Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: diagnosis, prognostic factors, and staging

Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) is an infrequent disease usually affecting elderly people. Due to the lack of a specific marker for MMM, efforts are being made to refine the diagnostic criteria. A prefibrotic form of the disease has recently been recognized and a set of diagnostic criteria proposed by the Italian Consensus Conference for the Diagnostic Criteria of MMM. Moreover, the number of circulating CD34(+) cells has recently been proven to be useful in the differential diagnosis of the disease. Median survival of patients with MMM is about 5 years, but there is wide variability. Hemoglobin level at diagnosis is the most important prognostic factor, whereas age, constitutional symptoms, low or high leukocyte counts, blood blast cells, cytogenetic abnormalities, and number of circulating CD34(+) cells are also of prognostic value. Based on some of the above factors, several prognostic systems of MMM have been proposed to identify at presentation subgroups of patients with a different risk profile. This is especially important in younger individuals, who may benefit from therapies that have curative potential but also involve a mortality risk (notably, allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation). Since no disease-oriented therapies for MMM are currently available and treatment is based on palliation and improvement of quality of life, therapy should be formulated according to the form of presentation of the disease and its prognostic implications. A staging system for MMM that meets treatment requirements and available therapeutic resources should be developed by considering parameters able to predict not only survival but also other disease outcomes, such as development of anemia, thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, and blast transformation. Such a staging system should be derived from a large population of patients, systematically collected from diagnosis without selection bias and followed over time.     

Prognostic diversity among cytogenetic abnormalities in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30-50% of patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) demonstrate detectable cytogenetic abnormalities, the prognostic value of which has not been completely defined by previous retrospective studies. The current prospective study addresses this issue in the context of currently accepted independent prognostic variables. METHODS: The current study is a single institution study in which patients with MMM were accrued between January 2000 and August 2001 and followed in a prospective fashion. All study patients underwent bone marrow examination with cytogenetic studies as well as comprehensive clinical and laboratory evaluation at the time of karyotype analysis. RESULTS: Among the study cohort of 81 patients (with a median age of 61 years; 54 males), the cytogenetic findings were normal in 44 patients (54%; Group 1). The remaining 37 patients (46%) demonstrated either interstitial deletions involving the long arm of chromosome 13 or 20 (9 patients; Group 2) or other abnormalities (28 patients; Group 3). All study patients were followed prospectively for a minimum of 40 months (range, 40-55 months). Survival from the time of karyotypic analysis was found to be similar between Groups 1 and 2 but was significantly worse in Group 3. Furthermore, none of the patients in Group 2 experienced leukemic transformation, whereas five patients each from the other two groups did. Multivariate analysis identified an unfavorable cytogenetic profile (Group 3), > or = 1% circulating blasts, a hemoglobin level of <10 g/dL, and constitutional symptoms as adverse prognostic features for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Specific cytogenetic lesions in patients with MMM might carry an independent prognostic effect for both survival and the risk of leukemic transformation. Such information should assist in decision making when considering aggressive treatment approaches.     

New Drugs for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis

Managing patients with myelofibrosis (MF)—either those with primary MF or those whose MF has evolved from antecedent polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia—presents many challenges to the hematologist. Cure is potentially achievable through allogeneic stem cell transplantation, but this therapy is either inappropriate or not feasible for most patients. MF patients suffer from a range of debilitating disease manifestations (eg, massive splenomegaly, cytopenias, constitutional symptoms, and transformation to a treatment-refractory blast phase). Currently available therapies are palliative but can be of significant value to some MF patients for anemia, splenomegaly, or sometimes both manifestations. New medical therapies for MF revolve around three main themes: immunomodulation (to assist anemia), hypomethylation strategies, and (the most robust pipeline) the use of targeted JAK2 inhibitors. These latter agents have shown the ability to improve MF-associated splenomegaly and MF-associated symptoms but do not improve (and may exacerbate) anemia or thrombocytopenia. Future targeted agents, and perhaps combinations of agents that currently show complementary benefits, are anticipated to further enhance the efficacy of medical therapy for MF.     

New approaches in the treatment of myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) is a chronic clonal neoangiogenesis disorder characterized by bone marrow fibrosis and neoangiogensis with extramedullary hematopoiesis. Identification of prognostic factors associated with MMM have not impacted the treatment of the disease, which continues to be palliative with the exception of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for potential long-term disease-free survival in selected patients. Additional insights into the pathophysiology of MMM have resulted in the use of novel therapeutic strategies in the treatment of this disease. The rationale for the investigation of these agents in MMM and the status of clinical trials with various modalities such as angiogenesis inhibitors (e.g., thalidomide), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., imatinib mesylate), farnesyl transferase inhibitors (e.g., R115777), and other agents are reviewed, in addition to the potential roles of autologous and allogeneic SCT.     

Conventional and new treatment options for myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia

The pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the clonal myeloproliferation and reactive marrow fibrosis that characterize myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) are poorly understood. Recent advances into the pathophysiology of the disease have not yet translated into effective therapeutic options for patients. There is no standard treatment, and no therapies identified yet, besides allogeneic stem cell transplantation, that will significantly change the natural history of MMM. Treatment is therefore palliative and is geared towards alleviating symptoms of the disease and improving blood counts. Conventional therapies for anemia include androgens and corticosteroids. Cytoreductive agents such as hydroxyurea are indicated for symptomatic organomegaly and the control of leucocytosis or thrombocytosis. Several novel agents have been investigated in the recent past, and include antiangiogenic agents and signal transduction inhibitors that target the angiogenic and fibrogenic cytokines that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of the detrimental bone marrow stromal reaction. Ultimately, an improved understanding of the biological factors that cause the clonal myeloproliferation in MMM will lead to the development of effective therapeutic interventions.     

State-of-the-Art Review on Myelofibrosis Therapies

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a BCR-ABL1–negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by anemia, extramedullary hematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms and acute myeloid leukemia progression. Currently, allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) therapy is the only curative option for MF patients. However, AHSCT is strictly limited due to the high rates of morbidity and mortality. Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor Ruxolitinib is the first-line treatment for intermediate-II or high-risk MF patients with splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, but most MF patients develop resistance or intolerance to Ruxolitinib. Therefore, MF treatment is a challenge for the medical community. This review summarizes 3 investigated directions for MF therapy: monotherapies of JAK inhibitors, monotherapies of non-JAK targeted agents, combination therapies of Ruxolitinib and other agents. We emphasize combination of Ruxolitinib and other agents is a promising strategy.     

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) is a clonal disorder resulting from the proliferation of aberrant hematopoietic progenitors. Hence MMM is curable if the abnormal clone can be eradicated and replaced by normal cells from healthy donors. Myeloablative allogeneic transplantation results in high rates of durable engraftment and cure in approximately 50% of patients. Treatment-related mortality rather than disease recurrence accounts for the majority of treatment failures. Higher rates of treatment failure are associated with more advanced disease and age. More recently, nonmyeloablative (reduced-intensity) conditioning regimens have been shown to induce encouraging rates of engraftment and prolonged survival. When recommending transplantation for a particular patient, the prospect of cure should be weighed against the considerable risks of the procedure. Transplantation is typically recommended for patients under the age of 50 years with intermediate- and high-risk features, or for patients aged 50 to 60 years with an anticipated survival of less than 5 years. Finally, autologous transplantation has also been evaluated as a potential treatment approach. This procedure is unlikely to be curative, but might have a palliative role.     

Presence of unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities is the strongest predictor of poor survival in secondary myelofibrosis

BACKGROUND: Postpolycythemic (PV) and postthrombocythemic (ET) myeloid metaplasia are consensually referred to as secondary myelofibrosis (sMF). Prognostic variables in sMF are not as well defined as they are for de novo myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM), which is also known as agnogenic myeloid metaplasia (AMM). Such information is particularly crucial for management decisions in transplant-eligible patients. METHODS: Diagnoses of PV and ET required fulfillment of the World Health Organization criteria for the diagnosis of MMM as well as an antecedent history of either polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia that was supported by bone marrow examination. Cytogenetic findings were classified as being either favorable (normal or isolated 13q- or 20q- clones) or unfavorable (presence of abnormalities other than 13q- and 20q-). RESULTS: The study population was comprised of 66 young patients (age <60 yrs) with sMF, including 37 patients with PV and 29 patients with ET. Multivariate analysis of parameters other than cytogenetics identified older age (P = .02), anemia (hemoglobin level <10 g/dL [P = .007]), and PV (P = .009) to be independent risk factors for shortened survival. However, when such analysis was restricted to patients in whom cytogenetic studies were performed (n = 31 patients), the presence of unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities (i.e., clones other than 20q- and 13q-) became the only adverse prognostic factor for survival (P = .001). A similar analysis in a temporal cohort of 50 age-matched patients with AMM also identified unfavorable cytogenetics as an independent predictor of poor survival, along with thrombocytopenia and anemia. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that cytogenetic findings might supersede AMM-derived prognostic scoring systems for predicting survival in patients with sMF.     

Contemporary Risk Stratification and Treatment of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by absolute monocytosis, one or more lineage dysplasia, and proliferative features including myeloid hyperplasia, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms. Because of vast clinical heterogeneity in presentation and course, risk stratification is used for a risk‐adapted treatment strategy. Numerous prognostic scoring systems exist, some of which incorporate mutational information. Treatment ranges from observation to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therapies include hydroxyurea for cytoreduction, hypomethylating agents, and the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib to address splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. Recently, oral decitabine with cedazuridine was approved and represents a convenient treatment option for CMML patients. Although novel therapeutics are in development for CMML, further work is needed to elucidate possible targets unique to the CMML clone. In this review, we will detail the pathophysiology, risk stratification, available treatment modalities, and novel therapies for CMML, and propose a modern treatment algorithm.Implications for PracticeChronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clinically heterogenous disease, which poses significant management challenges. The diagnosis of CMML requires bone marrow biopsy and aspirate with thorough evaluation. Risk stratification and symptom assessment are essential to designing an effective treatment plan, which may include hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in intermediate or high‐risk patients. The recently approved oral decitabine/cedazuridine provides a convenient alternative to parenteral HMAs. Ruxolitinib may be effective in ameliorating proliferative symptoms and splenomegaly. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only treatment with curative potential; however, novel therapies are in clinical development which may significantly alter the therapeutic landscape of CMML.     

In vitro antiproliferative activity of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 in hematopoietic progenitors from patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia.

R115777 is an orally bioavailable farnesyltransferase inhibitor (FTI) that has displayed encouraging activity in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. To determine whether R115777 might exert similar activity in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM), we evaluated its effects on circulating myeloid progenitor cells from patients with MMM (n=25) using in vitro colony-forming assays. The median R115777 concentrations that inhibited colony formation by 50% were 34 and 2.7 nM for myeloid and megakaryocytic colonies from MMM patients, respectively. Progenitors from normal controls and patients with other myeloproliferative disorders demonstrated similar sensitivity. Since the ras polypeptides are one putative target of FTIs, the potential role of ras effectors was examined by incubating parallel progenitor assays with the phosphatidyl-inositol-3 (PI-3) kinase inhibitor LY294002 and the mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 inhibitor PD98059. MMM progenitor colonies (n=7) were highly sensitive to LY294002 but not to PD98059, implying that the PI-3 kinase pathway may be critical for survival and proliferation of these cells. In addition to indicating that MMM progenitors are sensitive to clinically achievable R115777 concentrations in vitro, these results provide a potential explanation for the thrombocytopenia observed with R115777 during the treatment of other hematologic malignancies.     

Ruxolitinib Rechallenge Can Improve Constitutional Symptoms and Splenomegaly in Patients With Myelofibrosis: A Case Series

Introduction

Myelofibrosis (MF) is one of the classic myeloproliferative neoplasms and can occur de novo or following transformation from polycythemia vera (PPV MF) or essential thrombocythemia (PET MF). It can be associated with constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly, both of which can negatively impact quality of life. The only curative option for MF is allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Studies have shown that JAK2 inhibitors such as ruxolitinib are effective in reducing both splenomegaly and symptom burden. Although there is no approved treatment for patients who progress on ruxolitinib, anecdotal evidence suggests patients may respond to a re-challenge of ruxolitinib after drug cessation.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced primary breast cancers: the Nottingham experience.

AIM: Of our study was to assess and compare the outcome of patients undergoing anthracycline based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced primary breast cancers with patients receiving mitoxantrone, methotrexate and mitomycin (MMM) as neoadjuvant agents. METHODS: Records of 50 consecutive patients receiving anthrcycline based chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancers from July 1996 to July 2004 were analysed with regard to locoregional recurrence, metastasis and survival. The MMM group comprised of 56 consecutive patients receiving MMM chemotherapy between 1989 and 1994. The unit protocol for patients receiving multimodal therapy has been neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by Patey's mastectomy, radiotherapy and endocrine treatment if ER-positive. Patients were followed-up in the clinic until either death or the last clinic visit on or before December 2005 in the anthracycline group and on or before December 1999 in the MMM group. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to number of patients, tumour size, grade, ER positivity and median duration of follow-up from start of chemotherapy. Significantly more patients in the anthracycline group had complete clinical response and 44% of the patients in anthracycline group had node negative disease compared to 4% in the MMM group. Anthracycline group when compared to MMM group had a lower incidence of locoregional recurrence (6% vs 19%), distant metastasis (20% vs 55%) and survival (82% vs 45%) at the end of follow-up, which was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Anthracycline based neoadjuvant chemotherapy has better response and significantly better outcome compared to MMM chemotherapy.     

Circulating CD34+, CD133+, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-positive endothelial progenitor cells in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia.

PURPOSE: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are present in circulation and contribute to vasculogenesis in adults. We measured the number of circulating EPCs in patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM), and we examined the relationship between the number of EPCs and severity of the MMM disease process. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The number of EPCs was measured by assaying the CD34+CD133+ vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) -positive cell phenotype in 110 MMM patients, 16 patients with other Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative disorders (Ph-negative CMPDs), and 14 healthy participants. In four MMM patients, the capacity of selected CD34+ cells to form endothelial colonies (CFU-End) in vitro was tested. RESULTS: CD34+, CD133+, and VEGFR2-positive EPCs were detectable in unselected peripheral-blood cells of 50.9% MMM patients, 37.5% control patients, and 21% healthy participants. Patients with MMM had a median of 0.26% EPCs, significantly higher than that in healthy controls (median, 0%) and in patients with other Ph-negative CMPDs (median, 0.1%). In 14.5% of MMM patients, the numbers of EPCs were greater than the highest value found in patients with other Ph-negative CMPDs. CD34+ selected cells produced colony-forming unit-endothelial (CFU-End), which were vascular endothelial (VE) -cadherin positive, CD31+, von Willebrand factor positive, and CD45-. In MMM patients, the larger the number of EPCs, the smaller the number of circulating immature myeloid cells and circulating CD45+CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells. Increased numbers of EPCs were associated with younger age and a diagnosis of prefibrotic MMM. CONCLUSION: Circulating EPCs are elevated in MMM patients in the early stage of the disease. Heightened mobilization of EPCs may represent an important mechanism for development of neoangiogenesis in MMM.     

Risks and benefits of splenectomy in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a retrospective analysis of 26 cases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of splenectomy in myelofibrosis and myeloid metaplasia (MMM). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our records of 26 patients with MMM who underwent an open splenectomy at Boston University Medical Center between 1979 and 1995. Fourteen patients had agnogenic myeloid metaplasia (AMM) and 12 had myelofibrosis with antecedent myeloproliferative disorders (MF). The main indications for splenectomy were progressive transfusion-dependent anemia, painful splenomegaly, and hypercatabolic symptoms associated with cytopenia. RESULTS: Median time to splenectomy after the diagnosis of MMM was 29 months ranging from 1 to 96 months. Three patients (11%) died within 1 month after the surgery because of sepsis. The most common peri- and postoperative complications were pneumonia and other bacterial infections (42%), cardiac events (19%), acute bleeding (15%), ileus (15%), and venous thrombosis (12%). Of the eight surviving patients who underwent splenectomy for transfusion dependent anemia, six (75%) had improvement in their hematocrit levels with abolishment of blood transfusions. A durable symptomatic palliation was achieved in all patients. Liver enlargement was noted in seven patients at 1-year evaluation. None of these patients developed hepatic failure. Leukemic transformation occurred in 8 of 18 patients (44%) postsplenectomy. The median overall survival for the entire group was 58.5 and 28 months from the diagnosis of MMM and the time of splenectomy, respectively. There was no difference in survival rates between patients with AMM and MF. CONCLUSIONS: Splenectomy is an effective palliative procedure with an acceptable morbidity in selected patients with MMM. Progressive transfusion-dependent anemia should also be considered an indication for splenectomy in the absence of leukemic evolution.     

The forgotten myeloproliferative disorder: myeloid metaplasia

Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia is a hematologic disorder currently classified with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia as a chronic myeloproliferative disease. The median age at diagnosis is 60 years, and more than 90% of patients are diagnosed after age 40 years. Clinical manifestations include massive splenomegaly, progressive anemia, profound constitutional symptoms, and extramedullary hematopoiesis. The diagnosis is confirmed by bone marrow examination after other causes of myelofibrosis are ruled out. Median survival is 5 years and causes of death include leukemic transformation. Prognosis is adversely affected by the presence of anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dl), leukopenia or leukocytosis (white blood cells >30,000/ micro l), circulating blasts, and hypercatabolic symptoms. Conventional treatment is palliative and does not improve survival. In this regard, androgen preparations, corticosteroids, and erythropoietin are useful for the treatment of disease-associated anemia. Symptomatic splenomegaly is best managed by cytoreductive therapy or surgical removal. Radiation therapy is most useful in the treatment of nonhepatosplenic extramedullary hematopoiesis. New treatment approaches include the use of thalidomide alone or in combination with prednisone and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.     

Palliative Splenectomy in Myelofibrosis with Myeloid Metaplasia

Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) is a chronic myeloproliferative disorder in which the accumulation and growth of circulating myeloid progenitors in the spleen lead to pathologic enlargement of the organ with resulting mechanical discomfort, hypercatabolic symptoms, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and portal hypertension. Medical therapy and splenic irradiation may be of benefit in certain patients, yet many may still require splenectomy to palliate their symptoms. Although there is no clear survival advantage to splenectomy in MMM, the procedure can result in substantial palliation of symptoms. However, the surgical procedure is associated with an approximately 9% mortality rate, and the postsplenectomy occurrence of extreme thrombocytosis, hepatomegaly, and leukemic transformation is of major concern. The management of splenomegaly and the role of splenectomy in MMM are discussed in this review.     

Human central nervous system pharmacology of pentamethylmelamine and its metabolites

Pentamethylmelamine (PMM) 80 mg/m2 was administered I.V. to 8 patients during surgical resection of intracerebral tumors. PMM concentrations in tumors were generally much higher than concurrent plasma concentrations, ranging from undetectable (less than .01 micrograms/g) to as high as 4.47 micrograms/g and were much higher in malignant melanoma samples than in astrocytoma samples. PMM was barely detectable or undetectable in most samples of edematous brain tissue adjacent to intracerebral tumor and in temporalis muscle. The PMM metabolites tetramethylmelamine (TeMM), trimethylmelamine (TrMM), and dimethylmelamine (DMM) were each detectable in tumor samples from one or two patients. Monomethylmelamine (MMM) was present in tumor samples from all except one patient. MMM was noted in samples of edematous brain tissue adjacent to tumor from 4 of 8 patients. It was the only PMM metabolite found in brain. TrMM, DMM, and MMM but not PMM, and TeMM were found in tumor cyst fluid from a patient with an intracerebral malignant melanoma. Two patients receiving therapeutic doses of PMM had biopsies taken of subcutaneous malignant melanoma deposits. PMM was undetectable in samples from one patient but reached high concentrations in the other patient. In both patients, MMM was the major metabolite. There was no indication that PMM penetrated into extracerebral tumors more readily than into intracerebral tumors Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were obtained from one patient without neurological toxicity who received low doses of PMM and from 4 patients receiving high doses of PMM who had developed neurological toxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Respective clustering of unfavorable and favorable cytogenetic clones in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia with homozygosity for JAK2(V617F) and response to erythropoietin therapy

BACKGROUND: Patients who have myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) display recurrent, albeit nonspecific cytogenetic abnormalities that are diverse prognostically. For the current study, the authors explored the relation between specific cytogenetic clones and JAK2(V617F) mutational status in patients with MMM and the effects on treatment response to erythropoietin (Epo). METHODS: Concomitantly collected blood granulocytes and bone marrow were processed for JAK2(V617F) mutation analysis and cytogenetic studies, respectively. Genomic DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction, and fluorescent dye chemistry sequencing was performed by using the same primers that were used for amplification. RESULTS: Among 105 study patients, cytogenetic abnormalities were detected in 47 patients (45%), and the JAK2(V617F) mutation was detected in 52 patients (50%). Comparison of mutational frequencies between favorable (normal, sole 13q-, or 20q- clones; n = 70 patients) and unfavorable (all other abnormalities; n = 35 patients) cytogenetic categories revealed a significantly different incidence of homozygous JAK2(V617F) between them (9% vs. 23%, respectively; P = .04). Furthermore, the mutant allele coexisted with several recurrent cytogenetic lesions. Among 25 patients who received Epo either alone (n = 17 patients) or in combination with hydroxyurea (n = 8 patients), 4 patients (16%) achieved a response, and none of them were homozygous for JAK2(V617F). Conversely, a response was more likely (P = .0001) in the presence of favorable cytogenetic abnormalities (i.e., 3 of 4 responders carried sole 13q- or 20q- clones). CONCLUSIONS: Unfavorable and favorable cytogenetic clones in MMM clustered with homozygosity for JAK2(V617F) and treatment response to Epo-based therapy, respectively.     

Elevated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) serum levels in idiopathic myelofibrosis.

An increase of angiogenesis has been shown in idiopathic myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) by microvessel density count method but evaluation of circulating angiogenic factors is still incomplete. In 31 patients affected by MMM and in 12 healthy subjects we evaluated the serum levels of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and correlated VEGF with clinical and laboratory features of disease. We found that MMM patients had circulating VEGF concentrations much higher than controls (Median 1208 ng/ml vs 138 ng/ml, P < 0.0001). No correlation was found between VEGF and Hb, WBC, PLT, LDH, creatinine, bone marrow cellularity, fibrosis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, and therapy. However, in the subgroup of patients with a normal or low VEGF concentration, a direct correlation between VEGF and platelet count (r = 0.90, P = 0.002) was detected. Moreover, patients with a platelet count < 300 x 10(9)/l had VEGF serum levels lower than patients with a higher PLT count (median VEGF 864 vs 1557 pg/ml, P = 0.001). In six patients and in eight controls we also had the opportunity to measure VEGF in the plasma and we calculated that VEGF concentration was much higher in platelet-rich than in platelet-poor plasma and that platetets of MMM patients contained four times more VEGF than those of healthy controls. These results indicate that VEGF is overproduced in MMM, thus confirming an increased angiogenic activity. Platelets are probably a major source of VEGF in MMM but not the only one.