Feeding practices of severely ill intensive care unit patients: an evaluation of energy sources and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE: The quantity of nutrition that is provided to intensive care unit (ICU) patients has recently come under more scrutiny in relation to clinical outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to assess energy intake in severely ill ICU patients and to evaluate the relationship of energy intake with clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS/SETTINGS: Seventy-seven adult surgery and medical ICU patients with length of ICU stay of at least 5 days. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Student's t test and chi2 tests were used to examine ICU populations. To determine the relationship of patient variables to hospital length of stay and ICU, length of stay regression trees were calculated. RESULTS: Both groups were underfed with 50% of goal met in surgical ICU and 56% of goal met in medical ICU. Medical ICU patients received less propofol and significantly less dextrose-containing intravenous fluids when compared to surgical ICU patients (P=0.013). From regression analysis, approaching full nutrient requirements during ICU stay was associated with greater hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay. For combined groups, if % goal was > or =82%, the estimated average value for ICU length of stay was 24 days; whereas, if the % goal was <82%, the average ICU length of stay was 12 days. This relationship held true for hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Medical and surgical ICU patients were insufficiently fed during their ICU stay when compared with registered dietitian recommendations. Medical ICU patients received earlier nutrition support, on average more enteral nutrition, with fewer kilocalories supplied from lipid-based sedatives and intravenous fluid relative to surgical ICU patients. Based upon length of stay, the data suggest that the most severely ill patient may not benefit from delivery of full nutrient needs in the ICU.     

The impact of implementing an enteral tube feeding protocol on caloric and protein delivery in intensive care unit patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an enteral tube feeding protocol on caloric and protein delivery to intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: This prospective study consisted of 2 phases: before and after the implementation on an enteral-feeding protocol. The following data were collected: demographics, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, caloric and protein requirements, the location of the feeding tube tip, and prokinetic agents use. The primary endpoint was caloric and protein intake as a percentage of the requirement. Secondary endpoints were gastric residuals >150 mL, vomiting episodes, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and ICU and hospital mortality. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the control (n = 100) and protocol groups (n = 103) in baseline characteristics. The protocol was associated with significant improvement in the 7-day average of caloric intake/requirement (53.9 +/- 2.3% vs 64.5 +/- 2.2%, p = .001) and protein intake/requirement (56.7 +/- 2.6% vs 67.4% +/- 2.7%, p = .005). Caloric and protein intake improved whether the patient was receiving prokinetic agent or not. There was a trend toward lower gastric residual volumes and vomiting episodes in the protocol group. Patients receiving gastric feeding showed significant improvement in caloric intake to levels comparable to patients with postpyloric feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral tube feeding protocol is effective in improving feeding delivery in ICU patients independent of prokinetic agent use. Protocol for enteral tube feeding should be considered in the management of ICU patients, given the positive impact of this nonpharmacologic, non-interventional tool.     

Fat‐Modified Enteral Formula Improves Feeding Tolerance in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter,Single‐Blind,Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Improvement of fat digestion and absorption was supposed to relieve feeding intolerance. This trial aimed to evaluate the effect of a fat‐modified enteral formula on feeding tolerance in critically ill patients. Materials and Methods: This trial was conducted in 7 hospitals in China. In total, 144 intensive care unit (ICU) patients with estimated need of enteral nutrition (EN) for at least 5 days were randomly given fat‐modified enteral formula containing medium‐chain triglycerides (MCT), carnitine, and taurine (interventional feed group, n = 71) or standard enteral formula (control feed group, n = 73). EN intake, feeding intolerance (diarrhea, vomiting, gastric retention, and abdominal distension) and outcomes (mechanical ventilator‐free days of 28 days, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, and in‐hospital mortality) were collected. Results: Daily calories and protein intake were increased in the interventional feed group compared with the control feed group (P < .01). Total incidence of feeding intolerance was 42.3% in the interventional feed group and 65.7% in the control feed group (P < .001). Daily incidence of feeding intolerance was 11.3%, 18.3%, 14.1%, 25.4%, and 26.1% in the interventional feed group and 31.5%, 32.9%, 34.2%, 34.2%, and 30.4% in the control feed group from study days 1–5 (P = .0083). Incidence of feeding intolerance without abdominal distention was 32.9% in the interventional feed group and 49.3% in the control feed group (P = .047), while the incidence of abdominal distension was 26.8% in the interventional feed group and 43.8% in the control feed group (P = .03). No significant differences existed in outcomes between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The fat‐modified enteral formula containing MCT, carnitine, and taurine may improve feeding tolerance in critically ill patients.     

Calorie Intake of Enteral Nutrition and Clinical Outcomes in Acutely Critically Ill Patients

Background: The appropriate calorie intake to be provided to critically ill patients via enteral nutrition (EN) remains unclear. We performed a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the effect of initial underfeeding and full feeding in acutely critically ill patients. Materials and Methods: We searched the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify randomized controlled trials that compared underfeeding with full feeding in critically ill patients. The primary outcome was overall mortality. The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of pneumonia, Clostridium difficile colitis, other infectious complications, and gastrointestinal intolerance. Results: In total, 4 studies were included in this meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in overall mortality between the underfeeding and full‐feeding groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74–1.19; I² = 26.6%; P = .61). Subgroup analysis of the underfeeding subgroup that was fed ≥33.3% of the standard caloric requirement indicated that overall mortality was significantly lower in this underfeeding subgroup than in the full‐feeding group (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40–1.00; I² = 0%; P = .05). In contrast, no difference in overall mortality was noted between the underfeeding subgroup that was fed <33.3% of the standard caloric requirement and the full‐feeding group. The length of hospital stay and length of ICU stay did not differ between the 2 groups. Moreover, no differences in other secondary clinical outcomes were noted. Conclusions: None of the analyzed clinical outcomes for the acutely critically ill patients were significantly influenced by the calorie intake of the initial EN.     

Gastric vs Small Bowel Feeding in Critically Ill Neurologically Injured Patients

Background: To evaluate gastric compared with small bowel feeding on nutrition and clinical outcomes in critically ill, neurologically injured patients. Materials and Methods: International, prospective observational studies involving 353 intensive care units (ICUs) were included. Eligible patients were critically ill, mechanically ventilated with neurological diagnoses who remained in the ICU and received enteral nutrition (EN) exclusively for at least 3 days. Sites provided data, including patient characteristics, nutrition practices, and 60‐day outcomes. Patients receiving gastric or small bowel feeding were compared. Covariates including age, sex, body mass index, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score were used in the adjusted analyses. Results: Of the 1691 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 1407 (94.1%) received gastric feeding and 88 (5.9%) received small bowel feeding. Adequacy of calories from EN was highest in the gastric group (60.2% and 52.3%, respectively, unadjusted analysis; P = .001), but this was not significant in the adjusted model (P = .428). The likelihood of EN interruptions due to gastrointestinal (GI) complications was higher for the gastric group (19.6% vs 4.7%, unadjusted model; P = .015). There were no significant differences in the rate of discontinuation of mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–1.12; P = .270) or the rate of being discharged alive from the ICU (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.72–1.23; P = .641) and hospital (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.87–1.55; P = .307) after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions: Despite a higher likelihood of EN interruptions due to GI complications, gastric feeding may be associated with better nutrition adequacy, but neither route is associated with better clinical outcomes.     

Tolerance and efficacy of enteral nutrition in traumatic brain-injured patients induced into barbiturate coma

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data evaluating the efficacy of nutrition support in traumatic brain-injured patients induced into barbiturate coma for refractory intracranial hypertension. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of enteral nutrition in a select group of trauma patients. METHODS: Prospective data were collected on severe traumatic brain-injured patients over a 4-year period. Patients were stratified by whether or not they were induced into a barbiturate coma. Barbiturate coma was defined as per American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) guidelines. All patients were initially fed via the enteral route via a nasogastric feeding tube. Patients who did not tolerate feedings within 48 hours started receiving prokinetic agents. Feeding tolerance was defined as ability to tolerate enteral feedings with <150 mL of gastric residuals every 6 hours for >72 hours. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were induced into a barbiturate coma. All were victims of blunt-force trauma. Forty-two of 57 (74%) patients were men, with a mean age of 37+/-12 years and a mean injury severity score of 24+/-10. Thirty-eight of the 57 (67%) patients had an isolated traumatic brain injury. All 57 patients failed enteral nutrition via the nasogastric route after the first 48 hours of nutrition initiation after barbiturate coma was fully achieved by protocol criteria. Prokinetic agents demonstrated no improvement in feeding tolerance after the subsequent 48-72 hours. Of the 12 patients who had a postpyloric feeding tube placed, only 25% tolerated enteral nutrition for >48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with traumatic brain injury induced into barbiturate coma develop a significant ileus that is refractory to prokinetic agents. Only a marginal improvement is seen when the postpyloric route is obtained. Early parenteral nutrition should be considered in this patient population.     

Early jejunal feeding initiation and clinical outcomes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis

Background: Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition reduces infectious complications and mortality in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). This study used clinical outcomes to investigate the association between time to initiation of distal jejunal feeding (DJF) and time to achievement of goal enteral feeding with clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with SAP admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) during a 1‐year period. Collected data included demographic information, body mass index (BMI; kg/m²), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores at admission, time of onset of DJF, time to goal feeding, ICU length of stay, and mortality. Results: Time to starting DJF was longer in nonsurvivors (n = 4) than in survivors (n = 12) (17 vs 7 days, P < .05). All nonsurvivors had BMI >30 kg/m² (50% had BMI > 50 kg/m²). ICU length of stay was significantly associated with achievement of goal feeding. Three patients never reached goal feeding and spent 45.3 ± 19.6 days in the ICU; 7 patients reached goal feeding within 3 days of initiating DJF and spent 18 ± 1.7 days in the ICU; and 4 patients reached goal feeding within 3 days and spent 10.5 ± 3.5 days in the ICU. APACHE II scores were not significantly different among the 3 groups (16.7 ± 1.5, 12 ± 0.7, and 16.2 ± 1.2, respectively, P > .05). Conclusions: Early initiation of DJF in the ICU was associated with reduced mortality in this cohort of patients with SAP. Early achievement of jejunal feeding goal early was associated with a shorter ICU length of stay, irrespective of the severity of SAP.     

Vitamin B6 intakes and status of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE: To assess vitamin B6 intake and status of critically ill patients. The relationship between vitamin B6 status indicators and the severity of illness and outcome in these patients was also examined. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: The study was performed at the Taichung Veteran General Hospital, in the central part of Taiwan. SUBJECTS: Ninety-four patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) entered the study and 46 patients successfully completed this study. INTERVENTIONS: No intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vitamin B6 intake was recorded for 14 days. Vitamin B6 status was assessed by direct measures (plasma pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP), pyridoxal (PL), and urinary 4-pyridoxic acid (4-PA)) and indirect measures (erythrocyte alanine (EALT-AC) and aspartate (EAST-AC) aminotransaminase activity coefficient). The severity of illness (APACHE II score), the length of ventilation dependency, and the length of ICU and hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: Patients had an adequate mean vitamin B6 intake (16.26+/-19.39 mg) during the 14 day study. Mean vitamin B6 intake was significantly higher on day 14 than on day 1 (P<0.001). However, plasma PLP and PL concentrations significantly decreased at the 14th day after admission (P<0.05). Erythrocyte alanine aminotransaminase activity coefficient and EAST-AC did not change significantly. Urinary 4-PA significantly increased at the 14th day (P<0.001). No significant relationships were found between APACHE II scores and clinical outcomes (the length of ICU and hospital stay, the length of ventilation dependency) of patients, vitamin B6 intake or status indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill patients received nutritional support in the ICU, and had sufficient mean vitamin B6 intake and adequate vitamin B6 status. Therefore, the severity of illness and the results should not be affected by vitamin B6 status. However, we have noted that plasma PLP and PL concentrations significantly decreased while vitamin B6 intake significantly increased on day 14. Critical clinical conditions and complex metabolism in the critically ill may account for the reduction of plasma PLP and PL. Since vitamin B6 deficiency causes profound effects on immune system function, dietary or supplemented vitamin B6 intake is suggested for hospitalized patients.     

The evolving role of post-ligament of Trietz nasojejunal feeding in enteral nutrition and the need for improved feeding tube design and placement methods

Nutrition support is an important link in the chain of therapy for intensive care unit patients. The early institution of nutrition support significantly reduces the incidence of septic complications, reduces mortality, and shortens hospital stay. Unfortunately, impaired gastrointestinal function, particularly gastric atony, restricts the use of nasogastric enteral tube feeding, and the use of this route of administration in these patients can lead to regurgitation, aspiration, and the development of pneumonia. Postpyloric enteral feeding was heralded as a means of overcoming many of these problems. Overall, the results of controlled studies do not support a role of postpyloric duodenal feeding in reducing the incidence of aspiration pneumonia. As a consequence, post-ligament of Treitz nasojejunal enteral feeding is proposed as the technique of choice in these patients. Feeding tube design must incorporate a gastric aspiration port to overcome problems of gastroesophageal acid reflux, duodenogastric bile reflux, and increased gastric acid secretion, problems that occur during "downstream" jejunal feeding. Tube placement technique will need to be refined and patients will need to receive a predigested enteral diet. In postoperative surgical patients in the intensive care unit, there is also a need for a newly designed dual-purpose nasogastric tube capable initially of providing a means of undertaking gastric aspiration and decompression and subsequently a means of initiating nasogastric enteral feeding.     

Dual‐Purpose Gastric Decompression and Enteral Feeding Tubes Rationale and Design of Novel Nasogastric and Nasogastrojejunal Tubes

Background: The importance of early postoperative nutrition in surgical patients and early institution of enteral nutrition in intensive care unit (ICU) patients have recently been highlighted. Unfortunately, institution of enteral feeding in both groups of patients often has to be postponed due to delayed gastric emptying and the need for gastric decompression. The design of current polyvinylchloride (PVC) gastric decompression tubes (Salem Sump [Covidien, Mansfield, MA] in the United States; Ryles [Penine Health Care Ltd, Derby, UK] in the United Kingdom and Europe) make them unsuitable for their subsequent use as either nasogastric enteral feeding tubes or for continued gastric decompression during postpyloric enteral feeding. To overcome these problems, we have designed a range of polyurethane (PU) dual‐purpose gastric decompression and enteral feeding tubes that include 2 nasogastric tubes (double lumen to replace Salem Sump; single lumen to replace Ryles). Two novel multilumen nasogastrojejunal tubes (triple lumen for the United States; double lumen for the United Kingdom and Europe) complete the range. By using PU, a given internal diameter (ID) and flow area can be incorporated into a lower outside diameter (OD) compared with that achieved with PVC. The ID and lumen and flow area of an 18Fr (OD 6.7 mm) PVC Salem Sump can be incorporated into a 14Fr (OD 4.7 mm) PU tube. The design of aspiration/infusion ports of current PVC and PU tubes invites occlusion by gastrointestinal mucosa and clogging by mucus and enteral feed. To overcome this, we have designed long, single, widened, smooth, and curved edge ports with no “dead space” to trap mucus or curdled diet. Involving up to 214° of the circumference, these ports have up to 11 times the flow areas of the aspiration ports of current PVC tubes. Conclusion: The proposed designs will lead to the development of dual‐purpose nasogastric and nasojejunal tubes that will significantly improve the clinical and nutrition care of postoperative and ICU patients.     

What are the factors that influence the attainment of satisfactory energy intake in pediatric intensive care unit patients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition?

ObjectiveChildren admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk of inadequate energy intake. Although studies have identified factors contributing to an inadequate energy supply in critically ill children, they did not take into consideration the length of time during which patients received their estimated energy requirements after having achieved a satisfactory energy intake. This study aimed to identify factors associated with the non-attainment of estimated energy requirements and consider the time this energy intake is maintained.MethodsThis was a prospective study involving 207 children hospitalized in the ICU who were receiving enteral and/or parenteral nutrition. The outcome variable studied was whether 90% of the estimated basal metabolic rate was maintained for at least half of the ICU stay (satisfactory energy intake). The exposure variables for outcome were gender, age, diagnosis, use of vasopressors, malnutrition, route of nutritional support, and Pediatric Index of Mortality and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction scores.ResultsSatisfactory energy intake was attained by 20.8% of the patients, within a mean time of 5.07 ± 2.48 d. In a multivariable analysis, a diagnosis of heart disease (odds ratio 3.62, 95% confidence interval 1.03–12.68, P = 0.045) increased the risk of insufficient energy intake, whereas malnutrition (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.20–0.92, P = 0.030) and the use of parenteral nutrition (odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.15–0.77, P = 0.001) were protective factors against this outcome.ConclusionA satisfactory energy intake was reached by a small proportion of patients during their ICU stay. Heart disease was an independent risk factor for the non-attainment of satisfactory energy intake, whereas malnutrition and the use of parenteral nutrition were protective factors against this outcome.     

The use of pre- pro- and synbiotics in adult intensive care unit patients: systematic review

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This review investigated whether the administration of enteral pre-, pro- and synbiotics compared with controls in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients reduced the incidence of nosocomial infections, length of ICU stay, hospital mortality and specifically pneumonia. METHODS: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing enteral feeding and pre-, pro- or synbiotics, versus standard enteral feed alone, in patients admitted to adult ICUs. RESULTS: Eight randomised studies with a total of 999 critically ill adult patients met the inclusion criteria. Pre- pro- or synbiotics were not associated with any significant change in the outcomes studied-length of ICU stay, hospital mortality and the incidence of nosocomial infection and more specifically pneumonia incidence. Few data were available for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pre- pro- or synbiotics in adult critically ill patients confers no statistically significant benefit in the outcome criteria studied. There is currently a lack of evidence to support the use of pre- pro- or synbiotics in patients admitted to adult ICUs, and a large well-designed trial is needed in this area.     

Pharmaconutrition

Background: Enteral supply of ω‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids has been used in an attempt to modulate inflammation and improve outcome in critically ill patients. However, enteral administration may be slow to change membrane composition and therefore may not be the best route to supply these fatty acids in patients with acute conditions. This study evaluated the effects of short‐term intravenous (IV) administration of fish oil–based lipid emulsion (FLE) as pharmaconutrition on cytokine levels in critically ill elderly patients. Methods: Enterally fed patients (n = 40; aged 60–80 years) were recruited in the first 48 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Fifteen patients received IV FLE (0.2 g/kg body weight) over 6 hours for 3 consecutive days, and 25 patients did not receive IV lipid (control). Samples were collected before and 24 hours and 72 hours after the third FLE infusion. Nutrient intakes, clinical parameters, and serum cytokine concentrations were measured. Results: Compared with the control, FLE resulted in higher energy intake, lower serum tumor necrosis factor–α and interleukin (IL)–8 concentrations, and higher serum IL‐10. These differences occurred around 7–9 days of ICU stay at the time of the patient's extubation. ICU stay, mortality, and markers of coagulation and liver function did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Short‐term IV FLE modulates some inflammatory markers in critically ill elderly patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN), suggesting an anti‐inflammatory effect. This may be a benefit and suggests a role for FLE administration as a supplement in elderly ICU patients receiving standard EN.     

Prevalence,Risk Factors,Clinical Consequences,and Treatment of Enteral Feed Intolerance During Critical Illness

Background: We aimed to determine the incidence of enteral feed intolerance and factors associated with intolerance and to assess the influence of intolerance on nutrition and clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from an international observational cohort study of nutrition practices among 167 intensive care units (ICUs). Data were collected on nutrition adequacy, ventilator‐free days (VFDs), ICU stay, and 60‐day mortality. Intolerance was defined as interruption of enteral nutrition (EN) due to gastrointestinal (GI) reasons (large gastric residuals, abdominal distension, emesis, diarrhea, or subjective discomfort). Logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for intolerance and their clinical significance. A sensitivity analysis restricted to sites specifying a gastric residual volume ≥200 mL to identify intolerance was also conducted. Results: Data from 1,888 ICU patients were included. The incidence of intolerance was 30.5% and occurred after a median 3 days from EN initiation. Patients remained intolerant for a mean (±SD) duration of 1.9 ± 1.3 days . Intolerance was associated with worse nutrition adequacy vs the tolerant (56% vs 64%, P < .0001), fewer VFDs (2.5 vs 11.2, P < .0001), increased ICU stay (14.4 vs 11.3 days, P < .0001), and increased mortality (30.8% vs 26.2, P = .04). The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that intolerance remained associated with negative outcomes. Although mortality was greater among the intolerant patients, this was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Intolerance occurs frequently during EN in critically ill patients and is associated with poorer nutrition and clinical outcomes.     

Quand et comment nourrir l'intestin agressé ?

Nutritional support with enteral nutrition in intensive care patients is highly desirable for many reasons, but it is often difficult to realise. Critically ill patients suffer pylorus closure and reduced peristaltism due to mechanical ventilation and use of drugs like opiates, sedatives and catecholamines. Feeding through nasogastric tubes is the simplest technique. In case of failure, defined as persistent gastric residues > 300 mL or negative energy balances (delivering less than 75% of energy target for > 3 days), postpyloric feeding should be introduced. Daily energy delivery should be closely monitored to avoid progressive large negative energy balances: indeed, enteral nutrition is frequently interrupted in ICU patients for various therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Combined enteral and parenteral nutrition can avoid the dire consequence of deficient energy intakes. Enteral nutrition may be initiated early in most categories of medical and surgical patients: the clinical benefits of this approach have been demonstrated in trauma and burn patients, but not yet in other diagnostic categories. In most patients, especially in the more stable patients, nutritional support may be introduced between 3 and 5 days post-admission. In the ICU, delivery is best performed with the continuous pump-controlled infusion technique. To be successful, nutrition must become a routine, supported by structured protocols.     

Full versus Trophic Feeds in Critically Ill Adults with High and Low Nutritional Risk Scores: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Although energy intake might be associated with clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, it remains unclear whether full or trophic feeding is suitable for critically ill patients with high or low nutrition risk. We conducted a prospective study to determine which feeding energy intakes were associated with clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with high or low nutrition risk. This was an investigator-initiated, single center, single blind, randomized controlled trial. Critically ill patients were allocated to either high or low nutrition risk based on their Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill score, and then randomized to receive either the full or the trophic feeding. The feeding procedure was administered for six days. No significant differences were observed in hospital, 14-day and 28-day mortalities, the length of ventilator dependency, or ICU and hospital stay among the four groups. There were no associations between energy and protein intakes and hospital, 14-day and 28-day mortalities in any of the four groups. However, protein intake was positively associated with the length of hospital stay and ventilator dependency in patients with low nutrition risk receiving trophic feeding. Full or trophic feeding in critically ill patients showed no associations with clinical outcomes, regardless of nutrition risk.     

Evaluation of Nutrition Deficits in Adult and Elderly Trauma Patients

Background: As metabolism is often escalated following injury, severely injured trauma patients are at risk for underfeeding and adverse outcomes. Methods: From an international database of 12,573 critically ill, adult mechanically ventilated patients, who received a minimum of 3 days of nutrition therapy, trauma patients were identified and nutrition practices and outcomes compared with nontrauma patients. Within the trauma population, we compared nutrition practices and outcomes of younger vs older patients. Results: There were 1279 (10.2%) trauma patients. They were younger, were predominantly male, had lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, and had an overall lower body mass index compared with nontrauma patients. Eighty percent of trauma patients received enteral feeding compared with 78% of nontrauma patients. Trauma patients were prescribed more calories and protein yet received similar amounts as nontrauma patients. Nutrition adequacy was reduced in both trauma and nontrauma patients. Survival was higher in trauma patients (86.6%) compared with nontrauma patients (71.8%). When patients who died were included as never discharged, trauma patients were more rapidly discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital. Within the trauma population, 17.5% were elderly (≥65 years). The elderly had increased days of ventilation, ICU stay, and mortality compared with younger trauma patients. In a multivariable model, age and APACHE II score, but not nutrition adequacy, were associated with time to discharge alive from the hospital. Conclusion: Significant nutrition deficits were noted in all patients. Elderly trauma patients have worse outcomes compared with younger patients. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether increased nutrition intake can improve the outcomes of trauma patients, especially geriatric trauma patients.