| 多种职业健康风险评估方法在污水处理行业中的应用研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 冯玉超,赵远,高原,张海,刘移民.多种职业健康风险评估方法在污水处理行业中的应用研究[J].职业卫生与应急救援,2021,39(1):45-49,79. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 冯玉超 赵远 高原 张海 刘移民 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.广州市第十二人民医院(广州市职业病防治院), 广东 广州 510620 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金(81470146);广州市民生科技重大项目(2014Y2-00067);广州市职业环境与健康效应重点实验室建设项目(2014SY000020);广州市医学重点学科建设项目(穗卫科教〔2016〕27号);广州市“121人才梯队工程”后备人才项目(穗人社发〔2011〕167号);广州市卫生健康科技项目(20201A011050)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 比较多种职业健康风险评估方法在污水处理行业重点岗位中的适用性。 方法 以3家污水处理企业为研究对象，采用美国国家环境保护署吸入风险评估模型法（简称EPA法）、GBZ/T 229工作场所职业病危害作业分级法、GBZ/T 298-2017综合指数法、国际采矿和金属委员会职业健康风险评估模型法（简称ICMM法）以及澳大利亚职业安全健康风险评估方法（简称澳大利亚法）对接触氨（NH3）和硫化氢（H2S）、粉尘作业岗位的职业健康风险进行评估，比较多种风险评估结果。 结果 3家污水处理厂各岗位NH3、H2S和粉尘检测结果均符合国家接触限值要求。经风险比值对各方法的风险评估结果进行标准化后，EPA法的评估结果显示各岗位H2S的职业健康风险均为极高风险（5级），NH3均为中等风险（3级）；GBZ/T 229作业分级法和ICMM矩阵法的评估结果显示NH3、H2S和粉尘的职业健康风险均为低风险（2级）；ICMM定量法的评估结果显示NH3、H2S及粉尘的职业健康风险均为可忽略风险（1级）；GBZ/T 298-2017综合指数法的评估结果显示NH3、H2S的职业健康风险均为中等风险（3级），粉尘为可忽略风险（1级）；澳大利亚法的评估结果显示NH3、H2S的职业健康风险为高风险（4级），粉尘为中等风险（3级）。 结论 几种风险评估方法对污水处理行业职业健康风险的评估结果不尽一致，GBZ/T 298-2017综合指数法结合澳大利亚法更适用于污水处理行业的职业健康风险评估。
|
| 关 键 词： | 污水处理 职业健康 风险评估 氨 硫化氢 噪声 广州市 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-04-22 |
Application of different risk assessment methods in occupational health risk assessment in sewage treatment industry |
| |
| FENG Yuchao,ZHAO Yuan,GAO Yuan,ZHANG Hai,LIU YiMin.Application of different risk assessment methods in occupational health risk assessment in sewage treatment industry[J].Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue,2021,39(1):45-49,79. |
| |
| Authors: | FENG Yuchao ZHAO Yuan GAO Yuan ZHANG Hai LIU YiMin |
| |
| Affiliation: | (The 12th People's Hospital of Guangzhou,Guangzhou Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment Hospital,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510620,China;Baiyun branch of Nanfang Hospital,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510500,China;School of public health,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510080,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective The applicability of different risk assessment methods to occupational health risk assessment of key work places in sewage treatment industry was compared. Methods The EPA method,GBZ/T 229 workplace occupational hazard classification method,GBZ/T 298-2017 comprehensive index method,ICMM method and Australian method were used to assess the occupational health risk in 3 sewage treatment enterprises. The occupational health risk in the key workplaces where workers exposed to ammonia,hydrogen sulfide and dust were evaluated. The risk levels got by different methods were standardized and compared. Results The exposure levels of NH3,H2 S and dust in each workplace in 3 sewage treatment plants were lower than national exposure limits. EPA method showed that the occupational health risk of H2 S in each workplace was extremely high(level 5),and risk of NH3 was medium(level 3). Both GBZ/T 229 job classification method and ICMM matrix method showed that the occupational health risks of NH3,H2 S and dust were low(level 2). The ICMM showed that the occupational health risks of NH3,H2 S and dust were negligible(level 1). GBZ/T298-2017 comprehensive index method showed that the occupational health risks of NH3 and H2 S were medium(level 3),and risk of dust was negligible(level 1). Australian method showed that the occupational health risk of NH3 and H2 S was high(level 4),and the risk of dust was medium(level 3). Conclusions The different risk assessment methods showed various results of occupational health risk in the sewage treatment industry. GBZ/T 298-2017 comprehensive index method combined with Australian method is more suitable for occupational health risk assessment in sewage treatment industry. |
| |
| Keywords: | sewage treatment occupational health risk assessment ammonia hydrogen sulfide noise Guangzhou City |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《职业卫生与应急救援》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《职业卫生与应急救援》下载全文 |
|
