| 水声材料小样品声学性能不同测试方法比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 樊宁波,任伟伟,乔冬平.水声材料小样品声学性能不同测试方法比较[J].材料开发与应用,2021,36(3):25-29. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 樊宁波 任伟伟 乔冬平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所, 河南 洛阳 471023 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 介绍了水声材料声学性能的3种不同的测试方法，通过对同种样品的性能测试，分析了不同测试方法的优缺点。结果表明，与行波法相比，脉冲法和驻波法测试可靠性较高。
|
| 关 键 词： | 脉冲法 驻波法 行波法 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-09-07 |
Comparison of Different Testing Methods for Acoustic Properties of Small Samples of Underwater Acoustic Materials |
| |
| FAN Ningbo,REN Weiwei,QIAO Dongping.Comparison of Different Testing Methods for Acoustic Properties of Small Samples of Underwater Acoustic Materials[J].Development and Application of Materials,2021,36(3):25-29. |
| |
| Authors: | FAN Ningbo REN Weiwei QIAO Dongping |
| |
| Affiliation: | Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute, Luoyang 471023, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Three different testing methods for acoustic properties of underwater acoustic materials were presented. Through the performance test and analysis of the same kinds of samples, the advantages and disadvantages of different test methods were compared. The results showed that compared with traveling wave method, pulse method and standing wave method were more reliable in testing. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《材料开发与应用》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《材料开发与应用》下载全文 |
