Efficient Fully-Compressed Sequence Representations

We present a data structure that stores a sequence s[1..n] over alphabet [1..σ] in $n\mathcal{H}_{0}(s) + o(n)(\mathcal {H}_{0}(s){+}1)$ bits, where $\mathcal{H}_{0}(s)$ is the zero-order entropy of s. This structure supports the queries access, rank and select, which are fundamental building blocks for many other compressed data structures, in worst-case time ${\mathcal{O} ( {\lg\lg\sigma} )}$ and average time ${\mathcal{O} ( {\lg\mathcal{H}_{0}(s)} )}$ . The worst-case complexity matches the best previous results, yet these had been achieved with data structures using $n\mathcal{H}_{0}(s)+o(n\lg \sigma)$ bits. On highly compressible sequences the o(nlgσ) bits of the redundancy may be significant compared to the $n\mathcal{H}_{0}(s)$ bits that encode the data. Our representation, instead, compresses the redundancy as well. Moreover, our average-case complexity is unprecedented. Our technique is based on partitioning the alphabet into characters of similar frequency. The subsequence corresponding to each group can then be encoded using fast uncompressed representations without harming the overall compression ratios, even in the redundancy. The result also improves upon the best current compressed representations of several other data structures. For example, we achieve (i) compressed redundancy, retaining the best time complexities, for the smallest existing full-text self-indexes; (ii) compressed permutations π with times for π() and π ^?1() improved to loglogarithmic; and (iii) the first compressed representation of dynamic collections of disjoint sets. We also point out various applications to inverted indexes, suffix arrays, binary relations, and data compressors. Our structure is practical on large alphabets. Our experiments show that, as predicted by theory, it dominates the space/time tradeoff map of all the sequence representations, both in synthetic and application scenarios.     

Orthogonal Graph Drawing with Flexibility Constraints

Traditionally, the quality of orthogonal planar drawings is quantified by either the total number of bends, or the maximum number of bends per edge. However, this neglects that in typical applications, edges have varying importance. In this work, we investigate an approach that allows to specify the maximum number of bends for each edge individually, depending on its importance. We consider a new problem called FlexDraw that is defined as follows. Given a planar graph G=(V,E) on n vertices with maximum degree 4 and a function $\operatorname{flex}: E \longrightarrow\mathbb{N}_{0}$ that assigns a flexibility to each edge, does G admit a planar embedding on the grid such that each edge e has at most $\operatorname{flex}(e)$ bends? Note that in our setting the combinatorial embedding of G is not fixed. FlexDraw directly extends the problem β-embeddability asking whether G can be embedded with at most β bends per edge. We give an algorithm with running-time O(n ²) solving FlexDraw when the flexibility of each edge is positive. This includes 1-embeddability as a special case and thus closes the complexity gap between 0-embeddability, which is $\mathcal{NP}$ -hard to decide, and 2-embeddability, which is efficiently solvable since every planar graph with maximum degree 4 admits a 2-embedding except for the octahedron. In addition to the polynomial-time algorithm we show that FlexDraw is $\mathcal{NP}$ -hard even if the edges with flexibility 0 induce a tree or a union of disjoint stars.     

Amplifying circuit lower bounds against polynomial time, with applications

We give a self-reduction for the Circuit Evaluation problem (CircEval) and prove the following consequences.

1. Amplifying size–depth lower bounds. If CircEval has Boolean circuits of n ^k size and n ^1?δ depth for some k and δ, then for every ${\epsilon > 0}$ , there is a δ′ > 0 such that CircEval has circuits of ${n^{1 + \epsilon}}$ size and ${n^{1- \delta^{\prime}}}$ depth. Moreover, the resulting circuits require only ${\tilde{O}(n^{\epsilon})}$ bits of non-uniformity to construct. As a consequence, strong enough depth lower bounds for Circuit Evaluation imply a full separation of P and NC (even with a weak size lower bound).
2. Lower bounds for quantified Boolean formulas. Let c, d > 1 and e < 1 satisfy c < (1 ? e + d )/d. Either the problem of recognizing valid quantified Boolean formulas (QBF) is not solvable in TIME[n ^c ], or the Circuit Evaluation problem cannot be solved with circuits of n ^d size and n ^e depth. This implies unconditional polynomial-time uniform circuit lower bounds for solving QBF. We also prove that QBF does not have n ^c -time uniform NC circuits, for all c < 2.

     

Finding Induced Paths of Given Parity in Claw-Free Graphs

The Parity Path problem is to decide if a given graph contains both an induced path of odd length and an induced path of even length between two specified vertices. In the related problems Odd Induced Path and Even Induced Path, the goal is to determine whether an induced path of odd, respectively even, length between two specified vertices exists. Although all three problems are NP-complete in general, we show that they can be solved in $\mathcal{O}(n^{5})$ time for the class of claw-free graphs. Two vertices s and t form an even pair in G if every induced path from s to t in G has even length. Our results imply that the problem of deciding if two specified vertices of a claw-free graph form an even pair, as well as the problem of deciding if a given claw-free graph has an even pair, can be solved in $\mathcal{O}(n^{5})$ time and $\mathcal{O}(n^{7})$ time, respectively. We also show that we can decide in $\mathcal{O}(n^{7})$ time whether a claw-free graph has an induced cycle of given parity through a specified vertex. Finally, we show that a shortest induced path of given parity between two specified vertices of a claw-free perfect graph can be found in $\mathcal {O}(n^{7})$ time.     

DNF sparsification and a faster deterministic counting algorithm

Given a DNF formula f on n variables, the two natural size measures are the number of terms or size s(f) and the maximum width of a term w(f). It is folklore that small DNF formulas can be made narrow: if a formula has m terms, it can be ${\epsilon}$ -approximated by a formula with width ${{\rm log}(m/{\epsilon})}$ . We prove a converse, showing that narrow formulas can be sparsified. More precisely, any width w DNF irrespective of its size can be ${\epsilon}$ -approximated by a width w DNF with at most ${(w\, {\rm log}(1/{\epsilon}))^{O(w)}}$ terms. We combine our sparsification result with the work of Luby & Velickovic (1991, Algorithmica 16(4/5):415–433, 1996) to give a faster deterministic algorithm for approximately counting the number of satisfying solutions to a DNF. Given a formula on n variables with poly(n) terms, we give a deterministic ${n^{\tilde{O}({\rm log}\, {\rm log} (n))}}$ time algorithm that computes an additive ${\epsilon}$ approximation to the fraction of satisfying assignments of f for ${\epsilon = 1/{\rm poly}({\rm log}\, n)}$ . The previous best result due to Luby and Velickovic from nearly two decades ago had a run time of ${n^{{\rm exp}(O(\sqrt{{\rm log}\, {\rm log} n}))}}$ (Luby & Velickovic 1991, in Algorithmica 16(4/5):415–433, 1996).     

On the power of unambiguity in log-space

We report progress on the NL versus UL problem.

We show that counting the number of s-t paths in graphs where the number of s-v paths for any v is bounded by a polynomial can be done in FUL: the unambiguous log-space function class. Several new upper bounds follow from this including ${{{ReachFewL} \subseteq {UL}}}$ and ${{{LFew} \subseteq {UL}^{FewL}}}$

We investigate the complexity of min-uniqueness—a central notion in studying the NL versus UL problem. In this regard we revisit the class OptL[log n] and introduce UOptL[log n], an unambiguous version of OptL[log n]. We investigate the relation between UOptL[log n] and other existing complexity classes.

We consider the unambiguous hierarchies over UL and UOptL[log n]. We show that the hierarchy over UOptL[log n] collapses. This implies that ${{{ULH} \subseteq {L}^{{promiseUL}}}}$ thus collapsing the UL hierarchy.

We show that the reachability problem over graphs embedded on 3 pages is complete for NL. This contrasts with the reachability problem over graphs embedded on 2 pages, which is log-space equivalent to the reachability problem in planar graphs and hence is in UL.

     

Exact and Parameterized Algorithms for Max Internal Spanning Tree

We consider the $\mathcal{NP}$ -hard problem of finding a spanning tree with a maximum number of internal vertices. This problem is a generalization of the famous Hamiltonian Path problem. Our dynamic-programming algorithms for general and degree-bounded graphs have running times of the form $\mathcal{O}^{*}(c^{n})$ with c≤2. For graphs with bounded degree, c<2. The main result, however, is a branching algorithm for graphs with maximum degree three. It only needs polynomial space and has a running time of $\mathcal{O}(1.8612^{n})$ when analyzed with respect to the number of vertices. We also show that its running time is $2.1364^{k} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ when the goal is to find a spanning tree with at least k internal vertices. Both running time bounds are obtained via a Measure & Conquer analysis, the latter one being a novel use of this kind of analysis for parameterized algorithms.     

ATP and Presentation Service for Mizar Formalizations

This paper describes the Automated Reasoning for Mizar ( $\textsf{Miz}\mathbb{AR}$ ) service, which integrates several automated reasoning, artificial intelligence, and presentation tools with Mizar and its authoring environment. The service provides ATP assistance to Mizar authors in finding and explaining proofs, and offers generation of Mizar problems as challenges to ATP systems. The service is based on a sound translation from the Mizar language to that of first-order ATP systems, and relies on the recent progress in application of ATP systems in large theories containing tens of thousands of available facts. We present the main features of $\textsf{Miz}\mathbb{AR}$ services, followed by an account of initial experiments in finding proofs with the ATP assistance. Our initial experience indicates that the tool offers substantial help in exploring the Mizar library and in preparing new Mizar articles.     

Resource Trade-offs in Syntactically Multilinear Arithmetic Circuits

The class of polynomials computable by polynomial size log-depth arithmetic circuits (VNC ¹) is known to be computable by constant width polynomial degree circuits (VsSC ⁰), but whether the converse containment holds is an open problem. As a partial answer to this question, we give a construction which shows that syntactically multilinear circuits of constant width and polynomial degree can be depth-reduced, which in our notation shows that sm-VsSC ⁰ ${\subseteq}$ ? sm-VNC ¹. We further strengthen this inclusion, by giving a separate construction that provides a width-efficient simulation for constant width syntactically multilinear circuits by constant width syntactically multilinear algebraic branching programs; in our notation, sm-VsSC ⁰ ${\subseteq}$ ? sm-VBWBP. We then focus on polynomial size syntactically multilinear circuits and study relationships between classes of functions obtained by imposing various resource (width, depth, degree) restrictions on these circuits. Along the way, we also observe a characterization of the class NC ¹ in terms of a restricted class of planar branching programs of polynomial size. Finally, in contrast to the general case, we report closure and stability of coefficient functions for the syntactically multilinear classes studied in this paper.     

Near-Linear Approximation Algorithms for Geometric Hitting Sets

Given a range space $(X,\mathcal{R})$ , where $\mathcal{R}\subset2^{X}$ , the hitting set problem is to find a smallest-cardinality subset H?X that intersects each set in $\mathcal{R}$ . We present near-linear-time approximation algorithms for the hitting set problem in the following geometric settings: (i)? $\mathcal{R}$ is a set of planar regions with small union complexity. (ii)? $\mathcal{R}$ is a set of axis-parallel d-dimensional boxes in ? ^d . In both cases X is either the entire ? ^d , or a finite set of points in ? ^d . The approximation factors yielded by the algorithm are small; they are either the same as, or within very small factors off the best factors known to be computable in polynomial time.     

On matrices, automata, and double counting in constraint programming

Matrix models are ubiquitous for constraint problems. Many such problems have a matrix of variables $\mathcal{M}$ , with the same constraint C defined by a finite-state automaton $\mathcal{A}$ on each row of $\mathcal{M}$ and a global cardinality constraint $\mathit{gcc}$ on each column of $\mathcal{M}$ . We give two methods for deriving, by double counting, necessary conditions on the cardinality variables of the $\mathit{gcc}$ constraints from the automaton $\mathcal{A}$ . The first method yields linear necessary conditions and simple arithmetic constraints. The second method introduces the cardinality automaton, which abstracts the overall behaviour of all the row automata and can be encoded by a set of linear constraints. We also provide a domain consistency filtering algorithm for the conjunction of lexicographic ordering constraints between adjacent rows of $\mathcal{M}$ and (possibly different) automaton constraints on the rows. We evaluate the impact of our methods in terms of runtime and search effort on a large set of nurse rostering problem instances.     

Rounds in Combinatorial Search

A set system $\mathcal{H} \subseteq2^{[m]}$ is said to be separating if for every pair of distinct elements x,y∈[m] there exists a set $H\in\mathcal{H}$ such that H contains exactly one of them. The search complexity of a separating system $\mathcal{H} \subseteq 2^{[m]}$ is the minimum number of questions of type “x∈H?” (where $H \in\mathcal{H}$ ) needed in the worst case to determine a hidden element x∈[m]. If we receive the answer before asking a new question then we speak of the adaptive complexity, denoted by $\mathrm{c} (\mathcal{H})$ ; if the questions are all fixed beforehand then we speak of the non-adaptive complexity, denoted by $\mathrm{c}_{na} (\mathcal{H})$ . If we are allowed to ask the questions in at most k rounds then we speak of the k-round complexity of $\mathcal{H}$ , denoted by $\mathrm{c}_{k} (\mathcal{H})$ . It is clear that $|\mathcal{H}| \geq\mathrm{c}_{na} (\mathcal{H}) = \mathrm{c}_{1} (\mathcal{H}) \geq\mathrm{c}_{2} (\mathcal{H}) \geq\cdots\geq\mathrm{c}_{m} (\mathcal{H}) = \mathrm{c} (\mathcal{H})$ . A group of problems raised by G.O.H. Katona is to characterize those separating systems for which some of these inequalities are tight. In this paper we are discussing set systems $\mathcal{H}$ with the property $|\mathcal{H}| = \mathrm{c}_{k} (\mathcal{H}) $ for any k≥3. We give a necessary condition for this property by proving a theorem about traces of hypergraphs which also has its own interest.     

Generalising Unit-Refutation Completeness and SLUR via Nested Input Resolution

The class ${\mathcal{SLUR}}$ (Single Lookahead Unit Resolution) was introduced in Schlipf et al. (Inf Process Lett 54:133–137, 1995) as an umbrella class for efficient (poly-time) SAT solving, with linear-time SAT decision, while the recognition problem was not considered. ?epek et al. (2012) and Balyo et al. (2012) extended this class in various ways to hierarchies covering all of CNF (all clause-sets). We introduce a hierarchy ${\mathcal{SLUR}}_k$ which we argue is the natural “limit” of such approaches. The second source for our investigations is the class ${\mathcal{UC}}$ of unit-refutation complete clause-sets, introduced in del Val (1994) as a target class for knowledge compilation. Via the theory of “hardness” of clause-sets as developed in Kullmann (1999), Kullmann (Ann Math Artif Intell 40(3–4):303–352, 2004) and Ansótegui et al. (2008) we obtain a natural generalisation ${\mathcal{UC}}_k$ , containing those clause-sets which are “unit-refutation complete of level k”, which is the same as having hardness at most k. Utilising the strong connections to (tree-)resolution complexity and (nested) input resolution, we develop basic methods for the determination of hardness (the level k in ${\mathcal{UC}}_k$ ). A fundamental insight now is that ${\mathcal{SLUR}}_k = {\mathcal{UC}}_k$ holds for all k. We can thus exploit both streams of intuitions and methods for the investigations of these hierarchies. As an application we can easily show that the hierarchies from ?epek et al. (2012) and Balyo et al. (2012) are strongly subsumed by ${\mathcal{SLUR}}_k$ . Finally we consider the problem of “irredundant” clause-sets in ${\mathcal{UC}}_k$ . For 2-CNF we show that strong minimisations are possible in polynomial time, while already for (very special) Horn clause-sets minimisation is NP-complete. We conclude with an extensive discussion of open problems and future directions. We envisage the concepts investigated here to be the starting point for a theory of good SAT translations, which brings together the good SAT-solving aspects from ${\mathcal{SLUR}}$ together with the knowledge-representation aspects from ${\mathcal{UC}}$ , and expands this combination via notions of “hardness”.     

Job-shop scheduling in a body shop

We study a generalized job-shop problem called the body shop scheduling problem (BSSP). This problem arises from the industrial application of welding in a car body production line, where possible collisions between industrial robots have to be taken into account. BSSP corresponds to a job-shop problem where the operations of a job have to follow alternating routes on the machines, certain operations of different jobs are not allowed to be processed at the same time and after processing an operation of a certain job a machine might be unavailable for a given time for operations of other jobs. As main results we will show that for three jobs and four machines the special case where only one machine is used by more than one job is already $\mathcal NP $ -hard. This also implies that the single machine scheduling problem that asks for a makespan minimal schedule of three chains of operations with delays between the operations of a chain is $\mathcal NP $ -hard. On the positive side, we present a polynomial algorithm for the two job case and a pseudo-polynomial algorithm together with an FPTAS  for an arbitrary but constant number of jobs. Hence for a constant number of jobs we fully settle the complexity status of the problem.     

Approximation Algorithms and Hardness Results for Packing Element-Disjoint Steiner Trees in Planar Graphs

We study the problem of packing element-disjoint Steiner trees in graphs. We are given a graph and a designated subset of terminal nodes, and the goal is to find a maximum cardinality set of element-disjoint trees such that each tree contains every terminal node. An element means a non-terminal node or an edge. (Thus, each non-terminal node and each edge must be in at most one of the trees.) We show that the problem is APX-hard when there are only three terminal nodes, thus answering an open question. Our main focus is on the special case when the graph is planar. We show that the problem of finding two element-disjoint Steiner trees in a planar graph is NP-hard. Similarly, the problem of finding two edge-disjoint Steiner trees in a planar graph is NP-hard. We design an algorithm for planar graphs that achieves an approximation guarantee close to 2. In fact, given a planar graph that is k element-connected on the terminals (k is an upper bound on the number of element-disjoint Steiner trees), the algorithm returns $\lfloor\frac{k}{2} \rfloor-1$ element-disjoint Steiner trees. Using this algorithm, we get an approximation algorithm for the edge-disjoint version of the problem on planar graphs that improves on the previous approximation guarantees. We also show that the natural LP relaxation of the planar problem has an integrality ratio approaching?2.     

Two-Way Automata Versus Logarithmic Space

We strengthen a previously known connection between the size complexity of two-way finite automata ( ) and the space complexity of Turing machines (tms). Specifically, we prove that

every s-state has a poly(s)-state that agrees with it on all inputs of length ≤s if and only if NL?L/poly, and

every s-state has a poly(s)-state that agrees with it on all inputs of length ≤2 ^s if and only if NLL?LL/polylog.

Here, and are the deterministic and nondeterministic , NL and L/poly are the standard classes of languages recognizable in logarithmic space by nondeterministic tms and by deterministic tms with access to polynomially long advice, and NLL and LL/polylog are the corresponding complexity classes for space O(loglogn) and advice length poly(logn). Our arguments strengthen and extend an old theorem by Berman and Lingas and can be used to obtain variants of the above statements for other modes of computation or other combinations of bounds for the input length, the space usage, and the length of advice.     

Resource augmentation for uniprocessor and multiprocessor partitioned scheduling of sporadic real-time tasks

Although the earliest-deadline-first (EDF) policy is known to be optimal for preemptive real-time task scheduling in uniprocessor systems, the schedulability analysis problem has recently been shown to be $\mathit{co}\mathcal{NP}$ -hard. Therefore, approximation algorithms, and in particular, approximations based on resource augmentation have attracted a lot of attention for both uniprocessor and multiprocessor systems. Resource augmentation based approximations assume a certain speedup of the processor(s). Using the notion of approximate demand bound function (dbf), in this paper we show that for uniprocessor systems the resource augmentation factor is at most $\frac{2e-1}{e} \approx1.6322$ , where e is the Euler number. We approximate the dbf using a linear approximation when the analysis interval length of interest is larger than the relative deadline of the task. For identical multiprocessor systems with M processors and constrained-deadline task sets, we show that the deadline-monotonic partitioning (that has been proposed by Baruah and Fisher) with the approximate dbf leads to an approximation factor of $\frac{3e-1}{e}-\frac{1}{M} \approx 2.6322-\frac{1}{M}$ with respect to resource augmentation. We also show that the corresponding factor is $3-\frac{1}{M}$ for arbitrary-deadline task sets. The best known results so far were $3-\frac{1}{M}$ for constrained-deadline tasks and $4-\frac {2}{M}$ for arbitrary-deadline ones. Our tighter analysis exploits the structure of the approximate dbf directly and uses the processor utilization violations (which were ignored in all previous analysis) for analyzing resource augmentation factors. We also provide concrete input instances to show that the lower bound on the resource augmentation factor for uniprocessor systems—using the above approximate dbf—is 1.5, and the corresponding bound is 2.5 for identical multiprocessor systems with an arbitrary order of fitting and a large number of processors. Further, we also provide a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) to derive near-optimal solutions under the assumption that the ratio of the maximum relative deadline to the minimum relative deadline of tasks is a constant, which is a more relaxed assumption compared to the assumptions required for deriving such a PTAS in the past.     

Delayed theory combination vs. Nelson-Oppen for satisfiability modulo theories: a comparative analysis

Most state-of-the-art approaches for Satisfiability Modulo Theories $(SMT(\mathcal{T}))$ rely on the integration between a SAT solver and a decision procedure for sets of literals in the background theory $\mathcal{T} (\mathcal{T}{\text {-}}solver)$ . Often $\mathcal{T}$ is the combination $\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2$ of two (or more) simpler theories $(SMT(\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2))$ , s.t. the specific ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ must be combined. Up to a few years ago, the standard approach to $SMT(\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2)$ was to integrate the SAT solver with one combined $\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2{\text {-}}solver$ , obtained from two distinct ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ by means of evolutions of Nelson and Oppen’s (NO) combination procedure, in which the ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ deduce and exchange interface equalities. Nowadays many state-of-the-art SMT solvers use evolutions of a more recent $SMT(\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2)$ procedure called Delayed Theory Combination (DTC), in which each ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solver$ interacts directly and only with the SAT solver, in such a way that part or all of the (possibly very expensive) reasoning effort on interface equalities is delegated to the SAT solver itself. In this paper we present a comparative analysis of DTC vs. NO for $SMT(\mathcal{T}_1 \cup \mathcal{T}_2)$ . On the one hand, we explain the advantages of DTC in exploiting the power of modern SAT solvers to reduce the search. On the other hand, we show that the extra amount of Boolean search required to the SAT solver can be controlled. In fact, we prove two novel theoretical results, for both convex and non-convex theories and for different deduction capabilities of the ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ , which relate the amount of extra Boolean search required to the SAT solver by DTC with the number of deductions and case-splits required to the ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ by NO in order to perform the same tasks: (i) under the same hypotheses of deduction capabilities of the ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ required by NO, DTC causes no extra Boolean search; (ii) using ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ with limited or no deduction capabilities, the extra Boolean search required can be reduced down to a negligible amount by controlling the quality of the $\mathcal{T}$ -conflict sets returned by the ${\mathcal{T}_i}{\text {-}}solvers$ .     

Proper Interval Vertex Deletion

The NP-complete problem Proper Interval Vertex Deletion is to decide whether an input graph on n vertices and m edges can be turned into a proper interval graph by deleting at most k vertices. Van Bevern et al. (In: Proceedings WG 2010. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 6410, pp. 232–243, 2010) showed that this problem can be solved in $\mathcal {O}((14k +14)^{k+1} kn^{6})$ time. We improve this result by presenting an $\mathcal {O}(6^{k} kn^{6})$ time algorithm for Proper Interval Vertex Deletion. Our fixed-parameter algorithm is based on a new structural result stating that every connected component of a {claw,net,tent,C ₄,C ₅,C ₆}-free graph is a proper circular arc graph, combined with a simple greedy algorithm that solves Proper Interval Vertex Deletion on {claw,net,tent,C ₄,C ₅,C ₆}-free graphs in $\mathcal {O}(n+m)$ time. Our approach also yields a polynomial-time 6-approximation algorithm for the optimization variant of Proper Interval Vertex Deletion.