自动与人工观测的气压差异分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中国气象局气象新技术推广项目(CMA TG2008Z12)


Difference between automatic and manual air pressure observations
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    利用陕西省97个气象站2004—2007年间自动与人工平行观测期间的资料,分析了陕西和陕西不同地域人工与自动观测气压的差异并对气压月、年平均值进行了显著性检验。结果表明:人工观测比自动观测日平均气压平均偏高021 hPa,标准差为030 hPa;气压差值有明显的地域特征;气压对比差值的日、月变化规律明显;DYYZ 和CAWS 系列测压仪的性能没有明显差异;自动与人工观测时间不同步对定时值有一定影响,但对气候分析没有影响;校准值随时间漂移是气压传感器的主要误差源之一;自动站所测气压可与人工站气压连续使用。

    Abstract:

    The comparative data of air pressure at manual and automatic observation at 97 weather stations in 2004, 2005, 2007 are used to analyze the difference between the two systems in Shaanxi and different areas of Shaanxi. The result indicates that daily average air pressure of manual observation is 021 hPa  higher than the automatic one and the standard deviation is 030 hPa. There is obvious difference among different areas. However,there is no obvious difference between DYYZ and CAWS instrument. Daily and monthly variety regulation is obvious. The time difference between automatic recording and manual observation has certain influence on hourly data but has no influence on climate analysis. The calibration value drifting is the main error for pressure sensor. The pressure data recorded by automatic stations can be continuously used with manual one.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张红娟,任芝花,陈高峰,曾英.自动与人工观测的气压差异分析.气象科学,2010,(3):402-406 Zhang Hongjuan, Ren Zhihua, Chen Gaofeng, Zeng Ying. Difference between automatic and manual air pressure observations. Journal of the Meteorological Sciences,2010,(3):402-406

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2009-06-01
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2012-07-05
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者
气象科学 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司