Disposition of minoxidil in patients with various degrees of renal function

The disposition of minoxidil was evaluated after a 5 mg oral dose in 24 subjects with various degrees of renal function. Patients were divided into four groups based on a 24-hour ambulatory creatinine clearance (Clcr): Group I (n = 6) Clcr greater than 90 mL/min, Group II (n = 6) Clcr 50-80 mL/min, Group III (n = 5) Clcr of 30-49 mL/min, and Group IV (n = 7) Clcr less than 30 mL/min. Blood and urine samples obtained over 36 hours were analyzed for minoxidil by a high pressure liquid chromatography technique. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach Cmax did not differ among the four groups. The terminal elimination half-life was prolonged in Group IV subjects (8.87 +/- 6.12 hours) (mean +/- SD) compared to those in Groups I, II and III (1.38 +/- 0.16, 1.99 +/- 0.45 and 2.42 +/- 0.53 hours, respectively). Apparent total body clearance (Clp/F) decreased as renal function declined; Clp/F = 0.82(Clcr) + 21.8, r = 0.739, P = 0.0001. Renal clearance and apparent nonrenal clearance also were significantly correlated with Clcr. The apparent volume of distribution significantly increased as renal function declined. Thus, the disposition of minoxidil is significantly delayed and dosage adjustment may be necessary in patients with renal insufficiency.     

Pharmacokinetics of ramipril in hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency

In an open trial, the pharmacokinetics of ramipril and its active metabolite ramiprilat were studied in 25 hypertensive patients with various degrees of renal insufficiency given 5 mg ramipril p.o. for 14 days. Ramipril was rapidly absorbed and reached a peak concentration after 1-2 h. Cmax was greater in patients with severe renal insufficiency, which might indicate a reduced renal elimination rate, although, the rapid decline of the concentration-time curve for ramipril was almost independent of renal function. The mean initial apparent half-lives on Days 1 and 12, respectively, were 2.8 and 3.4 h (Group I: creatinine clearance 5-15 ml/min), 1.8 and 2.3 h (Group II: creatinine clearance 15-40 ml/min), and 1.9 and 1.9 h (Group III: creatinine clearance 40-80 ml/min). No accumulation was observed after multiple dosing. In contrast, the kinetics of its active acid metabolite ramiprilat was significantly influenced by renal function. The mean times to the peak plasma concentration were 5.7 h in Group I, 4.4 h in Group II and 3.8 h in Group III. The initial decline in plasma ramiprilat was dependent upon renal function; the mean initial apparent half-lives (Days 1 and 12, respectively) were 16.0 and 14.8 h (Group I), 10.1 and 9.5 h (Group II) and 10.6 and 8.0 h (Group III). Mean trough concentrations and absolute accumulation also increased with worsening renal function, and the renal clearance of ramiprilat was significantly correlated with the creatinine clearance. The subsequent long terminal phase at low plasma ramiprilat concentrations represented slow dissociation of the ACE-inhibitor complex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Excretion of loratadine in human breast milk

The excretion of loratadine, a new nonsedating antihistamine, into human breast milk was studied in six lactating nonpregnant volunteers. Each volunteer received one 40-mg loratadine capsule. Milk and blood were collected before and at specified times (to 48 hours) after dosing. Plasma and milk loratadine concentrations were determined by a specific radioimmunoassay, and those of an active but minor metabolite, descarboethoxyloratadine, by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Breast milk concentration-time curves of both loratadine and descarboethoxyloratadine paralleled the plasma concentration-time curves. For loratadine, the plasma Cmax was 30.5 ng/mL at 1.0 hour after dosing and the milk Cmax was 29.2 ng/mL in the 0 to 2 hour collection interval. Through 48 hours, the loratadine milk-plasma AUC ratio was 1.2 and 4.2 micrograms of loratadine was excreted in breast milk, which was 0.010% of the administered dose. For descarboethoxyloratadine, the plasma Cmax was 18.6 ng/mL at 2.2 hours after dosing, whereas the milk Cmax was 16.0 ng/mL, which was in the 4 to 8-hour collection interval. Through 48 hours, the mean milk-plasma descarboethoxyloratadine AUC ratio was 0.8 and a mean of 6.0 micrograms of descarboethoxyloratadine (7.5 micrograms loratadine equivalents) were excreted in the breast milk, or 0.019% of the administered loratadine dose. Thus, a total of 11.7 micrograms loratadine equivalents or 0.029% of the administered dose were excreted as loratadine and its active metabolite. A 4-kg infant ingesting the loratadine and descarboethoxyloratadine excreted would receive a dose equivalent to 0.46% of the loratadine dose received by the mother on a mg/kg basis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of loratadine

The dose proportionality and pharmacokinetics of loratadine, a new nonsedating antihistamine, were studied in 12 normal volunteers. In a three-way cross-over, each volunteer received a single 10-, 20-, or 40-mg loratadine capsule. Blood was collected up to 96 hours after dosing. Plasma loratadine concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA), and those of a minor, but active metabolite, descarboethoxyloratadine, by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Concentrations in the disposition phase were fitted to a biexponential equation for pharmacokinetic analysis. For dose proportionality, AUC- and Cmax-dose relationships were evaluated by linear regression. Also, pharmacokinetic parameters and dose-adjusted AUCs were compared by analysis of variance. Loratadine was rapidly absorbed, reaching Cmax values (4.7, 10.8, and 26.1 ng/mL) at 1.5, 1.0 and 1.2 hours for the 10-, 20-, and 40-mg doses, respectively. The loratadine t1/2 beta ranged from 7.8 to 11.0 hours. Descarboethoxyloratadine reached Cmax values (4.0, 9.9, and 16.0 ng/mL) at 3.7, 1.5, and 2.0 hours for the 10-, 20-, and 40-mg doses, respectively. Its t1/2 beta ranged from 17 to 24 hours. For both compounds, AUC- and Cmax-dose relationships were linear and there were no differences in the t1/2 beta, CL/F, or dose-adjusted AUC values among the treatments. Loratadine and descarboethoxyloratadine plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetics were not dose dependent.     

Effect of cyp2d6*10 allele on the pharmacokinetics of loratadine in chinese subjects.

Loratadine is known to be a substrate for both CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 based on a previous in vitro study. In view of the large interindividual variability in loratadine pharmacokinetics and the greater genetically determined variability of CYP2D6 activity than of CYP3A4 in vivo, we hypothesized that CYP2D6 polymorphisms may contribute to the pharmacokinetic variability of loratadine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of CYP2D6 genotype (specifically the CYP2D6*10 allele) on the pharmacokinetics of loratadine in Chinese subjects. Three groups of healthy male Chinese subjects were enrolled: group I, homozygous CYP2D6*1 (*1/*1, n=4); group II, heterozygous CYP2D6*10 (*1/*10 or *2/*10, n=6); and group III, homozygous CYP2D6*10 (*10/*10, n=7) carriers. Each subject received a single oral dose of 20 mg of loratadine under fasting conditions. Multiple blood samples were collected over 48 h, and the plasma concentrations of loratadine and its metabolite desloratadine were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. In comparing homozygous CYP2D6*10 (group III) to heterozygous CYP2D6*10 (group II) to homozygous CYP2D6*1 (group I) subjects, loratadine oral clearance values were 7.17+/- 2.54 versus 11.06+/-1.70 versus 14.59+/-2.43 l/h/kg, respectively [one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), p<0.01], and the corresponding metabolic ratios [area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC)(desloratadine)/AUC(loratadine)] were 1.55+/-0.73 versus 2.47+/- 0.46 versus 3.32+/- 0.49, respectively (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05), indicating a gene-dose effect. The results demonstrated that CYP2D6 polymorphism prevalent in the Chinese population significantly affected loratadine pharmacokinetics.     

Interference of digoxin-like immunoreactive substances with three digoxin immunoassays in patients with various degrees of renal function

The effect of renal function and digoxin use in adult patients on interference from digoxin-like immunoreactive substances (DLIS) with three digoxin immunoassays was studied. Hospital patients entered into the study were categorized into the following groups according to renal function: group I (serum creatinine less than 1.5 mg/dL), group II (serum creatinine 1.5-2.5 mg/dL), group III (serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dL, not on hemodialysis), and group IV (serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dL, on maintenance hemodialysis). Medical records were reviewed to determine whether or not patients were receiving digoxin. Excess sera for analysis of serum digoxin concentrations (SDCs) was collected from routine laboratory tests. Serum samples were assayed singly by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA, Digoxin I, Abbott), radioimmunoassay (RIA, Micromedic), and affinity-column-mediated immunoassay (ACMIA, aca, E.I. du Pont). Correlation of SDCs obtained by RIA and ACMIA with FPIA results was determined using linear-regression analysis. A total of 177 patients met the study criteria; 98 were receiving digoxin. In patients on digoxin, SDCs by RIA were significantly higher than those obtained by FPIA in group II and III patients. SDCs obtained by ACMIA correlated well with and were not significantly different from those obtained by FPIA in any of the patient groups. Maximum differences and mean absolute differences in SDCs obtained by RIA were greater than those for ACMIA when compared with FPIA values in all patient groups. Over 40% of patients with renal dysfunction not on digoxin had false-positive SDCs by RIA; the highest of these values was seen in groups II and III.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Single-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of pegylated interferon-alpha2b in patients with chronic renal dysfunction

This study evaluates the pharmacokinetics and safety of pegylated interferon-alpha2b (PEG-Intron) following a single-dose subcutaneous injection into subjects with normal renal function, subjects with chronic renal impairment, and patients on hemodialysis. In this open-label, single-dose, parallel group study, subjects were divided into five groups according to their degree of renal function: four groups as defined by measured creatinine clearance and a fifth hemodialysis dependent group. They received 1 microg/kg PEG-Intron subcutaneously after a 10-hour fast. Pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were performed up to 168 hours postdose. Hemodialysis patients had a second PEG-Intron dose 12 hours prior to a hemodialysis session. PEG-Intron pharmacokinetic parameters (AUCtf, Cmax, and t1/2) increased progressively as CL(CR) declined. All subjects reported at least one adverse event, which were typical of those reported after alpha-interferon administration (e.g., flu-like symptoms, headache). Single-dose PEG-Intron administration to volunteers with normal renal function and chronic renal impairment was safe and well tolerated. In patients with CL(CR) < 30 ml/min, AUCand Cmax values were increased 90% compared with controls, while half-life was increased by up to 40% over controls. Based on the relationship between PEG-Intron apparent clearance and CL(CR), renal clearance accountsfor less than half of its total clearance. Hemodialysis did not affect PEG-Intron apparent clearance.     

Disposition of famotidine in renal insufficiency

The disposition of famotidine was evaluated in 18 patients; Group 1, mild renal insufficiency, [creatinine clearance (CLCR): 30-60 mL/min]; Group 2, moderate to severe renal insufficiency (CLCR: 10-30 mL/min); Group 3, end-stage renal disease requiring maintenance hemodialysis (anuric). Blood and urine samples were obtained over a 72-hour period. Plasma concentration-time data demonstrated biexponential decay. The terminal elimination half-life was prolonged in Group 3 (18.6 +/- 5.7 hr) compared with Groups 1 (9.3 +/- 2.3 hr) and 2 (9.7 +/- 1.7 hr), P less than .05. Steady-state volume of distribution ranged from 0.80 to 1.26 L/kg but did not differ among the groups. Total body clearance (CLp) and renal clearance were significantly lower in Groups 2 and 3 patients compared with Group 1 patients. Nonrenal clearance was not related to CLCR. The CLp correlated well with CLCR (CLp = 1.59 CLCR + 33.8, r = 0.830, P less than .05). These data indicate that dosage adjustment may be necessary in patients who have renal insufficiency.     

Gentamicin disposition in young and elderly patients with various degrees of renal function

The effect of aging on the total body clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life of gentamicin was examined in 99 febrile patients with various degrees of renal function. In the 50 patients who were 18 to 64 years old, clearance of gentamicin was 79.0 +/- 27.0 mL/min (mean +/- standard deviation), creatinine clearance was 98.6 +/- 33.3 mL/min, volume of distribution was 0.242 +/- 0.077 L/kg, and half-life was 2.63 +/- 0.90 hours. In the 49 patients who were 65 to 90 years old, these values were 36.9 +/- 16.3 mL/min, 51.2 +/- 21.2 mL/min, 0.244 +/- 0.102 L/kg, and 5.80 +/- 4.13 hours. Significant differences were observed between the two groups for all parameters except volume of distribution. Linear regression revealed good correlations between the disposition characteristics (clearance and elimination-rate constant) of gentamicin and age as well as creatinine clearance. However, there was no apparent relationship between the ratio of gentamicin clearance to creatinine clearance and age (r = .0731). These findings suggest that the disposition of gentamicin is independent of age but dependent on renal function.     

Disposition of cefpodoxime proxetil in hemodialysis patients.

The disposition of cefpodoxime after single, oral 200-mg doses of cefpodoxime proxetil (cefpodoxime equivalents) was investigated in an open-label study of six patients with end-stage renal disease currently maintained on hemodialysis. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups, which differed in the sequence of the interdialytic and intradialytic periods. Doses were separated by at least 2 weeks. Blood samples were serially collected for 48 hours after each treatment; if obtainable, urine was also collected over this same period. During the intradialytic period, hemodialysis was scheduled to begin approximately 3 hours after dosing, and dialysate was collected before and until the end of dialysis. Average cefpodoxime elimination half-life for the interdialytic period was 18.0 +/- 6.5 hours; apparent total body clearance was 28.6 +/- 13 mL/minute. The half-life during hemodialysis, 2.66 +/- 0.74 hours, was considerably shorter than that after hemodialysis, 19.2 +/- 3.5 hours, in the intradialytic period of the study. Hemodialysis clearance of cefpodoxime was 120 +/- 31 mL/minute, which was 57.1 +/- 13% and 71.7 +/- 25% of the hemodialysis clearance for urea nitrogen and creatinine, respectively. The 2.86 +/- 0.25 hour hemodialysis session removed 22.4 +/- 2.9% of the administered dose, as assessed by cefpodoxime recovery in dialysate. A maximum rebound in cefpodoxime plasma concentration of 0.41 +/- 0.33 mcg/mL was observed, at about one-half hour after the end of hemodialysis. Based on these results, dosage adjustment is not required, but extension of the dosing interval is warranted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Paracetamol test: Modification by renal function,urine flow and pH

Factors which might affect paracetamol disposition have been studied in a heterogenous group of patients in need of mild analgesia in an intensive care unit. Following oral administration of 1 g of paracetamol, plasma and urinary concentrations of the parent compound and metabolites were assessed by HPLC. The renal clearance of paracetamol was significantly correlated with urine flow (r = 0.84) and creatinine clearance (r = 0.77), but not with urine pH. Metabolite output was diminished in patients with reduced renal function. Despite the heterogeneity of patients and the diversity of drug treatment, the urine to plasma paracetamol concentration ratio appeared remarkably constant in patients with normal renal function (9.8 +/- 2.7). It is concluded that the metabolite to paracetamol ratio may only be regarded as a measure of the drug metabolizing capacity in subjects with normal renal function, if factors influencing urine volume and paracetamol absorption are standardized.     

Pharmacodynamic study of low molecular weight dermatan sulphate (Desmin) after a single subcutaneous administration in patients with renal insufficiency

The pharmacodynamic pattern of low molecular weight dermatan sulphate (CAS 24967-94-0, Desmin-LMWDS) was studied in patients presenting chronic renal insufficiency. Three groups of six patients were defined according to their creatinine clearance: group 1, more than 50 ml/min, group 2 between 10 and 50 ml/min and group 3 lower than 10 ml/min (haemodialized patients). Desmin-LMWDS concentrations were determined with the Heptest assay and the chromogenic specific heparin cofactor II dependent anti IIa assay. In patients of group 1 affected by moderate renal insufficiency, the pharmacodynamic profiles were roughly comparable to those obtained in normal subjects. In the two other groups, the profiles were markedly modified by the renal insufficiency. The maximal concentrations were doubled and the areas under the time-activity curve were 4-fold higher in haemodialyzed (group 3) and severe renal insufficient patients (group 2) than in patients of group 1. The clearance of the anti IIa activity were 13.98 +/- 6.25 l/h; 4.12 +/- 2.64 l/h and 2.94 +/- 1.53 l/h and the half-lives were 2.79 +/- 2.60 h, 6.15 +/- 4.02 h and 11.51 +/- 6.54 h in groups 1 to 3, respectively (p < 0.05). The Desmin-LMWDS clearance was directly correlated to the creatinine clearance (r = 0.8244, n = 18, p < 0.001). Thus, as for low molecular weight heparin, renal function plays a major role in the elimination of low molecular weight dermatan sulphate.     

The effects of renal function on the disposition of isradipine

The effect of renal function on isradipine kinetics was examined in four groups of subjects (N = 55) who had normal or impaired renal function. Each subject received isradipine orally as a 10-mg capsule. Serial blood samples were obtained from 0 to 48 hours postdose and the isradipine plasma concentrations determined by radioimmunoassay. Kinetic parameters, Cmax, lambda 3, t 1/2, AUC, CL'o (oral clearance), and CLo (oral clearance standardized to body weight) were determined. Marked intersubject variability of the pharmacokinetic parameters was observed. No statistically significant differences (P greater than .05) were found for AUC, Cl'o, and Clo parameters when renal impairment groups were compared with controls. AUC values were lower (P less than .05), however, for the group with severe renal function impairment than for groups with mild or moderate renal function impairment. No significant correlations (r = -.23, P greater than .05; and r = .13, P greater than .05, respectively) were found between creatinine clearance (CLCR) and CLo and between age and CLo. Considering the interpatient variability in isradipine disposition and the lack of significant differences in CLo between groups, no clear-cut dosing regimen alterations, based on single-dose data, are warranted in renal impairment.     

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of bisoprolol

The technique of population pharmacokinetic analysis was employed to study the variability in the dose concentration relationship of bisoprolol during its clinical development. The influence of demographic factors on the variability of clearance was investigated in 3 different populations: group I, patients (including an elderly group) with essential hypertension receiving multiple oral doses of bisoprolol 10 or 20mg for 3 months; group II, patients with different degrees of renal impairment and healthy controls; and group III, patients with different types of hepatic impairment and healthy controls. Patients and controls in groups II and III received only a single oral dose of bisoprolol 10mg. The 3 data sets were analysed separately, using a non-linear mixed effects model (the NONMEM program). A 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order absorption described the data adequately. The typical values of volume of central compartment, volume of distribution at steady-state and the absorption rate constant for the 3 populations were: for group I, 68L, 235L, and 0.7h-1; for group II, 28L, 179L, and 0.3h-1; and for group III, 55L, 256L, and 0.4h-1, respectively. Plasma clearance was related to age in group I, to serum creatinine in group II and to aspartate transaminase activity in group III. The 68% confidence limits for clearance and elimination half-life were 8.2 to 21.5 L/h and 7.6 to 19.7h, respectively, for 50-year-old patients in group I. The analysis predicted that progressive increases in serum creatinine or aspartate transaminase activity will result in only a 50% reduction of clearance.     

Pharmacokinetics of flutamide in patients with renal insufficiency

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of flutamide, a nonsteroidal antiandrogenic compound, and its pharmacologically active metabolite, hydroxyflutamide, in renal insufficiency. Haemodialysis (HD) clearance of flutamide and hydroxyflutamide was also determined. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed for flutamide and hydroxyflutamide in 26 male subjects with normal renal function (creatinine clearance by 24 h urine collection, CLcr, greater than 80 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2); n=6) or reduced renal function; CLcr=50-80 (n=7), 30-49 (n=3), 5-29 (n=4), and <5 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2)-HD (n=6), following a single, oral 250 mg flutamide dose. Subjects undergoing HD received a second 250 mg dose of flutamide 4 h prior to HD; blood and dialysate were collected during HD to determine dialysability of flutamide and hydroxyflutamide. RESULTS: Cmax, tmax, AUC, t1/2, and renal clearance of flutamide and hydroxyflutamide did not differ between groups. Less than 1% of the dose appeared in dialysate as hydroxyflutamide. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Renal function did not affect flutamide nor hydroxyflutamide disposition. HD did not alter hydroxyflutamide pharmacokinetics. Dosing adjustments for renal impairment or HD are not indicated for flutamide.     

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, kidney tolerability and plasma protein binding of tenoxicam in renally impaired patients and healthy volunteers

The 20 mg single-dose and 12 days repeated-dose pharmacokinetics of tenoxicam and the 5-OH-tenoxicam metabolite have been evaluated in healthy volunteers and two groups of patients with different degree of renal impairment, in total 20 persons. Concomitantly, the plasma protein binding of tenoxicam and the effects of treatment on renal function were evaluated. No differences were found between the investigated groups in the pharmacokinetics of total tenoxicam and the 5-OH metabolite did not interfere either with the pharmacokinetics or with the plasma protein binding of tenoxicam. A positive correlation was found between an increase in the free fraction (% F) of tenoxicam in plasma and a decrease in the plasma elimination half-life in the low creatinine clearance group (40-20 ml/min.) both after the single-dose and at steady-state. At steady-state, a non-linear correlation was demonstrated between a decrease in the urinary excretion of the 5-OH metabolite and a decrease in creatinine clearance from 130 to 20 ml/min. An increase in the plasma level of the 5-OH metabolite by three times was found in the low creatinine clearance group as compared to healthy subjects. 14C-Impurities of tenoxicam, as low as 1.2%, were shown to greatly influence the determination of the plasma protein binding (equilibrium dialysis) of the highly protein-bound tenoxicam due to a non-binding ability of the impurities to plasma proteins. No significant changes in renal parameters were found during the study. It can be concluded that the pharmacokinetics and plasma protein binding of tenoxicam and the pharmacokinetics of the 5-OH-tenoxicam metabolite are increasingly changed in subjects with a creatinine clearance below 40 ml/min. A decreased binding of tenoxicam to plasma proteins in low clearance patients is probably the reason for a faster elimination of tenoxicam in this group rather than a higher intrinsic hepatic metabolic activity. This study conducted in a low number of patients did not bring forward any new data indicating any adverse effects of tenoxicam on renal function.     

Disposition of guanadrel in subjects with normal and impaired renal function

The disposition of a single 25 mg oral dose of guanadrel was evaluated in 22 subjects with various degrees of renal function. The terminal elimination half-life was significantly prolonged in subjects with a creatinine clearance (ClCr) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (19.2 +/- 16.8 h) compared to 3.7 +/- 1.9 h in subjects with a ClCr greater than 80 mL/min/1.73 m2. Apparent total body clearance (Clp/F) was also progressively lower in the patients with decreased renal function and the decline was significantly correlated with ClCr (Clp/F = 0.0294 + 0.0236 Clcr, r = 0.74, P = 0.002). Renal clearance and apparent nonrenal clearance also declined as creatinine clearance decreased, and both were significantly correlated with the observed ClCr. Apparent volume of distribution averaged 11.5 +/- 8.9 L/kg and did not differ in patients with decreased renal function compared to those with normal renal function. Thus, the disposition of guanadrel is significantly altered in the presence of renal insufficiency and dosage adjustments may be necessary, especially in patients with ClCr less than 50 ml/min.     

Pethidine pharmacokinetics after intramuscular dose: a comparison in Caucasian, Chinese and Nepalese patients.

The pharmacokinetics of pethidine after a single intramuscular injection were studied in 30 male patients of Caucasian, Chinese and Nepalese extraction. There were no significant differences between the three ethnic groups in the mean time for maximum absorption (tmax) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of pethidine. The mean (+/- S.D.) elimination half life (t1/2) of pethidine was shorter in Caucasians (4.5 +/- 1.3 h) compared with Nepalese (6.3 +/- 1.6 h) and Chinese (8.1 +/- 3.1 h) (p < 0.01). The plasma clearance of pethidine was greater in Caucasians (14.2 +/- 4.8 ml.min-1.kg-1) than in Nepalese (12.6 +/- 2.9 ml.min-1.kg-1) and Chinese (10.0 +/- 2.9 ml.min-1.kg-1) (p < 0.05); yet the apparent renal clearance was similar (64.1 +/- 22.9, 86.7 +/- 44.5 and 61.4 +/- 30.1 ml.min-1.kg-1, respectively, for the Chinese (n = 6), Caucasian (n = 6) and Nepalese (n = 9) patients). No apparent ethnic differences were found in the tmax and Cmax of norpethidine which emerged as the major metabolite in the plasma in the three races. An apparently higher area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC infinity [symbol: see text]) and longer elimination t1/2 of the metabolite were observed in the two Asian patient groups. It appears that both the Chinese and Indian groups did not eliminate pethidine as effectively as the Caucasians after a single intramuscular injection, which may be the result of interethnic variability in the metabolism of pethidine. Caution may be required on multiple dosing of pethidine in Asian patients due to the possible accumulation of the parent drug and its toxic metabolite, norpethidine.     

Pharmacokinetics of nicorandil in patients with normal and impaired renal function

Summary The pharmacokinetics of oral nicorandil 20 mg 12 hourly for 9 doses was evaluated in 21 hospitalized patients with angina pectoris due to coronary heart disease and with normal and impaired renal function. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on creatinine clearance (CL_Cr): GROUP I (n=6) > 80 ml/min, GROUP II (n=8) 20–80 ml/min, and GROUP III (n=7) < 20 ml/min.After the first dose, the total clearance of nicorandil (CL) value did not change with increasing renal failure and so was not dependent on creatinine clearance. After the last dose CL was 51 l·h^–1 in Group I, 44 l·h^–1 in Group II and 56 l·h^–1 in Group III, and it was not related to creatinine clearance. The percentage of the dose excreted in the urine was 0.4%. No significant difference was noted in any of the other pharmacokinetic parameters examined in the three groups, not even on comparing values obtained on the first and last days of treatment.The findings suggest that there is no need to change the dose of nicorandil in subjects with different degrees of renal failure.