石油焦气化反应动力学及其反应性与焦结构的关系

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2022.05.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 石油焦结构致密，孔隙不发达，灰分及挥发分含量低，导致其气化活性较低。焦结构是影响石油焦气化反应活性高低的重要因素，为阐明石油焦气化反应特性及其与焦结构的关联，采用热重分析仪对镇海石油焦、京博石油焦和胜利石油焦进行CO₂非等温气化反应特性研究，并结合石油焦结构的表征分析，探讨焦结构对气化反应性的影响规律。结果表明：利用比气化速率能够较好地描述3种石油焦的气化反应性差异，气化活性由大到小顺序为胜利石油焦、京博石油焦、镇海石油焦；依据比气化速率随温度的变化规律，可将石油焦的等温气化反应分为慢速、中速、快速3个阶段；石油焦结构分析发现，石油焦气化反应性与焦结构的有序度和CO₂化学吸附量关联性较好，其焦结构有序化程度及其CO₂总吸附量均可用来反映其气化反应性高低；利用比气化速率作为对应恒温气化条件下速率常数计算得到胜利石油焦、京博石油焦和镇海石油焦的气化反应活化能分别为216、245和280 kJ/mol。

关键词: 石油焦, 非等温气化, 热重分析, 焦结构, 动力学

Abstract: Petroleum coke is characterized with compact structure, underdeveloped pore structure and low content of ash and volatiles, resulting in relatively low gasification reactivity. As coke structure is an important factor affecting the gasification reactivity of petroleum coke, in order to clarify the gasification characteristics of petroleum coke and its relation with coke structure, thermogravimetric analyzer was used to study the non-isothermal CO₂ gasification characteristics of Zhenhai petroleum coke (ZH), Chambroad petroleum coke (CB) and Shengli petroleum coke (SL), based on which the influence rule of coke structure on the gasification reactivity was discussed through the characterization analysis of petroleum coke structure. The results show that specific gasification rate can be used to better describe the differences in the gasification reactivity of three petroleum cokes, and the gasification activities in descending order are as follows: SL>CB>ZH. According to the law that specific gasification rate changes with temperature, the isothermal gasification of petroleum coke can be divided into three stages: slow reaction stage, medium reaction stage and fast reaction stage. The structural analysis of petroleum coke reveals that its gasification reactivity and the orderliness of coke structure has good correlation with CO₂ chemisorption, and the orderliness of coke structure and total CO₂ absorption can be used to reflect its gasification reactivity. In addition, specific gasification rate, as the rate constant under corresponding isothermal gasification conditions, can be used to calculate activation energies in the gasification reaction of SL, CB and ZH, which are 216, 245 and 280 kJ/mol, respectively.

Key words: petroleum coke, non-isothermal gasification, thermogravimetric analysis, coke structure, kinetics

中图分类号:

TQ546.2

向欣宁, 张乾, 郝泽光, 张宏文, 高增林, 涂椿滟, 梁丽彤, 黄伟. 石油焦气化反应动力学及其反应性与焦结构的关系[J]. 石油学报（石油加工）, 2022, 38(5): 1181-1193.

XIANG Xinning, ZHANG Qian, HAO Zeguang, ZHANG Hongwen, Gao Zenglin, TU Chunyan, LIANG Litong, HUANG Wei. Gasification Kinetics of Petroleum Coke and the Relationship Between the Gasification Reactivity and Coke Structure[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica(Petroleum Processing Section), 2022, 38(5): 1181-1193.

参考文献

[1]欧阳平, 崔佃淼, 张然, 等.钾基复合催化剂对高硫石油焦气化性能的影响[J].石油学报石油加工, 2020, 36(2):262-272
[2]纪丽媛, 黄胜, 吴诗勇, 等.原煤与石油焦共气化反应特性[J].石油学报石油加工, 2014, 30(3):493-500
[3]王晨平, 段钰锋, 佘敏, 等.活化改性石油焦吸附剂的汞吸附特性[J].化工学报, 2017, 68(12):4764-4773
[4]LIANG Chen, LYU Qinggang, NA Yongjie, et al.Gasification of preheated coal: Experiment and thermodynamic equilibrium calculation[J].Journal of the Energy Institute, 2019, 92(4):1005-1013
[5]TAKUYA Y, YUUKO F, YOSHIO M, et al.Modeling of gasification and fragmentation behavior of char particles having complicated structures[J].Combustion and Flame, 2006, 146(1-2):85-94
[6]WU Youqing, WANG Jianjian, WU Shiyong, et al.Potassium-catalyzed steam gasification of petroleum coke for H2 production: Reactivity,selectivity and gas release[J].Fuel Processing Technology, 2011, 92(3):523-530
[7]SABER J M, KESTER K B, FALCONER J L, et al.A mechanism for sodium oxide catalyzed CO2 gasification of carbon[J].Journal of Catalysis, 1988, 109(2):329-346
[8]赵冰, 周志杰, 丁路, 等.快速热处理石油焦与煤的微观结构变化及气化活性分析[J].燃料化学学报, 2013, 41(1):40-45
[9]吴幼青.不同热解过程产物炭的理化性质及石油焦催化气化反应特性研究[D]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2010.
[10]李宏俊, 黄波, 代正华, 等.超临界萃取对石油焦气化特性的影响[J].石油学报石油加工, 2017, 33(3):480-488
[11]WEI Juntao, WANG Miao, WANG Fuchen, et al.A review on reactivity characteristics and synergy behavior of biomass and coal Co-gasification[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(33):17116-17132
[12]ZHU Shenghua, BAI Yonghui, LUO Kang, et al.Impacts of CO2 on char structure and the gasification reactivity[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2017, 128: 13-17.
[13]WEI Juntao, GUO Qinghua, GONG Yan, et al.Effect of biomass leachates on structure evolution and reactivity characteristic of petroleum coke gasification[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 155: 111-120.
[14]LI Rongpeng, ZHANG Jianliang, WANG Guangwei, et al.Study on CO2 gasification reactivity of biomass char derived from high-temperature rapid pyrolysis[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 121: 1022-1031.
[15]张乾, 向欣宁, 梁丽彤, 等.热重分析煤焦恒温气化过程中气体切换影响[J]. 化工进展, 2022(1): 1000-6613.（ZHANG Qian, XIANG Xinning, LIANG Litong, et al. Gas switch effect on the isothermal gasification reaction of coal char in thermogravimetric analyser[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022(1): 1000-6613.）
[16]BRUNAUER S, EMMETT P H, TELLER E.Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers[J].Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1938, 60(2):309-319
[17]吴诗勇, 吴幼青, 顾菁, 等.高温煅烧条件下石油焦和沥青焦的物理结构及其气化特性[J].石油学报石油加工, 2009, 25(2):258-265
[18]XU Kai, HU Song, SU Sheng, et al.Study on char surface active sites and their relationship to gasification reactivity[J].Energy and fuels, 2012, 27(1):118-125
[19]LU L, SAHAJWALLA V, KONG C, et al.Quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis and its application to various coals[J].Carbon, 2001, 39(12):1821-1833
[20]ZHANG Yude, KANG Xiaojuan, TAN Jinlong, et al.Influence of calcination and acidification on structural characterization of Anyang anthracites[J].Energy and fuels, 2013, 27(11):7191-7197
[21]MALEKSHAHIAN M, HILL J M.Effect of pyrolysis and CO2 gasification pressure on the surface area and pore size distribution of petroleum coke[J].Energy and fuels, 2011, 25(11):5250-5256
[22]XU Chaofen, HU Song, XIANG Jun, et al.Interaction and kinetic analysis for coal and biomass co-gasification by TG-FTIR[J]. Bioresource technology, 2014, 154: 313-321.
[23]DIAO Rui, YUAN Xinhua, SUN Mengchao, et al.Thermogravimetric investigation on the effect of reaction temperature and blend ratio on co-gasification characteristics of pyrolytic oil distillation residue with biochar[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 309: 123360.
[24]JIN Hui, FAN Chao, WEI Wenwen, et al.Evolution of pore structure and produced gases of Zhundong coal particle during gasification in supercritical water[J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2018, 136: 102-109.
[25]WANG Daqian, YANG Haiping, WU Yang, et al.Evolution of pore structure and fractal characteristics of coal char during coal gasification[J].Journal of the Energy Institute, 2020, 93(5):1999-2005
[26]ZHANG Rui, CHEN Yifan, LEI Kai, et al.The effects of specific surface area and ash on char gasification mechanisms in the mixture of H2O, CO2, H2 and CO[J]. Fuel, 2017, 209: 109-116.
[27]谢克昌.煤的结构与反应性[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002: 293-294.
[28]MIURA K, HASHIMOTO K, SILVESTON P L.Factors affecting the reactivity of coal chars during gasification,and indices representing reactivity[J].Fuel, 1989, 68(11):1461-1475
[29]MOLINA A, MONTOYA A, MONDRAGóN F.CO2 strong chemisorption as an estimate of coal char gasification reactivity[J].Fuel, 1999, 78(8):971-977
[30]JING Xuliang, WANG Zhiqing, ZHANG Qian, et al.Experimental and kinetic investigations of CO2 gasification of fine chars separated from a pilot-scale fluidized-bed gasifier[J].Energy and fuels, 2013, 27(5):2422-2430
[31]MACHADO A D S, MEXIAS A S, VILELA A C F, et al.Study of coal, char and coke fines structures and their proportions in the off-gas blast furnace samples by X-ray diffraction[J]. Fuel, 2013, 114: 224-228.
[32]LI Yang, YANG Haiping, HU Junhao, et al.Effect of catalysts on the reactivity and structure evolution of char in petroleum coke steam gasification[J]. Fuel, 2014, 117: 1174-1180.
[33]黄胜.石油焦的理化性质及其催化气化反应特性研究[D]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2013.
[34]ZHANG Qian, LI Qingfeng, ZHANG Linxian, et al.Preliminary study on co-gasification behavior of deoiled asphalt with coal and biomass[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 132: 426-434.
[35]JING Xuliang, WANG Zhiqing, ZHANG Qian, et al.Evaluation of CO2 gasification reactivity of different coal rank chars by physicochemical properties[J]. Energy and Fuels, 2013, 27: 7287-7293.
[36]CHANG Qinghua, GAO Rui, GAO Ming, et al.Experimental analysis of the evolution of soot structure during CO2 gasification[J]. Fuel, 2020, 265: 116699.
[37]TUINSTRA F, KOENING J L.Raman Spectrum of Graphite[J].The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1970, 53(3):1126-30
[38]柳晓飞, 尤静林, 王媛媛, 等.澳大利亚烟煤热解的拉曼光谱研究[J].燃料化学学报, 2014, 42(3):270-276