Improved Approximations for Tour and Tree Covers

A tree (tour) cover of an edge-weighted graph is a set of edges which forms a tree (closed walk) and covers every other edge in the graph. Arkin et al. give approximation algorithms with ratios 3.55 (tree cover) and 5.5 (tour cover). We present algorithms with a worst-case ratio of 3 for both problems.     

A 2-approximation NC algorithm for connected vertex cover and tree cover

The connected vertex cover problem is a variant of the vertex cover problem, in which a vertex cover is additional required to induce a connected subgraph in a given connected graph. The problem is known to be NP-hard and to be at least as hard to approximate as the vertex cover problem is. While several 2-approximation NC algorithms are known for vertex cover, whether unweighted or weighted, no parallel algorithm with guaranteed approximation is known for connected vertex cover. Moreover, converting the existing sequential 2-approximation algorithms for connected vertex cover to parallel ones results in RNC algorithms of rather high complexity at best.In this paper we present a 2-approximation NC (and RNC) algorithm for connected vertex cover (and tree cover). The NC algorithm runs in O(log²n) time using O(Δ²(m+n)/logn) processors on an EREW-PRAM, while the RNC algorithm runs in O(logn) expected time using O(m+n) processors on a CRCW-PRAM, when a given graph has n vertices and m edges with maximum vertex degree of Δ.     

Models of Greedy Algorithms for Graph Problems

Borodin et al. (Algorithmica 37(4):295–326, 2003) gave a model of greedy-like algorithms for scheduling problems and Angelopoulos and Borodin (Algorithmica 40(4):271–291, 2004) extended their work to facility location and set cover problems. We generalize their model to include other optimization problems, and apply the generalized framework to graph problems. Our goal is to define an abstract model that captures the intrinsic power and limitations of greedy algorithms for various graph optimization problems, as Borodin et al. (Algorithmica 37(4):295–326, 2003) did for scheduling. We prove bounds on the approximation ratio achievable by such algorithms for basic graph problems such as shortest path, weighted vertex cover, Steiner tree, and independent set. For example, we show that, for the shortest path problem, no algorithm in the FIXED priority model can achieve any approximation ratio (even one dependent on the graph size), but the well-known Dijkstra’s algorithm is an optimal ADAPTIVE priority algorithm. We also prove that the approximation ratio for weighted vertex cover achievable by ADAPTIVE priority algorithms is exactly 2. Here, a new lower bound matches the known upper bounds (Johnson in J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 9(3):256–278, 1974). We give a number of other lower bounds for priority algorithms, as well as a new approximation algorithm for minimum Steiner tree problem with weights in the interval [1,2]. S. Davis’ research supported by NSF grants CCR-0098197, CCR-0313241, and CCR-0515332. Views expressed are not endorsed by the NSF. R. Impagliazzo’s research supported by NSF grant CCR-0098197, CCR-0313241, and CCR-0515332. Views expressed are not endorsed by the NSF. Some work done while at the Institute for Advanced Study, supported by the State of New Jersey.     

Algorithmic Graph Minor Theory: Improved Grid Minor Bounds and Wagner’s Contraction

We explore three important avenues of research in algorithmic graph-minor theory, which all stem from a key min-max relation between the treewidth of a graph and its largest grid minor. This min-max relation is a keystone of the Graph Minor Theory of Robertson and Seymour, which ultimately proves Wagner’s Conjecture about the structure of minor-closed graph properties. First, we obtain the only known polynomial min-max relation for graphs that do not exclude any fixed minor, namely, map graphs and power graphs. Second, we obtain explicit (and improved) bounds on the min-max relation for an important class of graphs excluding a minor, namely, K _3,k -minor-free graphs, using new techniques that do not rely on Graph Minor Theory. These two avenues lead to faster fixed-parameter algorithms for two families of graph problems, called minor-bidimensional and contraction-bidimensional parameters, which include feedback vertex set, vertex cover, minimum maximal matching, face cover, a series of vertex-removal parameters, dominating set, edge dominating set, R-dominating set, connected dominating set, connected edge dominating set, connected R-dominating set, and unweighted TSP tour. Third, we disprove a variation of Wagner’s Conjecture for the case of graph contractions in general graphs, and in a sense characterize which graphs satisfy the variation. This result demonstrates the limitations of a general theory of algorithms for the family of contraction-closed problems (which includes, for example, the celebrated dominating-set problem). If this conjecture had been true, we would have had an extremely powerful tool for proving the existence of efficient algorithms for any contraction-closed problem, like we do for minor-closed problems via Graph Minor Theory.     

Distributed Graph Traversals by Relabelling Systems with Applications

Graph traversals are in the basis of many distributed algorithms. In this paper, we use graph relabelling systems to encode two basic graph traversals which are the broadcast and the convergecast. This encoding allows us to derive formal, modular and simple encoding for many distributed graph algorithms. We illustrate this method by investigating the distributed computation of a breadth-first spanning tree and the distributed computation of a minimum spanning tree. Our formalism allows to focus on the correctness of a distributed algorithm rather than on the implementation and the communication details.     

Efficient Parallel Graph Algorithms for Coarse-Grained Multicomputers and BSP

In this paper we present deterministic parallel algorithms for the coarse-grained multicomputer (CGM) and bulk synchronous parallel (BSP) models for solving the following well-known graph problems: (1) list ranking, (2) Euler tour construction in a tree, (3) computing the connected components and spanning forest, (4) lowest common ancestor preprocessing, (5) tree contraction and expression tree evaluation, (6) computing an ear decomposition or open ear decomposition, and (7) 2-edge connectivity and biconnectivity (testing and component computation). The algorithms require O(log p) communication rounds with linear sequential work per round (p = no. processors, N = total input size). Each processor creates, during the entire algorithm, messages of total size O(log (p) (N/p)) . The algorithms assume that the local memory per processor (i.e., N/p ) is larger than p ^ε , for some fixed ε > 0 . Our results imply BSP algorithms with O(log p) supersteps, O(g log (p) (N/p)) communication time, and O(log (p) (N/p)) local computation time. It is important to observe that the number of communication rounds/ supersteps obtained in this paper is independent of the problem size, and grows only logarithmically with respect to p . With growing problem size, only the sizes of the messages grow but the total number of messages remains unchanged. Due to the considerable protocol overhead associated with each message transmission, this is an important property. The result for Problem (1) is a considerable improvement over those previously reported. The algorithms for Problems (2)—(7) are the first practically relevant parallel algorithms for these standard graph problems. Received July 5, 2000; revised April 16, 2001.     

Automated Generation of Search Tree Algorithms for Hard Graph Modification Problems

We present a framework for an automated generation of exact search tree algorithms for NP-hard problems. The purpose of our approach is twofold—rapid development and improved upper bounds. Many search tree algorithms for various problems in the literature are based on complicated case distinctions. Our approach may lead to a much simpler process of developing and analyzing these algorithms. Moreover, using the sheer computing power of machines it may also lead to improved upper bounds on search tree sizes (i.e., faster exact solving algorithms) in comparison with previously developed hand-made search trees. Among others, such an example is given with the NP-complete Cluster Editing problem (also known as Correlation Clustering on complete unweighted graphs), which asks for the minimum number of edge additions and deletions to create a graph which is a disjoint union of cliques. The hand-made search tree for Cluster Editing had worst-case size O(2.27^k), which now is improved to O(1.92^k) due to our new method. (Herein, k denotes the number of edge modifications allowed.)     

Exponential Speedup of Fixed-Parameter Algorithms for Classes of Graphs Excluding Single-Crossing Graphs as Minors

We present a fixed-parameter algorithm that constructively solves the $k$-dominating set problem on any class of graphs excluding a single-crossing graph (a graph that can be drawn in the plane with at most one crossing) as a minor in $O(4^{9.55\sqrt{k}}n^{O(1)})$ time. Examples of such graph classes are the $K_{3,3}$-minor-free graphs and the $K_{5}$-minor-free graphs. As a consequence, we extend our results to several other problems such as vertex cover, edge dominating set, independent set, clique-transversal set, kernels in digraphs, feedback vertex set, and a collection of vertex-removal problems. Our work generalizes and extends the recent results of exponential speedup in designing fixed-parameter algorithms on planar graphs due to Alber et al. to other (nonplanar) classes of graphs.     

Inexact graph matching for model-based recognition: Evaluation and comparison of optimization algorithms

A method for segmentation and recognition of image structures based on graph homomorphisms is presented in this paper. It is a model-based recognition method where the input image is over-segmented and the obtained regions are represented by an attributed relational graph (ARG). This graph is then matched against a model graph thus accomplishing the model-based recognition task. This type of problem calls for inexact graph matching through a homomorphism between the graphs since no bijective correspondence can be expected, because of the over-segmentation of the image with respect to the model. The search for the best homomorphism is carried out by optimizing an objective function based on similarities between object and relational attributes defined on the graphs. The following optimization procedures are compared and discussed: deterministic tree search, for which new algorithms are detailed, genetic algorithms and estimation of distribution algorithms. In order to assess the performance of these algorithms using real data, experimental results on supervised classification of facial features using face images from public databases are presented.     

Chain packing in graphs

This paper discusses the complexity of packingk-chains (simple paths of lengthk) into an undirected graph; the chains packed must be either vertex-disjoint or edge-disjoint. Linear-time algorithms are given for both problems when the graph is a tree, and for the edge-disjoint packing problem when the graph is general andk = 2. The vertex-disjoint packing problem for general graphs is shown to be NP-complete even when the graph has maximum degree three andk = 2. Similarly the edge-disjoint packing problem is NP-complete even when the graph has maximum degree four andk = 3.This is a revised version of the technical report [15].     

Going weighted: Parameterized algorithms for cluster editing

The goal of the Cluster Editing problem is to make the fewest changes to the edge set of an input graph such that the resulting graph is a disjoint union of cliques. This problem is NP-complete but recently, several parameterized algorithms have been proposed. In this paper, we present a number of surprisingly simple search tree algorithms for Weighted Cluster Editing assuming that edge insertion and deletion costs are positive integers. We show that the smallest search tree has size O(1.82^k) for edit cost k, resulting in the currently fastest parameterized algorithm, both for this problem and its unweighted counterpart. We have implemented and compared our algorithms, and achieved promising results.¹     

Treewidth computations II. Lower bounds

For several applications, it is important to be able to compute the treewidth of a given graph and to find tree decompositions of small width reasonably fast. Good lower bounds on the treewidth of a graph can, amongst others, help to speed up branch and bound algorithms that compute the treewidth of a graph exactly. A high lower bound for a specific graph instance can tell that a dynamic programming approach for solving a problem is infeasible for this instance. This paper gives an overview of several recent methods that give lower bounds on the treewidth of graphs.     

On generalization/specialization for conceptual graphs

Abstract

This paper centres on the generalization/specialization relation in the framework of conceptual graphs (this relation corresponds to logical subsumption when considering logical formulas associated with conceptual graphs). Results given here apply more generally to any model where knowledge is described by labelled graphs and reasoning is based on graph subsumption, as in semantic networks or in structural machine learning. The generalization/specialization relation, as defined by Sowa, is first precisely analysed, in particular its links with a graph morphism, called projection. Besides Sowa's specialization relation (which is a preorder), another one is actually used in some practical applications (which is an order). These are comparatively studied. The second topic of this paper is the design of efficient algorithms for computing these specialization relations. Since the associated problems are NP-hard, the form of the graphs is restricted in order to arrive at polynomial algorithms. In particular, polynomial algorithms are presented for computing a projection from a conceptual ‘tree’ to any conceptual graph, and for counting the number of such projections. The algorithms are also described in a generic way, replacing the projection by a parametrized graph morphism, and conceptual graphs by directed labelled graphs.     

Minimum Connected Dominating Set Using a Collaborative Cover Heuristic for Ad Hoc Sensor Networks

A minimum connected dominating set (MCDS) is used as virtual backbone for efficient routing and broadcasting in ad hoc sensor networks. The minimum CDS problem is NP-complete even in unit disk graphs. Many heuristics-based distributed approximation algorithms for MCDS problems are reported and the best known performance ratio has (4.8+ln 5). We propose a new heuristic called collaborative cover using two principles: 1) domatic number of a connected graph is at least two and 2) optimal substructure defined as subset of independent dominator preferably with a common connector. We obtain a partial Steiner tree during the construction of the independent set (dominators). A final postprocessing step identifies the Steiner nodes in the formation of Steiner tree for the independent set of G. We show that our collaborative cover heuristics are better than degree-based heuristics in identifying independent set and Steiner tree. While our distributed approximation CDS algorithm achieves the performance ratio of (4.8+ln 5){rm opt} + 1.2, where {rm opt} is the size of any optimal CDS, we also show that the collaborative cover heuristic is able to give a marginally better bound when the distribution of sensor nodes is uniform permitting identification of the optimal substructures. We show that the message complexity of our algorithm is O(nDelta^{2} ), Delta being the maximum degree of a node in graph and the time complexity is O(n).     

Property Testing in Bounded Degree Graphs

Abstract. We further develop the study of testing graph properties as initiated by Goldreich, Goldwasser and Ron. Loosely speaking, given an oracle access to a graph, we wish to distinguish the case when the graph has a pre-determined property from the case when it is ``far' from having this property. Whereas they view graphs as represented by their adjacency matrix and measure the distance between graphs as a fraction of all possible vertex pairs, we view graphs as represented by bounded-length incidence lists and measure the distance between graphs as a fraction of the maximum possible number of edges. Thus, while the previous model is most appropriate for the study of dense graphs, our model is most appropriate for the study of bounded-degree graphs. In particular, we present randomized algorithms for testing whether an unknown bounded-degree graph is connected, k -connected (for k>1 ), cycle-free and Eulerian. Our algorithms work in time polynomial in 1/ɛ , always accept the graph when it has the tested property, and reject with high probability if the graph is ɛ -far from having the property. For example, the 2-connectivity algorithm rejects (with high probability) any N -vertex d -degree graph for which more than ɛ dN edges need to be added in order to make the graph 2-edge-connected. In addition we prove lower bounds of Ω(\sqrt N ) on the query complexity of testing algorithms for the bipartite and expander properties.     

The General Steiner Tree-Star problem

The Steiner tree problem is defined as follows—given a graph G=(V,E) and a subset X⊂V of terminals, compute a minimum cost tree that includes all nodes in X. Furthermore, it is reasonable to assume that the edge costs form a metric. This problem is NP-hard and has been the study of many heuristics and algorithms. We study a generalization of this problem, where there is a “switch” cost in addition to the cost of the edges. Switches are placed at internal nodes of the tree (essentially, we may assume that all non-leaf nodes of the Steiner tree have a switch). The cost for placing a switch may vary from node to node. A restricted version of this problem, where the terminal set X cannot be connected to each other directly but only via the Steiner nodes V?X, is referred to as the Steiner Tree-Star problem. The General Steiner Tree-Star problem does not require the terminal set and Steiner node set to be disjoint. This generalized problem can be reduced to the node weighted Steiner tree problem, for which algorithms with performance guarantees of Θ(lnn) are known. However, such approach does not make use of the fact that the edge costs form a metric. In this paper we derive approximation algorithms with small constant factors for this problem. We show two different polynomial time algorithms with approximation factors of 5.16 and 5.     

Trading uninitialized space for time

The design of efficient graph algorithms usually precludes the test of edge existence, because an efficient support of that operation already requires time for the initialization of an adjacency-matrix representation. We describe an alternative representation of static directed graphs taking Θ(n+m) initialization time and using Θ(n²) space, which supports the efficient implementation of all usual operations on static graphs. The sparse graph representation allows the design of efficient graph algorithms using both iteration over all vertices adjacent with a given vertex and edge-existence operations, although at the expense of additional (uninitialized) space which may, nevertheless, be used for other purposes. To the best of our knowledge, the representation leads to the first graph algorithms with the disconcerting property that the time complexity is better than the space complexity.     

Parallel Algorithms for Series Parallel Graphs and Graphs with Treewidth Two 1

In this paper a parallel algorithm is given that, given a graph G=(V,E) , decides whether G is a series parallel graph, and, if so, builds a decomposition tree for G of series and parallel composition rules. The algorithm uses O(log \kern -1pt |E|log ^\ast \kern -1pt |E|) time and O(|E|) operations on an EREW PRAM, and O(log \kern -1pt |E|) time and O(|E|) operations on a CRCW PRAM. The results hold for undirected as well as for directed graphs. Algorithms with the same resource bounds are described for the recognition of graphs of treewidth two, and for constructing tree decompositions of treewidth two. Hence efficient parallel algorithms can be found for a large number of graph problems on series parallel graphs and graphs with treewidth two. These include many well-known problems like all problems that can be stated in monadic second-order logic. Received July 15, 1997; revised January 29, 1999, and June 23, 1999.     

Spanning trees with minimum weighted degrees

Given a metric graph G, we are concerned with finding a spanning tree of G where the maximum weighted degree of its vertices is minimum. In a metric graph (or its spanning tree), the weighted degree of a vertex is defined as the sum of the weights of its incident edges. In this paper, we propose a 4.5-approximation algorithm for this problem. We also prove it is NP-hard to approximate this problem within a 2−ε factor.     

Algorithms for a Class of Isotonic Regression Problems

The isotonic regression problem has applications in statistics, operations research, and image processing. In this paper a general framework for the isotonic regression algorithm is proposed. Under this framework, we discuss the isotonic regression problem in the case where the directed graph specifying the order restriction is a directed tree with n vertices. A new algorithm is presented for this case, which can be regarded as a generalization of the PAV algorithm of Ayer et al. Using a simple tree structure such as the binomial heap, the algorithm can be implemented in O(n log n) time, improving the previously best known O(n ² ) time algorithm. We also present linear time algorithms for special cases where the directed graph is a path or a star. Received September 2, 1997; revised January 2, 1998, and February 16, 1998.