The active and the inactive form of the hAT1 receptor have an identical ligand-binding environment: an MPA study on a constitutively active angiotensin II receptor mutant

Several models of activation mechanisms were proposed for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), yet no direct methods exist for their elucidation. The availability of constitutively active mutants has given an opportunity to study active receptor conformations within acceptable limits using models such as the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1)1 receptor mutant N111G-hAT1 which displays an important constitutive activity. Recently, by using methionine proximity assay, we showed for the hAT1 receptor that TMD III, VI, and VII form the ligand-binding pocket of the C-terminal amino acid of an antagonistic AngII analogue. In the present contribution, we investigated whether the same residues would also constitute the ligand-binding contacts in constitutively activated mutant (CAM) receptors. For this purpose, the same Met mutagenesis strategy was carried out on the N111G double mutants. Analysis of 43 receptors mutants in the N111G-hAT1 series, photolabeled and CNBr digested, showed that there were only subtle structural changes between the wt-receptor and its constitutively active form.     

The Fifth Transmembrane Domain of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Participates in the Formation of the Ligand-binding Pocket and Undergoes a Counterclockwise Rotation upon Receptor Activation

The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II exerts a wide variety of cardiovascular effects through the activation of the angiotensin II Type 1 (AT₁) receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Like other G protein- coupled receptors, the AT₁ receptor possesses seven transmembrane domains that provide structural support for the formation of the ligand-binding pocket. The role of the fifth transmembrane domain (TMD5) was investigated using the substituted cysteine accessibility method. All of the residues within Thr-190 to Leu-217 region were mutated one at a time to cysteine, and after expression in COS-7 cells, the mutant receptors were treated with the sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA). MTSEA reacts selectively with water-accessible, free sulfhydryl groups of endogenous or introduced point mutation cysteines. If a cysteine is found in the binding pocket, the covalent modification will affect the binding kinetics of the ligand. MTSEA substantially decreased the binding affinity of L197C-AT₁, N200C-AT₁, I201C-AT₁, G203C-AT₁, and F204C-AT₁ mutant receptors, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT₁ receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD5 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active N111G-AT₁ receptor background. Indeed, mutant I201C-N111G-AT₁ became more sensitive to MTSEA, whereas mutant G203C-N111G-AT₁ lost some sensitivity. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of AT₁ receptor causes an apparent counterclockwise rotation of TMD5 as viewed from the extracellular side.     

Analysis of Transmembrane Domains 1 and 4 of the Human Angiotensin II AT1 Receptor by Cysteine-scanning Mutagenesis

The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII) exerts a wide variety of cardiovascular effects through the activation of the AT₁ receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Like other G protein-coupled receptors, the AT₁ receptor possesses seven transmembrane domains that provide structural support for the formation of the ligand-binding pocket. Here, we investigated the role of the first and fourth transmembrane domains (TMDs) in the formation of the binding pocket of the human AT₁ receptor using the substituted-cysteine accessibility method. Each residue within the Phe-28^(1.32)–Ile-53^(1.57) fragment of TMD1 and Leu-143^(4.40)–Phe-170^(4.67) fragment of TMD4 was mutated, one at a time, to a cysteine. The resulting mutant receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells, which were subsequently treated with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium (MTSEA). This treatment led to a significant reduction in the binding affinity of TMD1 mutants M30C^(1.34)-AT₁ and T33C^(1.37)-AT₁ and TMD4 mutant V169C^(4.66)-AT₁. Although this reduction in binding of the TMD1 mutants was maintained when examined in a constitutively active receptor (N111G-AT₁) background, we found that V169C^(4.66)-AT₁ remained unaffected when treated with MTSEA compared with untreated in this context. Moreover, the complete loss of binding observed for R167C^(4.64)-AT₁ was restored upon treatment with MTSEA. Our results suggest that the extracellular portion of TMD1, particularly residues Met-30^(1.34) and Thr-33^(1.37), as well as residues Arg-167^(4.64) and Val-169^(4.66) at the junction of TMD4 and the second extracellular loop, are important binding determinants within the AT₁ receptor binding pocket but that these TMDs undergo very little movement, if at all, during the activation process.     

Identification of Distinct Conformations of the Angiotensin-II Type 1 Receptor Associated with the Gq/11 Protein Pathway and the β-Arrestin Pathway Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Biased signaling represents the ability of G protein-coupled receptors to engage distinct pathways with various efficacies depending on the ligand used or on mutations in the receptor. The angiotensin-II type 1 (AT₁) receptor, a prototypical class A G protein-coupled receptor, can activate various effectors upon stimulation with the endogenous ligand angiotensin-II (AngII), including the G_q/11 protein and β-arrestins. It is believed that the activation of those two pathways can be associated with distinct conformations of the AT₁ receptor. To verify this hypothesis, microseconds of molecular dynamics simulations were computed to explore the conformational landscape sampled by the WT-AT₁ receptor, the N111G-AT₁ receptor (constitutively active and biased for the G_q/11 pathway), and the D74N-AT₁ receptor (biased for the β-arrestin1 and -2 pathways) in their apo-forms and in complex with AngII. The molecular dynamics simulations of the AngII-WT-AT₁, N111G-AT₁, and AngII-N111G-AT₁ receptors revealed specific structural rearrangements compared with the initial and ground state of the receptor. Simulations of the D74N-AT₁ receptor revealed that the mutation stabilizes the receptor in the initial ground state. The presence of AngII further stabilized the ground state of the D74N-AT₁ receptor. The biased agonist [Sar¹,Ile⁸]AngII also showed a preference for the ground state of the WT-AT₁ receptor compared with AngII. These results suggest that activation of the G_q/11 pathway is associated with a specific conformational transition stabilized by the agonist, whereas the activation of the β-arrestin pathway is linked to the stabilization of the ground state of the receptor.     

Manifold active-state conformations in GPCRs: agonist-activated constitutively active mutant AT1 receptor preferentially couples to Gq compared to the wild-type AT1 receptor

The angiotensin II type I (AT(1)) receptor mediates regulation of blood pressure and water-electrolyte balance by Ang II. Substitution of Gly for Asn(111) of the AT(1) receptor constitutively activates the receptor leading to Gq-coupled IP(3) production independent of Ang II binding. The Ang II-activated conformation of the AT1(N111G) receptor was proposed to be similar to that of the wild-type AT(1) receptor, although, various aspects of the Ang II-induced conformation of this constitutively active mutant receptor have not been systematically studied. Here, we provide evidence that the conformation of the active state of the wild-type and the constitutively active AT(1) receptors are different. Upon Ang II binding an activated conformation of the wild-type AT(1) receptor activates G protein and recruits beta-arrestin. In contrast, the agonist-bound AT1(N111G) mutant receptor preferentially couples to Gq and is inadequate in beta-arrestin recruitment.     

A Constitutively Internalizing and Recycling Mutant of the μ-Opioid Receptor

Abstract: Internalization and recycling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as the μ-opioid receptor, largely depend on agonist stimulation, whereas certain other receptor types recycle constitutively, e.g., the transferrin receptor. To investigate structural domains involved in μ-opioid receptor internalization, we constructed two truncation mutants bracketing a Ser/Thr-rich domain (³⁵⁴ThrSerSerThrIleGluGlnGlnAsn³⁶²) unique to the C-terminus of the μ-opioid receptor (mutants Trunc354 and Trunc363). Ligand binding did not differ substantially, and G protein coupling was slightly lower for these μ-receptor constructs, in particular for Trunc363. To permit localization of the receptor by immunocytochemistry, an epitope tag was added to the N-terminus of the wildtype and mutant receptors. Both the wild-type μ-opioid receptor and Trunc363 resided largely at the plasma membrane and internalized into vesicles upon stimulation with the agonist [d -Ala²,N-Me-Phe⁴,Gly-ol⁵]-enkephalin. Internalization occurred into vesicles that contain transferrin receptors, as shown previously, as well as clathrin, but not caveolin. In contrast, even without any agonist present, Trunc354 colocalized in intracellular vesicles with clathrin and transferrin receptors, but not caveolin. On blocking internalization by hyperosmolar sucrose or acid treatment, Trunc354 translocated to the plasma membrane, indicating that the mutant internalized into clathrin-coated vesicles and recycled constitutively. Despite agonist-independent internalization of Trunc354, basal G protein coupling was not elevated, suggesting distinct mechanisms for coupling and internalization. Furthermore, a portion of the C-terminus, particularly the Ser/Thr domain, appears to suppress μ-receptor internalization, which can be overcome by agonist stimulation. These results demonstrate that a mutant GPCR can be constructed such that internalization, normally an agonist-dependent process, can occur spontaneously without concomitant G protein activation.     

Constitutive activation of the opioid receptor-like (ORL1) receptor by mutation of Asn133 to tryptophan in the third transmembrane region

We have introduced a series of point mutations into the human opioid receptor-like (ORL1) receptor and characterized them for their ability to constitutively activate G protein-coupled receptor signalling pathways. Among the 12 mutants generated, mutation at Asn133 (N133W) gave increased basal signalling through three separate pathways. N133W increased the basal activity of G14- and G16-dependent pathways by two- to three-fold. The constitutive activity of the mutant was confirmed by the finding that the enhanced activity is dependent on the level of receptor expression. In HEK-293 cells stably expressing N133W, signalling through Gi/o-dependent pathways was also observed. Radioligand binding studies revealed that the affinity for nociceptin of the wild-type ORL1 receptor and the N133W mutant do not differ significantly, suggesting that the ligand binding and signalling functions of constitutively active mutants of G protein-coupled receptors are not necessarily intrinsically linked. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that a mutation in the third transmembrane domain is able to increase the basal signalling activity of the human ORL1 receptor.     

The Second Transmembrane Domain of the Human Type 1 Angiotensin II Receptor Participates in the Formation of the Ligand Binding Pocket and Undergoes Integral Pivoting Movement during the Process of Receptor Activation

The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII) exerts a wide variety of cardiovascular effects through the activation of the angiotensin II type-1 (AT₁) receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Like other G protein-coupled receptors, the AT₁ receptor possesses seven transmembrane domains that provide structural support for the formation of the ligand-binding pocket. In order to identify those residues in the second transmembrane domain (TMD2) that contribute to the formation of the binding pocket of the AT₁ receptor, we used the substituted cysteine accessibility method. All of the residues within the Leu-70 to Trp-94 region were mutated one at a time to a cysteine, and, after expression in COS-7 cells, the mutant receptors were treated with the sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA). MTSEA reacts selectively with water-accessible, free sulfhydryl groups of endogenous or introduced point mutation cysteines. If a cysteine is found in the binding pocket, the covalent modification will affect the binding kinetics of the ligand. MTSEA substantially decreased the binding affinity of D74C-AT₁, L81C-AT₁, A85C-AT₁, T88C-AT₁, and A89C-AT₁ mutant receptors, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT₁ receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD2 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active N111G-AT₁ receptor background. Indeed, mutant D74C-N111G-AT₁ became insensitive to MTSEA, whereas mutant L81C-N111G-AT₁ lost some sensitivity and mutant V86C-N111G-AT₁ became sensitive to MTSEA. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of the AT₁ receptor causes TMD2 to pivot, bringing the top of TMD2 closer to the binding pocket and pushing the bottom of TMD2 away from the binding pocket.The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII)⁵ is the active component of the renin-angiotensin system. It exerts a wide variety of physiological effects, including vascular contraction, aldosterone secretion, neuronal activation, and cardiovascular cell growth and proliferation (1). Virtually all of the known physiological effects of AngII are produced through the activation of the AT₁ receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily (2, 3). GPCRs possess seven transmembrane domains (TMD), which provide structural support for signal transduction. The AT₁ receptor interacts with the G protein G_q/11, which activates a phospholipase C, which in turn generates inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol from the cleavage of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (4, 5). Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate causes the release of Ca²⁺ from an intracellular store, whereas diacylglycerol activates protein kinase C.Like other GPCRs, the AT₁ receptor undergoes spontaneous isomerization between its inactive state (favored in the absence of agonist) and its active state (induced or stabilized by the agonist) (6). Movement of TMD helices through translational or rotational displacement is believed to be essential to achieve the active state (7, 8). It has been proposed that TMD3, TMD5, TMD6, and TMD7 may participate in the activation process of the AT₁ receptor by providing a network of interactions through the AngII-binding pocket (9). The dynamics of this network are thought to be modified following agonist binding, thereby forcing the receptor to form new interactions between the TMDs.Based on homology with the high resolution structure of rhodopsin, the archetypal GPCR (10), it was expected that the binding site of the AT₁ receptor would involve the seven mostly hydrophobic TMDs and would be accessible to charged water-soluble ligands, like AngII. For this receptor, the binding site would thus be contained within a water-accessible crevice, the binding pocket, extending from the extracellular surface of the receptor to the transmembrane portion. Using a photoaffinity labeling approach, we directly identified ligand-contact points within the second extracellular loop and the seventh TMD of the AT₁ receptor (11–13). Interestingly, numerous mutagenesis studies have provided the basis for a model in which an interaction between Asn-111 in TMD3 and Tyr-292 in TMD7 maintains the AT₁ receptor in the inactive conformation. The agonist AngII would disrupt this interaction and promote the active conformational state (14). In support of this model, it was further shown that substitution of Asn-111 for a residue of smaller size (Ala or Gly) confers constitutive activity on the AT₁ receptor (15–17).The substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) (18–20) is an ingenious approach for systematically identifying the residues in a TMD that contribute to the binding site pocket of a GPCR. Consecutive residues within TMDs are mutated to cysteine, one at a time, and the mutant receptors are expressed in heterologous cells. If ligand binding to a cysteine-substituted mutant is unchanged compared with wild-type receptor, it is assumed that the structure of the mutant receptor, especially around the binding site, is similar to that of wild type and therefore that the substituted cysteine lies in an orientation similar to that of the wild-type residue. In TMDs, the sulfhydryl of a cysteine oriented toward the binding site pocket should react faster with a positively charged sulfhydryl reagent like methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA) than sulfhydryls facing the interior of the protein or the lipid bilayer. Two criteria are used for identifying engineered cysteines on the surface of the binding site pocket: (i) the reaction with MTSEA alters binding irreversibly, and (ii) the reaction is retarded by the presence of ligand. We previously used this approach to identify the residues in TMD3, TMD6, and TMD7 that form the surface of the binding site pocket in the wild-type AT₁ receptor and in the constitutively active N111G-AT₁ receptor (21–23). Here we report the application of SCAM to probe TMD2 in the wild-type and constitutively active receptors.     

Ligand Binding and Modulation of Cyclic AMP Levels Depend on the Chemical Nature of Residue 192 of the Human Cannabinoid Receptor 1

Abstract: The human cannabinoid receptor associated with the CNS (CB1) binds Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive component of marijuana, and other cannabimimetic compounds. This receptor is a member of the seven transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptor family and mediates its effects through inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. An understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in ligand binding and receptor activation requires identification of the active site residues and their role. Lys¹⁹² of the third transmembrane domain of the receptor is noteworthy because it is the only nonconserved, charged residue in the transmembrane region. To investigate the properties of this residue, which are important for both ligand binding and receptor activation, we generated mutant receptors in which this amino acid was changed to either Arg (K192R), Gln (K192Q), or Glu (K192E). Wild-type and mutant receptors were stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and were evaluated in binding assays with the bicyclic cannabinoid CP-55,940 and the aminoalkylindole WIN 55,212-2. We found that only the most conservative change of Lys to Arg allowed retention of binding affinity to CP-55,940, whereas WIN 55,212-2 bound to all of the mutant receptors in the same range as it bound the wild type. Analysis of the ligand-induced inhibition of cyclic AMP production in cells expressing each of the receptors gave an EC₅₀ value for each agonist that was comparable to its binding affinity, with one exception. Although the mutant K192E receptor displayed similar binding affinity as the wild type with WIN 55,212-2, an order of magnitude difference was observed for the EC₅₀ for cyclic AMP inhibition with this compound. The results of this study indicate that binding of CP-55,940 is highly sensitive to the chemical nature of residue 192. In contrast, although this residue is not critical for WIN 55,212-2 binding, the data suggest a role for Lys¹⁹² in WIN 55,212-2-induced receptor activation.     

Full and Partial Agonists of Thromboxane Prostanoid Receptor Unveil Fine Tuning of Receptor Superactive Conformation and G Protein Activation

The intrahelical salt bridge between E/D^3.49 and R^3.50 within the E/DRY motif on helix 3 (H3) and the interhelical hydrogen bonding between the E/DRY and residues on H6 are thought to be critical in stabilizing the class A G protein-coupled receptors in their inactive state. Removal of these interactions is expected to generate constitutively active receptors. This study examines how neutralization of E^3.49/6.30 in the thromboxane prostanoid (TP) receptor alters ligand binding, basal, and agonist-induced activity and investigates the molecular mechanisms of G protein activation. We demonstrate here that a panel of full and partial agonists showed an increase in affinity and potency for E129V and E240V mutants. Yet, even augmenting the sensitivity to detect constitutive activity (CA) with overexpression of the receptor or the G protein revealed resistance to an increase in basal activity, while retaining fully the ability to cause agonist-induced signaling. However, direct G protein activation measured through bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) indicates that these mutants more efficiently communicate and/or activate their cognate G proteins. These results suggest the existence of additional constrains governing the shift of TP receptor to its active state, together with an increase propensity of these mutants to agonist-induced signaling, corroborating their definition as superactive mutants. The particular nature of the TP receptor as somehow “resistant” to CA should be examined in the context of its pathophysiological role in the cardiovascular system. Evolutionary forces may have favored regulation mechanisms leading to low basal activity and selected against more highly active phenotypes.     

A constitutively active GPCR governs morphogenic transitions in Cryptococcus neoformans

Sex in fungi is driven by peptide pheromones sensed through seven‐transmembrane pheromone receptors. In Cryptococcus neoformans, sexual reproduction occurs through an outcrossing/heterothallic a ‐ sexual cycle or an inbreeding/homothallic – unisexual mating process. Pheromone receptors encoded by the mating‐type locus ( MAT ) mediate reciprocal pheromone sensing during opposite‐sex mating and contribute to but are not essential for unisexual mating. A pheromone receptor‐like gene, CPR2 , was discovered that is not encoded by MAT and whose expression is induced during a ‐ mating. cpr2 mutants are fertile but have a fusion defect and produce abnormal hyphal structures, whereas CPR2 overexpression elicits unisexual reproduction. When heterologously expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Cpr2 activates pheromone responses in the absence of any ligand. This constitutive activity results from an unconventional residue, Leu²²², in place of a conserved proline in transmembrane domain six; a Cpr2^L222P mutant is no longer constitutively active. Cpr2 engages the same G‐protein activated signalling cascade as the Ste3 a /α pheromone receptors, and thereby competes for pathway activation. This study established a new paradigm in which a naturally occurring constitutively active G protein‐coupled receptor governs morphogenesis in fungi.     

D5 Dopamine Receptor Knockout Mice and Hypertension

Abnormalities in dopamine production and receptor function have been described in human essential hypertension and rodent models of genetic hypertension. All of the five dopamine receptor genes (D₁, D₂, D₃, D₄, and D₅) expressed in mammals and some of their regulators are in loci linked to hypertension in humans and in rodents. Under normal conditions, D₁-like receptors (D₁ and D₅) inhibit sodium transport in the kidney and the intestine. However, in the Dahl salt-sensitive and spontaneously hypertensive rats, and humans with essential hypertension, the D₁-like receptor-mediated inhibition of sodium transport is impaired because of an uncoupling of the D₁-like receptor from its G protein/effector complex. The uncoupling is genetic, and receptor-, organ-, and nephron segment-specific. In human essential hypertension, the uncoupling of the D₁ receptor from its G protein/effector complex is caused by an agonist-independent serine phosphorylation/desensitization by constitutively active variants of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase type 4. The D₅ receptor is also important in blood pressure regulation. Disruption of the D₅ or the D₁ receptor gene in mice increases blood pressure. However, unlike the D₁ receptor, the hypertension in D₅ receptor null mice is caused by increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system, apparently due to activation of oxytocin, V₁ vasopressin, and non-N-methyl D-aspartate receptors in the central nervous system. The cause of the activation of these receptors remains to be determined.     

Thermostabilization of the Neurotensin Receptor NTS1

Structural studies on G-protein-coupled receptors have been hampered for many years by their instability in detergent solution and by the number of potential conformations that receptors can adopt. Recently, the structures of the β₁ and β₂ adrenergic receptors and the adenosine A_2a receptor were determined in the antagonist-bound state, a receptor conformation that is thought to be more stable than the agonist-bound state. In contrast to these receptors, the neurotensin (NT) receptor NTS1 is much less stable in detergent solution. We have therefore used a systematic mutational approach coupled with activity assays to identify receptor mutants suitable for crystallization, both alone and in complex with the peptide agonist NT. The best receptor mutant NTS1-7m contained four point mutations. It showed increased stability compared to the wild-type receptor, in the absence of ligand, after solubilization with a variety of detergents. In addition, NTS1-7m bound to NT was more stable than unliganded NTS1-7m. Of the four thermostabilizing mutations, only one residue (A86L) is predicted to be in the lipid environment. In contrast, I260A appears to be buried within the transmembrane helix bundle, F342A may form a distant part of the putative ligand-binding site, whereas F358A is likely to be in a region that is important for receptor activation. NTS1-7m binds NT with a similar affinity for the wild-type receptor. However, agonist dissociation was slower, and NTS1-7m activated G-proteins poorly. The affinity of NTS1-7m for the antagonist SR48692 was also lower than that of the wild-type receptor. Thus, we have successfully stabilized NTS1 in an agonist-binding conformation that does not efficiently couple to G-proteins.     

Long Range Effect of Mutations on Specific Conformational Changes in the Extracellular Loop 2 of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor

The topology of the second extracellular loop (ECL2) and its interaction with ligands is unique in each G protein-coupled receptor. When the orthosteric ligand pocket located in the transmembrane (TM) domain is occupied, ligand-specific conformational changes occur in the ECL2. In more than 90% of G protein-coupled receptors, ECL2 is tethered to the third TM helix via a disulfide bond. Therefore, understanding the extent to which the TM domain and ECL2 conformations are coupled is useful. To investigate this, we examined conformational changes in ECL2 of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) by introducing mutations in distant sites that alter the activation state equilibrium of the AT1R. Differential accessibility of reporter cysteines introduced at four conformation-sensitive sites in ECL2 of these mutants was measured. Binding of the agonist angiotensin II (AngII) and inverse agonist losartan in wild-type AT1R changed the accessibility of reporter cysteines, and the pattern was consistent with ligand-specific “lid” conformations of ECL2. Without agonist stimulation, the ECL2 in the gain of function mutant N111G assumed a lid conformation similar to AngII-bound wild-type AT1R. In the presence of inverse agonists, the conformation of ECL2 in the N111G mutant was similar to the inactive state of wild-type AT1R. In contrast, AngII did not induce a lid conformation in ECL2 in the loss of function D281A mutant, which is consistent with the reduced AngII binding affinity in this mutant. However, a lid conformation was induced by [Sar¹,Gln²,Ile⁸] AngII, a specific analog that binds to the D281A mutant with better affinity than AngII. These results provide evidence for the emerging paradigm of domain coupling facilitated by long range interactions at distant sites on the same receptor.     

The constitutively active N111G-AT1 receptor for angiotensin II modifies the morphology and cytoskeletal organization of HEK-293 cells

The expression of a constitutively active G protein-coupled receptor is expected to trigger diverse cellular changes ranging from normal to adaptive responses. We report that confluent HEK-293 cells stably expressing the constitutively active mutant N111G-AT1 receptor for angiotensin II spontaneously exhibited dramatic morphological changes and cytoskeletal reorganization. Phase-contrast microscopy revealed that these cells formed a dense monolayer, whereas cells expressing the WT-AT1 receptor displayed large intercellular spaces and numerous filopodia. Confocal microscopy revealed an elaborate web of polymerized actin at the apical and basolateral surfaces of cells expressing the N111G-AT1 receptor. Interestingly, these phenotypic changes were prevented by culturing the cells in the presence of the inverse agonist EXP3174. Similar morphologic rearrangements and de novo polymerized actin structures were found in Ang II-stimulated cells expressing the WT-AT1 receptor. We further showed that AT1 receptor-induced cell-cell contact formation did not require an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration or the activity of protein kinase C. However, pretreatment with Y-27632 revealed that Rho-kinase activity was required for cell-cell contact formation upon AT1 receptor activation. These observations demonstrate that the expression of the constitutively active mutant N111G-AT1 receptor had a significant impact on the morphology and cytoskeletal organization of HEK-293 cells, possibly via a mechanism involving the activity of Rho-kinase.     

Activation of Type II Adenylyl Cyclase by the Cloned μ-Opioid Receptor: Coupling to Multiple G Proteins

Abstract: Opioid receptors are multifunctional receptors that utilize G proteins for signal transduction. The cloned δ-opioid receptor has been shown recently to stimulate phospholipase C, as well as to inhibit or stimulate different isoforms of adenylyl cyclase. By using transient transfection studies, the ability of the cloned μ-opioid receptor to stimulate type II adenylyl cyclase was examined. Coexpression of the μ-opioid receptor with type II adenylyl cyclase in human embryonic kidney 293 cells allowed the μ-selective agonist, [d -Ala², N-Me-Phe⁴,Gly⁵-ol]enkephalin, to stimulate cyclic AMP accumulation in a dose-dependent manner. The opioid-induced stimulation of type II adenylyl cyclase was mediated via pertussis toxin-sensitive G_i proteins, because it was abolished completely by the toxin. Possible coupling between the μ-opioid receptor and various G protein α subunits was examined in the type II adenylyl cyclase system. The opioid-induced response became pertussis toxin-insensitive and was enhanced significantly upon co-expression with the α subunit of G_z, whereas those of G_q, G₁₂, or G₁₃ inhibited the opioid response. When pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein α subunits were tested under similar conditions, all three forms of α_i and both forms of α_o were able to enhance the opioid response to various extents. Enhancement of type II adenylyl cyclase responses by the co-expression of α subunits reflects a functional coupling between α subunits and the μ-opioid receptor, because such potentiations were not observed with the constitutively activated α subunit mutants. These results indicate that the μ-opioid receptor can couple to G_i1–3, G_o1–2, and G_z, but not to G_s, G_q, G₁₂, G₁₃, or G_t.     

Constitutive activation and endocytosis of the complement factor 5a receptor: evidence for multiple activated conformations of a G protein-coupled receptor

Serpentine receptors relay hormonal or sensory stimuli to heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins). In most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), binding of the agonist ligand elicits both stimulation of the G protein and endocytosis of the receptor. We have begun to address whether these responses reflect the same sets of conformational changes in the receptor using constitutively active mutants of the human complement factor 5a receptor (C5aR). Two different mutant receptors both constitutively activate G protein-mediated responses, but one (F251A) is endocytosed only in response to ligand stimulation, while the other (NQ) is constitutively internalized in the absence of ligand. Both the constitutive and ligand-dependent endocytosis are accompanied by recruitment of beta-arrestin to the receptor. An inactivating mutation (N296A) complements the NQ mutation, producing a receptor that is activated only upon exposure to agonist; this revertant receptor (NQ/N296A) is nevertheless constitutively endocytosed. Thus one mutant (F251A) requires agonist for triggering endocytosis but not for activation of the downstream G protein signal, while another (NQ/N296A) behaves in the opposite fashion. Dissociation of two responses normally dependent on agonist binding indicates that the corresponding functions of an activated GPCR reflect different sets of changes in the receptor's conformation .     

Functional Importance of the Carboxyl Tail Cysteine Residues in the Human D1 Dopamine Receptor

Abstract: To assess the importance of the cysteine residues Cys³⁴⁷ and Cys³⁵¹ in the carboxylic tail in the human D₁ dopamine receptor, seven mutant receptors were constructed by PCR. The pharmacological and functional properties of the wild-type and mutant receptors were assessed following transient expression in COS-7 cells. Affinities for [³H]SCH 23390 of mutant S347 (Cys³⁴⁷→ Gly), T348 (Tyr³⁴⁸→ stop), S351 (Cys³⁵¹→ Gly), T351 (Cys³⁵¹→ stop), T352 (Pro³⁵²→ stop), and S347/S351 (Cys³⁴⁷→ Gly and Cys³⁵¹→ Gly) were similar to that of wild-type receptor, whereas the expression levels were reduced up to 80%. The potency of dopaminergic antagonists for these mutant receptors was very similar to that of the wild-type receptor. However, mutant T347 (Cys³⁴⁷→ stop) showed a 15–25-fold reduced affinity for the antagonists SCH 23390, (+)-butaclamol, and cis-flupentixol, thus not allowing radioligand analysis. Wild-type and mutant receptors responded dose-dependently with similar potency to dopamine and SKF 38393 with an increased adenylyl cyclase activity. However, mutant receptors with the Cys³⁴⁷ residue changed or removed displayed a diminished ability to activate adenylyl cyclase. Dopamine preexposure desensitized wild-type and mutant S351 receptors. However, mutant receptors with Cys³⁴⁷ replaced or the distal part of the carboxyl tail removed were unable to desensitize. Thus, Cys³⁴⁷ in the cytoplasmic tail of the human D₁ dopamine receptor is important for the receptor in maintaining the conformation for antagonist binding, to play a crucial role in activation of adenylyl cyclase, and to be essential for agonist-induced desensitization.     

Intracellular Transactivation of the Insulin-like Growth Factor I Receptor by an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor

Growth factor receptors may be transactivated not only by homologous receptors, but also by heterologous receptors. We have investigated this possibility, using for this purpose R⁻/EGFR cells, which are mouse embryo cells devoid of IGF-I receptors, but overexpressing the EGF receptor. At variance with mouse embryo cells with a wild-type number of IGF-I receptors and overexpressing the EGF receptor, R⁻/EGFR cells cannot grow in EGF only, nor can they form colonies in soft agar. However, if a wild type human IGF-I receptor is stably transfected into R⁻/EGFR cells, growth in EGF and colony formation in soft agar are restored. To determine a possible interaction between the two receptors, we transfected into R⁻/EGFR cells a number of IGF-I receptor mutants with different impaired functions. The only IGF-I receptor that cannot reverse the growth phenotype of R⁻/EGFR cells is a receptor with a point mutation at the ATP-binding site. All other mutant receptors, even when incapable of responding to IGF-I with a mitogenic signal, made R⁻/EGFR cells fully capable of responding with growth to EGF stimulation. IGF-I receptor mutants that are mitogenic but not transforming made R⁻/EGFR cells grow in EGF only, but were incapable of inducing the transformed phenotype. The mutant IGF-I receptors are activated (tyrosyl phosphorylation of IRS-1) in response to EGF. These experiments indicate that certain IGF-I receptor mutants with loss of function can be reactivated intracellularly by an overexpressed EGF receptor and confirm that the C-terminus of the IGF-IR is required for its transforming activity.