation cohort (1.9 vs 1.3 sessions, P = .02), with an earlier median reintervention trend (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.20–1.32; P = .167).ConclusionsThe present study showed that TARE and the combination of TACE and ablation are comparable in safety and effectiveness for treating treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm.     

γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase as a Prognostic Biomarker in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization

PurposeTo evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment serum γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) level in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving transarterial chemoembolization.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 140 patients (123 male, 17 female; mean age, 56.9 y ± 12.0; range, 22.0–82.0 y) with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer class C HCC who received first-line conventional chemoembolization between December 2013 and March 2018. Patients were divided into low and high GGT groups based on a cutoff value calculated with a receiver operating characteristic curve. Overall survival (OS) was compared between groups by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed.ResultsThe optimal cutoff values of GGT were 119.5 U/L in men and 175.0 U/L in women. The 6-, 9-, and 12-mo OS rates were 81.7%, 72.4%, and 62.9%, respectively, for patients in the low GGT group (n = 44) and 58.8%, 35.7%, and 28.8%, respectively, for patients in the high GGT group (n = 96; P < .001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified high pretreatment serum GGT level (hazard ratio [HR], 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67–4.40; P < .001), multiple tumors (HR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.23–7.53; P = .02), and performance of target treatment (ie, sorafenib; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24–0.72; P = .002) or ablation (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18–0.66; P = .001) as independent prognostic factors for OS.ConclusionsPretreatment serum GGT level was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced HCC treated with chemoembolization, suggesting that GGT is a useful prognostic biomarker for advanced HCC.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization Followed by Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Impact of the Time Interval between the Two Treatments on Outcome

PurposeTo compare the efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation after transarterial chemoembolization within or beyond 30 days for medium-large or multiple recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).Materials and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study conducted from 2007 through 2015, 135 patients with a single recurrent HCC (>3 cm) or multiple (2–5 tumors) recurrent HCCs underwent transarterial chemoembolization plus RF ablation. A total of 62 patients underwent RF ablation after transarterial chemoembolization within 30 days (sequential group) and 73 patients underwent RF ablation after transarterial chemoembolization beyond 30 days (delayed group). Outcomes of interests included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complete response (CR) rate.ResultsThe median OS and PFS were 49.8 and 38.0 months for sequential group, and 31.0 and 11.6 months for the delayed group. The sequential group experienced significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.517; P = .002) and PFS (HR, 0.621; P = .021). Among patients with multiple tumors or a single tumor >5 cm, the sequential group still had significantly longer OS (P = .022; P = .018, respectively) and PFS (P = 0.042; P = .036, respectively) than the delayed group, although no significant differences were observed among patients with solitary 3- to 5-cm tumors (P = .138; P = .803, respectively). The sequential group had a significantly better CR rate than the delayed group (85.4% vs. 68.5%, respectively; P = .035). Significant predictors of OS and PFS included maximum tumor size, number of tumors, and time interval between transarterial chemoembolization and RF ablation.ConclusionsTransarterial chemoembolization plus sequential RF ablation within 30 days was more effective for recurrent HCCs than transarterial chemoembolization plus delayed RF ablation. The time interval within 30 days is required for treating large or multiple HCCs but may not be necessary for solitary medium-sized HCC.     

Intra-Arterial Therapy for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), conventional transarterial chemoembolization, drug-eluting embolic transarterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE), transarterial radioembolization, and their combinations with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.MethodsA search was conducted on Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science for prospective nonrandomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to June 20, 2020. Survival data of patients were recovered from original Kaplan-Meier curves by exploiting a graphical reconstructive algorithm. One-stage meta-analyses were conducted for the median overall survival (OS), survival rates (SRs), and restricted mean survival time (RMST), whereas two-stage meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to determine response rates (RRs) and conversion to resection rates (CRRs).ResultsA total of 71 prospective nonrandomized studies and 21 RCTs were identified, comprising 6,695 patients. Among patients treated beyond the first-line, DEE-TACE + SCT (n = 152) had the best survival outcomes of median OS of 26.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.5–29.1) months and a 3-year RMST of 23.6 (95% CI, 21.8–25.5) months. Upon further stratification by publication year, DEE-TACE + SCT appeared to consistently have the highest pooled SRs at 1 year (81.9%) and 2 years (66.1%) in recent publications (2015–2020). DEE-TACE + SCT and HAI + SCT had the highest pooled RRs of 56.7% (I² = 0.90) and 62.6% (I² = 0.87) and pooled CRRs of 35.5% (I² = 0.00) and 30.3% (I² = 0.80), respectively.ConclusionsAlbeit significant heterogeneity, the paucity of high-quality evidence, and the noncomparative nature of all analyses, the overall evidence suggests that patients treated with DEE-TACE + SCT have the best oncological outcomes and greatest potential to be converted for resection.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization in a Woodchuck Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeTo assess the feasibility of transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic (DEE) microspheres in a woodchuck model of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsNine woodchucks were studied: 4 normal animals and 5 animals infected with woodchuck hepatitis virus in which HCC had developed. Three animals with HCC underwent multidetector CT. A 3-F sheath was introduced into the femoral artery, and the hepatic arteries were selectively catheterized with 2.0–2.4-F microcatheters. Normal animals underwent diagnostic angiography and bland embolization. Animals with HCC underwent DEE transarterial chemoembolization with 70–150-μm radiopaque microspheres loaded with 37.5 mg doxorubicin per milliliter. Cone-beam CT and multidetector CT were performed. Following euthanasia, explanted livers underwent micro-CT, histopathologic examination, and fluorescence imaging of doxorubicin.ResultsThe tumors were hypervascular and supplied by large-caliber tortuous vessels, with arteriovenous shunts present in 2 animals. There was heterogeneous enhancement on multidetector CT with areas of necrosis. Six tumors were identified. The most common location was the right medial lobe (n = 3). Mean tumor volume was 30.7 cm³ ± 12.3. DEE chemoembolization of tumors was achieved. Excluding the 2 animals with arteriovenous shunts, the mean volume of DEE microspheres injected was 0.49 mL ± 0.17. Fluorescence imaging showed diffusion of doxorubicin from the DEE microspheres into the tumor.ConclusionsWoodchuck HCC shares imaging appearances and biologic characteristics with human HCC. Selective catheterization and DEE chemoembolization may similarly be performed. Woodchucks may be used to model interventional therapies and possibly characterize radiologic–pathologic correlations.     

Robot-Assisted Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using a Coaxial Microcatheter Driving Controller-Responder Robot System: Clinical Pilot Study

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a new coaxial microcatheter driving controller-responder robot (CRR) system.Materials and MethodsA single-center prospective pilot study approved by the institutional review board was conducted using this CRR developed after analyzing 20 cases of conventional TACE procedures from May to October 2021. The study included 10 patients with HCCs: 5 (median age, 72 years; range, 64–73 years) underwent robot-assisted TACE, and 5 (median age, 57 years; range, 44–76 years) underwent conventional TACE for comparison. The feasibility and safety of robot-assisted TACE were evaluated by assessing the technical success, procedure time, adverse event rate, radiation dose, and early tumor response.ResultsThe entire TACE procedure was divided into 30 steps, of which 8 could be robotized. In robot-assisted TACE, technical success was achieved in 4 (80%) of 5 patients. No procedure-related adverse event was observed. The median procedure time was 56 minutes. At the 1-month follow-up, 3 of the 4 patients showed a complete or partial response after robot-assisted TACE. The median radiation doses for the operator and patients were 0.4 and 2,167.5 μSv in robot-assisted TACE and 53.2 and 2,989.7 μSv in conventional TACE, respectively.ConclusionsRobot-assisted TACE using a new CRR system was feasible and safe for the treatment of HCC and could remarkably decrease radiation exposure for the operators.     

Chronic Hepatotoxicity in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Transarterial Radioembolization

PurposeTo compare the manifestations of chronic liver injury following transarterial chemoembolization with those of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET).Materials and MethodsThis study consisted of an Institutional Review Board-approved single-institution retrospective analysis of NET patients who received transarterial chemoembolization from 2006 to 2016 and TARE from 2005 to 2014 and survived at least 1 year from the initial treatment. Patients receiving only transarterial chemoembolization (n = 63) or TARE (n = 28) were evaluated for the presence or absence of durable hepatic toxicities occurring at least 6 months after initial treatment. The definitions and grades of liver injury were adapted from Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 and were characterized by the presence of laboratory or clinical toxicities of Grade 3 or above.ResultsChronic hepatic toxicity occurred in 14 of 63 transarterial chemoembolization patients (22%) with a total of 26 Grade 3-4 events, in whom elevation of bilirubin was the most common toxicity, compared to 8 of 28 TARE patients (29%) with a total of 16 Grade 3-4 and 2 Grade 5 events, in whom ascites were the most frequent toxicity. There were more laboratory toxicities in the transarterial chemoembolization group (65% vs 38%, P = .11) and fewer Grade 4–5 injuries (6% vs 27% of patients, P = .06). There was also a significantly higher number of patients who experienced intrahepatic progression of disease in the transarterial chemoembolization cohort than in the TARE patients (75% vs 43%, respectively; P = .005).ConclusionsDelayed hepatotoxicity from transarterial chemoembolization and TARE occurred in 22% and 29% of patients, respectively, from 6 months to several years following treatment. Transarterial chemoembolization-related toxicities on average were less severe and manifested primarily as laboratory derangements, compared to TARE toxicities which consisted of clinical hepatic decompensation.     

Safety and Efficacy of Locoregional Treatment during Immunotherapy with Nivolumab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of 41 Interventions in 29 Patients

PurposeTo assess the safety of locoregional treatment (LRT) combined with nivolumab for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective review included 29 patients undergoing 41 LRTs—transarterial chemoembolization or yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization—60 days before or concurrently with nivolumab. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory values and adverse events were reviewed before and after nivolumab initiation and after each LRT. Treatment response and time to progression were assessed using Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Clinical events, including nivolumab termination, death, and time of last follow-up, were assessed.ResultsOver a median nivolumab course of 8.1 months (range, 1.0–30) with a median of 14.2 2-week cycles (range, 1–53), predominantly Child–Pugh A (22/29) patients—12 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B and 17 BCLC C—underwent 20 transarterial chemoembolization and 21 transarterial radioembolization LRTs at a median of 67 days (range, 48–609) after nivolumab initiation. Ten patients underwent multiple LRTs. During a median follow-up of 11.5 months (range, 1.8–35.1), no grade III/IV adverse events attributable to nivolumab were observed. There were five instances of grade III/IV hypoalbuminemia or hyperbilirubinemia within 3 months after LRT. There were no nivolumab-related deaths, and 30-day mortality after LRT was 0%.ConclusionsLRTs performed concurrently with nivolumab immunotherapy demonstrate an acceptable safety profile in patients with intermediate and advanced HCC.