Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer at a specialty center

PURPOSE: Although sphincter-preservation procedures have replaced abdominoperineal resection as the treatment of choice for rectal cancer, a subset of patients with rectal cancer will still require abdominoperineal resection. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy has been shown to reduce local recurrence, and combined modality therapy (chemoradiation) improves survival. Sharp mesorectal excision compared with the classic teaching of blunt retrorectal dissection is also an important component of local control. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the postoperative complications associated with neoadjuvant therapy in patients requiring complete rectal excision. Oncologic outcomes for all patients with abdominoperineal resection are also provided. METHODS: A prospective database of 5,634 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between the years 1987 and 1997 was reviewed. Patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum who underwent abdominoperineal resection were identified. In 1,622 patients who were operated on for primary rectal cancer, 292 patients (18 percent) underwent abdominoperineal resection and the rest had a sphincter-preserving procedure. Ten patients were excluded from the study because of prior pelvic irradiation for other cancer (8 patients) and insufficient radiation dose (<4,000 cGy; 2 patients). Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was given to 123 patients and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy to 65 patients, whereas 94 did not receive radiotherapy. Intraoperative radiotherapy combined with preoperative radiotherapy was administered to 23 of the 123 patients given neoadjuvant radiotherapy. RESULTS: The duration of the operation was significantly longer in both neoadjuvant radiotherapy and intraoperative radiotherapy groups compared with the nonradiotherapy group (P = 0.01 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Estimated blood loss, mean number of blood units transfused per patient, and the percentage of patients being transfused were similar among the groups. Early postoperative complications were significantly higher in the neoadjuvant radiotherapy groups compared with the nonradiotherapy group. Late complications, overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence were not significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer of the lower one-third of the rectum, sharp pelvic dissection can result in a low rate of local recurrence even without radiotherapy. The role of preoperative radiotherapy, although associated with higher perineal wound complications, is important in increasing resectability and sphincter-preservation rate. Randomized, prospective trials will be needed to establish the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients undergoing sharp mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.     

Adjuvante und neoadjuvante therapie des rektumkarzinoms

The Consensus Conference of the German Cancer Society (CAO/AIO/ARO, 1.7. 1998) has recently updated recommendations for patients with rectal cancer. Instead of a former reservation regarding the indication of adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer the actual version of the consensus particularly emphasizes the tole of postoperative radiochemotherapy for stage-II/III tumors. This article reviews the most recent and ongoing trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer. To avoid local recurrence is the most important aspect in the primary treatment of rectal cancer. In some series, e. g. the results of the Surgical Department of the University of Erlangen, a significant correlation between local control and survival was noted. The final results of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial with 1168 randomized patients not only confirmed the potential of radiotherapy to reduce local recurrence-rate, but also demonstrated a significant survival advantage for patients receiving short-course preoperative radiation therapy. Postoperative combination therapy is usual in the United States and in most European countries since the publication of two randomized trials of the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) and the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG). The survival advantage resulting from an adjuvant radiotherapy with conventional doses and concurrent fluorouracil-based chemotherapy as compared to surgery alone was recently confirmed in a Norwegian trial. Protracted venous 5-fluorouracil infusion should further improve treatment results. Numerous phase-ll studies have demonstrated the efficacy of preoperative radiochemotherapy with high rates of pathological response. Thus, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is recommended for patients with locally advanced tumor primarily not amenable to curative surgery. Prospective randomized trials are ongoing to clarify the tole of preoperative versus postoperative combined treatment for patients with resectable rectal cancer. Radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer is recommended as standard treatment outside clinical trials for Stage II/III patients after curative treatment and for patients with T4-tumor prior to surgery. The optimal use of chemotherapy and the sequence of treatment modalities remains to be elucidated.     

Role of Radiotherapy With Surgery for T3 and Resectable T4 Rectal Cancer: Evidence From Randomized Trials

Purpose The main treatment for resectable rectal cancer T2–T4 N0–N2 M0 is surgery. The benefit of preoperative or postoperative radiation therapy can be analyzed in terms of improvement of local control, sphincter preservation, and survival weighted against increased toxicity. Methods Only randomized trials can provide strong evidence of a positive cost-benefit ratio of such combined approach. The most recent trials were reviewed. Results Three randomized trials, including the latest German CAO-ARO trial, have demonstrated the superiority of preoperative radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (vs. postoperative) in terms of local control and toxicity. The Ducth TME trial showed that even with modern standard surgery, preoperative radiotherapy improved local control. Preoperative irradiation using a high dose in a small volume and a long interval before surgery may improve sphincter preservation (Lyon trials). Concurrent chemoradiation (FFCD 9203, EORTC 22921, did not significantly improve sphincter preservation or survival but significantly reduced the local recurrence rate. Conclusions In 2005 examination of randomized trials provides evidence for the benefit of preoperative chemoradiation in improving local control and probably sphincter preservation in rectal cancer. Randomized trials should be designed to further demonstrate improved sphincter preservation and to increase survival using adjuvant medical treatments.     

Selective use of adjuvant radiation therapy in resectable colorectal adenocarcinoma

Colorectal cancer recurs within the operative field in 10–20 per cent of patients undergoing potentially curative surgery. In certain subgroups, the recurrence rate is 20–50 per cent. There are some data to suggest either preoperative or postoperative radiation therapy as an adjuvant to potentially curative surgery can reduce the local operative failure rate. However, since radiation therapy has significant side effects, patient selection to maximize the therapeutic ratio is important. This report defines the criteria at the Massachusetts General Hospital for selection of patients with colorectal cancer for adjuvant radiation therapy, defines radiation therapy-surgery sequencing alternatives used, and deseribes techniques to reduce radiation side effects. Over a period of three and a half years, 196 patients received adjuvant radiation therapy: 51 patients received either moderate or low dose preoperative radiation therapy to rectal or rectosigmoid cancers, and 161 patients received postoperative radiation therapy to the pelvis or extrapelvic colonic tumor-lymph node beds. Some patients who received low-dose preoperative radiation therapy also received moderate-dose postoperative radiation therapy. We prefer moderate-dose postoperative radiation therapy as the approach most likely to decrease the local recurrence rate with minimal interference with surgical procedures and late small-bowel complications. Patients who received postoperative radiation therapy were those without distant metastases, whose primary tumor pathology revealed macroscopic or extensive microscopic transmural tumor penetration into extraperitoneal tissues. Careful case selection, multiple field techniques, the use of reperitonealization, omental flaps, and retroversion of the uterus into the pelvis were combined with postoperative small-bowel x-rays, bladder distention, and lateral portals to minimize radiation damage to normal structures.     

p53, Deleted in Colorectal Cancer Gene,and Thymidylate Synthase as Predictors of Histopathologic Response and Survival in Low,Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Preoperative Adjuvant Therapy

PURPOSE: Adjuvant therapy, either preoperatively or postoperatively, and modifications of surgery have been used to try to improve outcome of surgery for rectal cancer in regard to both local recurrence and survival. Assessment of prognosis in patients after resection is currently primarily based on clinicopathologic factors. These predict the subsequent behavior of the tumor only imperfectly. The aim of this study was to evaluate three potential molecular genetic markers of prognosis (p53, deleted in colorectal cancer gene, and thymidylate synthase) in Dukes Stage B and C low rectal tumors treated with adjuvant therapy and to determine whether they correlate with survival, local recurrence, or the pathologic response to adjuvant therapy (assessed by extent of tumor regression and tumor down-staging). METHODS: Sixty locally advanced low rectal tumors resected after preoperative chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone were studied by immunohistochemical staining for p53, deleted in colorectal cancer gene, and thymidylate synthase. In addition, p53 gene mutations were sought by polymerase chain reaction–single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. These results were correlated with survival, local recurrence, and pathologic response to adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Lack of thymidylate synthase staining by immunohistochemistry was associated with tumor down-staging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy but not after radiotherapy or for these two combined groups. There was no correlation between p53, deleted in colorectal cancer gene, or thymidylate synthase immunohistochemical staining or between p53 polymerase chain reaction–single-strand conformation polymorphism and local recurrence or survival in locally advanced low rectal cancers treated with preoperative adjuvant therapies. CONCLUSION: Prediction of prognosis in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancers treated with preoperative adjuvant therapies continues to be problematic. Thymidylate synthase immunohistochemistry appears to be the most promising factor of those assessed in predicting tumor down-staging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced low rectal cancers.     

Randomized trials of adjuvant radiation therapy for rectal carcinoma: A review

An estimated 44,000 cases of rectal carcinoma arise annually in the United States. The traditional management of this disease has been surgery alone, but advances in adjuvant therapy offer potential for improvement of local control, disease-free survival, and survival. In the last two decades, many multicenter randomized trials of adjuvant preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy for rectal carcinoma have been reported. The design and results of these trials are critically reviewed. Results from preoperative trials have been conflicting, reflecting the heterogeneity of the trial designs. Large postoperative adjuvant trials have been reported recently. The combined analysis of local recurrence data from the mature, published trials indicates that radiation therapy results in improved local control (P=0.02), an important concern in rectal carcinoma as local recurrences present vexing and painful clinical problems often refractory to conventional management. These trials also have shown that radiation therapy can contribute to improved survival in the combined modality setting. Improvements in the clinical outcome of rectal cancer should be possible with appropriate adjuvant therapy. The success of combined modality adjuvant therapy for rectal carcinoma may serve as a model to aid in the design of therapeutic regimens for other solid tumors.     

Update on advances and controversy in rectal cancer treatment

Changes in the multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer have been recently proposed. We performed a comprehensive review of the current data on neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, focussing on chemoradiotherapy treatment and timing of surgery. Six components were proposed as the framework for the treatment of rectal cancer: neoadjuvant therapy and changing patterns in patient selection, long- or short-course radiotherapy, adverse effects of radiotherapy, timing of surgery, non-operative management of rectal cancer and postoperative adjuvant therapy. Lack of a consistent difference in terms of local recurrence has been observed between short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy. Indications for preoperative radiotherapy have been reconsidered in the last years. An interval of 10–11 weeks seemed to be the optimal timing, with no impact on patient safety. Since assessment criteria of clinical complete response are not well defined, and the basis for non-operative management of rectal cancer is still not clear, further investigations are required. There is controversy about standard treatments for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer that are being analyzed by ongoing studies. Tailored treatments could avoid over-treatment for a large number of patients without any impairment of the oncologic results.     

Extensive surgery after high-dose preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE: This was a pilot study of high-dose preoperative concurrent radiation and chemotherapy before extensive surgery in patients with locally advanced recurrent rectal cancer. Here we report on curative resectability, acute toxicities during chemoradiotherapy, surgical complications, local control, and three-year survival rates achieved with this aggressive multimodal regimen. METHODS: Between 1994 and 1997, 35 previously nonirradiated patients with pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer were entered in the study. All patients presented with tumor contiguous or adherent to adjacent pelvic organs and were not deemed amenable to primary curative surgery. A total radiation dose of 50.4 Gy with a small-volume boost of 5.4 to 9 Gy was delivered in conventional fractionation (single dose, 1.8 Gy). 5-Fluorouracil was scheduled as a continuous infusion of 1,000 mg/m²/day on Days 1 to 5 and 29 to 33. Six weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients were reassessed for resectability, and radical surgery was attempted whenever feasible. RESULTS: After preoperative chemoradiotherapy 28 of 35 patients (80 percent) underwent resection with curative intent. In 16 of 35 patients (57 percent) extended resection of adjacent organs was performed. Resections with negative margins were achieved in 17 patients (61 percent); 9 patients had microscopic, and 2 patients had gross residual disease. There was no postoperative mortality. Fourteen patients (44 percent) experienced postoperative complications. Toxicity from chemoradiotherapy occurred mainly as diarrhea (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3; 23 percent), dermatitis (Grade 3; 11 percent), and leucopenia (Grade 3; 11 percent). One patient died of tumortoxic multiple organ failure during chemoradiotherapy. With a median follow-up of 27 months, local re-recurrence after curative resection was observed in only three patients (18 percent); six patients developed distant metastases. Three-year actuarial survival rate was significantly improved after complete resection (82 percent) as compared with noncurative surgery (38 percent;P=0.03). CONCLUSION: A combination of high-dose preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by extended surgery can achieve clear resection margins in more than 60 percent of patients with recurrent rectal tumor not amenable to primary surgery. An encouraging trend evolved for this multimodal treatment to improve long-term local control and survival rate.Presented at the meeting of the German Society for Radiation Oncology, Radiation Biology and Medical Physics (DEGRO), Nürnberg, Germany, November 7 to 10, 1998.     

Local excision of rectal cancer: what is the evidence?

PURPOSE: Although local excision of rectal cancers is a less morbid alternative to radical resection, its role as a curative procedure is unclear. The role of adjuvant therapy after local excision is also controversial. This review aims to examine current evidence on local excision of rectal cancers and how it fits into the management algorithm for rectal cancer. METHODS: A literature review was undertaken through the MEDLINE database and by cross-referencing previous publications, thus identifying 41 studies on curative local excision of rectal cancer published in English. Details of preoperative staging, surgical procedures, adjuvant therapy, follow-up, and outcome measures, including complications, survival data, recurrences, and salvage were examined. RESULTS: Preoperative staging of rectal cancers is variable. Digital rectal examination and computerized tomography are used in most studies. Endorectal ultrasound is used in some patients in 9 of 41 studies. Local excision preserves anorectal function, and seems to have limited morbidity (0-22 percent). Local excision alone is associated with local recurrences in 9.7 (range, 0-24) percent of T1, 25 (range, 0-67) percent of T2 and 38 (range, 0-100) percent of T3 cancers. The addition of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after local excision yields local recurrence rates of 9.5 (range, 0-50) percent for T1, 13.6 (range, 0-24) percent for T2, and 13.8 (range, 0-50) percent for T3 cancers. Data on local excision after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for tumor down staging are limited. Factors other than T-stage that lead to higher local recurrence rates after local excision include poor histologic grade, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, and positive margins. Local recurrences after local excision can be surgically salvaged (84 of 114 patients in 15 studies), with a disease-free survival rates between 40 and 100 percent at a follow-up of 0.1 to 13.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Local excision for rectal cancers is associated with a low morbidity and provides satisfactory local control and disease-free survival rates for T1 rectal cancers. There is, however, a need for a randomized, controlled trial for T2 cancers, comparing local excision with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to radical resection.     

Current issues in locally advanced colorectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy

In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer,preoperative chemoradiotherapy has proven to significantly improve local control and cause lower treatmentrelated toxicity compared with postoperative adjuvant treatment.Preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision or tumor specific mesorectal excision has evolved as the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer.The paradigm shift from postoperative to preoperative therapy has raised a series of concerns however that have practical clinical implications.These include the method used to predict patients who will show good response,sphincter preservation,the application of conservative management such as local excision or"wait-and-watch"in patients obtaining a good response following preoperative chemoradiotherapy,and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy.This review addresses these current issues in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy.     

Radiation therapy for rectal cancer]

The current conventional treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer with stage II or III is surgery following or followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT), which improved local control and overall survival when compared with surgery alone. Recently, a prospective randomized study with a large sample size and long-term follow-up reported that preoperative CRT resulted in improved local control and sphincter preservation, reduced toxicities, and comparative overall survival when compared with postoperative CRT. However, diagnostic imaging for accurate stage should be applied. In addition, chemotherapeutic regimen, schedule for radiation therapy, and timing of surgery should be also optimized in order to maximize the effect of preoperative CRT.     

Adjuvant Radiation for Rectal Cancer: Do We Measure Up to the Standard of Care? An Epidemiologic Analysis of Trends Over 25 Years in the United States

PURPOSE In the United States, adjuvant radiation therapy is currently recommended for most patients with rectal cancer. We conducted this population-based study to evaluate the rate of radiation therapy and the factors affecting its delivery.METHODS We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database to assess treatment of patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer diagnosed over a 25-year period (1976 through 2000). We evaluated the rate of radiation therapy use and its timing (preoperative vs. postoperative) and the influence of factors such as tumor stage and grade; patient gender and race; and geographic location.RESULTS In this 25-year period, 45,627 patients met our selection criteria. The rate of radiation therapy use increased dramatically over time: from 17 percent of advanced-stage patients in 1976 to 65 percent in 2000 (P < 0.0001). Until 1996, the increase was due almost entirely to postoperative radiation therapy. Since 1996, the rate of preoperative radiation therapy use has increased (P < 0.0001) and the rate of postoperative radiation therapy use has begun to decline. We found, after controlling for the year of diagnosis, that female patients, African Americans, older patients, and patients with low-grade lesions were less likely to undergo radiation therapy (P < 0.0001). Geographic location was also an important predictor of radiation therapy use.CONCLUSIONS The use of radiation therapy for patients with rectal cancer has dramatically increased over the 25-year period studied, with a recent shift to the use of preoperative radiation therapy; however, in 2000, over 30 percent of patients with advanced-stage nonmetastatic rectal cancer did not undergo radiation therapy. Given the variation in radiation therapy use that we found to be due to demographic factors, access to adjuvant radiation therapy can be improved.Supported in part by the University of Minnesota Cancer Center.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Dallas, Texas, May 8 to 13, 2004.Reprints are not available.     

Neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal carcinoma

Rectal cancer is one of the most common neoplasms of Western Countries. Overall mortality at 5 years is about 40%. This cancer is commonly diagnosed at a precocious stage, but because of local relapse and/or metastatic disease, only half of radically resected patients can be considered disease free. The value of adding radiotherapy to surgery in the treatment of patients with resectable rectal cancer has been assessed in trials using either preoperative or postoperative irradiation. Preoperative irradiation is more "dose-effective" than postoperative radiotherapy; that is, a higher dose is needed postoperatively to reduce rates of local recurrence to the same extent as preoperative radiation. Nevertheless, preoperative treatment has not been routinely recommended, mainly because it has not been shown to improve overall survival and because in some trials it has been associated with increased postoperative mortality. This paper critically reviews clinical trials of chemoradiotherapy on whether an optimal combination exists for locally advanced rectal cancer. Even if in the latest years, recent advances in surgery have improved the local control of disease, the next steps in rectal cancer care should aim at the improvement of local cure rates and the enhancement of systemic control. New approaches to CT treatment are necessary. Patient enrollment into rigorous and well-conducted clinical trials will generate new information regarding investigational therapies and it will offer improved therapies for patients with this disease.     

Implications of recent neoadjuvant clinical trials on the future practice of radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Over the last two decades, the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer(LARC) has been neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus total mesorectal excision followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Total neoadjuvant treatment(TNT) and immunotherapy are two major issues in the treatment of LARC. In the two latest phase Ⅲ randomized controlled trials(RAPIDO and PRODIGE23), the TNT approach achieved higher rates of pathologic complete response and distant metastasis-free survival than conventional ch...     

Neoadjuvante und adjuvante Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms

The therapy of rectal cancer could be improved in recent years by advances in the areas of preoperative diagnostics, surgery and pathology. In this review we would like to present in particular the developments in the areas of chemotherapy and radiotherapy which have substantially contributed to improvements in the local recurrence rates of rectal cancer. The advantages and disadvantages of preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy will be discussed and possible further developments in multimodal therapy of rectal cancer will be presented.     

Surgical adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: Present options

Recent advances have been made with the publication of the results of GITSG and NCCTG trials, which demonstrated the significant improvement of survival by combined postoperative radiochemotherapy protocols for Stage II and III rectal cancer. These data show that systemic chemotherapy has a decisive role to play in this policy. Some of the advantages of preoperative irradiation compared with postoperative radiation therapy consist of the improvement of resectability of T4 tumors and the anal preservation for low-lying cancers. These data suggest that preoperative chemoradiotherapy should be applied not only to T4 tumors but also to all T3 tumors even when the transrectal extension is limited. The most usual protocol combines 5-fluorouracil (300–350 mg/m²/day) and leucovorin (20 mg/m₂/day) for 5 days, followed by radiation therapy (30–35 Gy in 10 fractions within 12–15 days), with surgery taking place 4 to 8 weeks later, after the tumor has been restaged. Systemic therapy is continued for four more months. T2 cancers should not be excluded from the benefit of preoperative irradiation.     

Adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer

In recent years, adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer has advanced considerably. This article reviews these advances and provides an update of the most recent and ongoing trials. In 1990, adjuvant therapy became the “standard of care” for patients with Stage III colon cancer (Dukes C) in the United States. Recent clinical trial data indicate that adjuvant treatment may also be effective in patients with Stage II (Dukes B₂) colon cancer. The combination of 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin may slightly improve survival (5–10 percent) compared with the standard 5-fluorouracil plus levamisole combination. The three-drug regimen (5-fluorouracil plus levamisole plus leucovorin) is more toxic, with no superior effect on survival. Intraportal chemotherapy, although it may significantly improve patient survival, does not decrease the frequency of liver metastases. However, it is still a promising form of adjuvant therapy owing to its short treatment period and relatively equivalent effects in survival compared with that of systemic therapy. For patients with Stage II or Stage III rectal cancer, postoperative systemic 5-fluorouracil plus radiation therapy plus protracted venous 5-fluorouracil infusion is the most effective postoperative adjuvant regimen. However, results from several studies show that preoperative radiation alone or chemoradiation for advanced local rectal cancers might also be effective while also improving resectability, decreasing morbidity, and increasing the chance that a sphincter-sparing procedure may be performed. The role of leucovorin in rectal cancer remains to be determined. Immune therapies with agents such as interferon-α-2a, monoclonal antibody 17-1A, and autologous tumor vaccines are being assessed and could further improve survival.     

Progress in multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer in Japan as reflected in JCOG studies

Changes in the standard treatment for esophageal cancer in Japan are reflected in the history of consecutive studies conducted by the Japan Esophageal Oncology Group (JEOG), a subgroup of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG). Following the era of preoperative radiotherapy in the 1970s, the emphasis in surgical adjuvant therapy shifted from postoperative radiotherapy in the 1980s to postoperative chemotherapy including cisplatin as a key drug in the 1990s. Later, the optimal timing for perioperative adjuvant therapy returned to before surgery based on the results of a JCOG study (JCOG9907) that compared preoperative chemotherapy with postoperative chemotherapy in the late 2000s. Next, the clinical question of which is better, preoperative aggressive chemotherapy or preoperative chemoradiotherapy, still needs to be resolved. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil became a standard non-surgical treatment for esophageal cancer from the early 1990s onwards. Based on the preferable results of definitive chemoradiotherapy for unresectable advanced disease, definitive chemoradiotherapy was considered to be a possible alternative treatment modality in stage I esophageal cancer patients. Therefore, JEOG conducted a phase III study (JCOG0502) to demonstrate the non-inferiority of chemoradiotherapy compared with surgery in patients with stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. If definitive chemoradiotherapy fails in patients with stage II/III esophageal cancer, salvage surgery is now recommended. Therefore, JEOG has initiated a phase II study (JCOG0909) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combined treatment modality.     

Evaluation of preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy on long-term functional results of straight coloanal anastomosis

PURPOSE: Preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer avoids radiation to the reconstructed rectum and may circumvent the detrimental effects on bowel function associated with postoperative radiotherapy. We compared the long-term functional results of patients who received preoperative radiotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy, or no radiotherapy in conjunction with low anterior resection and coloanal anastomosis to assess the impact of pelvic radiation on anorectal function. METHODS: One hundred nine patients treated by low anterior resection and straight coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer between 1986 and 1997 were assessed with a standardized questionnaire at two to eight years after resection. All radiotherapy was given to a total dose of 4,500 to 5,400 cGy with conventional doses and techniques. Most patients received concurrent 5-fluorouracil–based chemotherapy. RESULTS: There were 39 patients in the preoperative radiotherapy group, 11 patients in the postoperative radiotherapy group, and 59 patients in the no radiotherapy group. The postoperative radiotherapy group reported a significantly greater number of bowel movements per 24-hour period (P < 0.01) and significantly more episodes of clustered bowel movements (P < 0.02) than either the preoperative radiotherapy group or the no radiotherapy group. No significant difference in anal continence or satisfaction with bowel function was found among the three groups. CONCLUSION: In this study of straight (nonreservoir) coloanal anastomoses, postoperative pelvic radiotherapy had significant adverse effects on anorectal function, with higher rates of clustering and frequency of defecation than with preoperative radiotherapy. No differences in continence rates were demonstrated, perhaps because of the sample size of the compared groups. We attribute the adverse effects of postoperative radiotherapy to irradiation of the neorectum, which is spared when treatment is given preoperatively. The deleterious effects of adjuvant radiation on long-term anorectal function can be reduced by preoperative treatment.     

Primary Perineal Wound Closure After Preoperative Radiotherapy and Abdominoperineal Resection has a High Incidence of Wound Failure

PURPOSE Neoadjuvant radiation therapy has been used increasingly to downstage rectal cancer and decrease local recurrence. Despite its efficacy, preoperative radiation therapy may inhibit healing and contribute to wound complications. This study was designed to evaluate perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection.METHODS The clinical records of a consecutive series of patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma between 1988 and 2002 were reviewed. Demographic data, disease stage, and use of preoperative radiation therapy were recorded. Major wound complications included delayed wound healing (>1 month), wound infection requiring drainage/debridement, or reoperation.RESULTS A total of 160 patients underwent abdominoperineal resection with primary closure of the perineal wound (mean age, 63 ± 12 years); 117 (73 percent) patients received preoperative radiation therapy; 114 received radiation therapy for rectal cancer (radiation therapy + chemotherapy = 107, radiation therapy alone = 7); 3 received radiation therapy for other pelvic malignancies. Median radiation dose was 5,040 (range, 900–5,400) cGY. Overall wound complication rate was 41 percent. Major wound complication rate was 35 percent. Delayed healing was the most common complication (24 percent), followed by infection (10 percent). Radiation therapy increased the risk of any wound complication (47 vs. 23 percent; P = 0.005), risk of a major wound complication (41 vs. 19 percent; P = 0.021), and risk of infection (14 vs. 0 percent; P = 0.015). Risk of wound complications did not correlate with age, gender, disease stage, smoking, or diabetes.CONCLUSIONS Wound complications are frequent after abdominoperineal resection and primary closure of the perineum. Preoperative radiation therapy doubles the rate of total and major perineal wound complications. Alternatives to primary perineal closure should be considered, particularly after radiation therapy.Read at meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Dallas, Texas, May 8 to 13, 2004.