首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

犯罪构成理论与犯罪事实认定关系考察
作者姓名:王充
作者单位:吉林大学法学院
摘    要:犯罪认定是一个动态的价值判断过程,司法三段论是这一判断过程的逻辑体现,在寻找大前提、确定小前提以及大小前提涵摄判断的过程中,犯罪构成理论并不能发挥实际的作用,因为犯罪的认定与犯罪构成理论之间并不具有必然的关联性,采取何种犯罪论体系也不会影响犯罪认定的结果。犯罪构成理论只是针对刑法规定的犯罪成立条件进行理论解读和体系建构的结果,作为解释结论它被解释对象和解释主体的前见所决定,在解释对象即刑法规定不变的前提下,不同的犯罪构成理论体系只是不同解释主体从不同逻辑前提出发所作的不同解释选择。

关 键 词:犯罪构成理论  犯罪认定  实践性  司法三段论

Practical Investigation on the Theory of Constitution of Crime
Authors:Wang Chong
Abstract:Crime identification is a dynamic process of value judgment. Judicial syllogism is the logical embodiment of this process. In the process of seeking for the major premise,determining the minor premise and the size premise, the theory of criminal constitution can not play a practical role, because there is no correlation between the crime identification and the theory of criminal constitution, and then, what kind of criminal constitution theory system should be adopted that does not affect the result of crime determination. The theory of criminal constitution is only the result of theoretical interpretation and system construction of the content of the crime stipulated in criminal law. As the conclusion of interpretation, it is decided by the foresight of the object and the subject of the interpretation. If the criminal law is unchanged, different theoretical systems of constitution of crime are just different interpretations choose made by different subjects from different logical premises.
Keywords:the theory of constitution of crime  crime identification  practicality  judicial syllogism
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号