DOI:
矿床地质:2010,Vol.>>Issue(1):9-23

华南钨和锡大规模成矿作用的差异及其原因初探
内生金属矿床成矿机制研究国家重点实验室,南京大学地球科学与工程学院
A tentative discussion on differences between large-scale tungsten and tin mineralizations in South China
()
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献

摘要点击次数: 5485   全文下载次数: 4637   点此下载全文
        
中文摘要:钨和锡都是中国的优势矿产资源,主要分布在华南尤其是南岭及其邻近地区,关系密切、相互共生,但两者之间仍然存在着很明显的差异。在空间分布上表现为东钨西锡:南岭东段,钨矿密集产出;中段,钨锡并重,但锡矿化明显增强;西段则为大规模锡成矿作用。在成矿时代上,钨和锡都以160~150 Ma为成矿高峰期,但锡还有雪峰期、印支期成矿作用,以及燕山晚期的又一个成矿高峰期。锡的成矿作用及与其相关的花岗岩类显示出与地幔物质有较为密切的关系,因此,锡的大规模成矿作用或发生在有地幔物质参与的“十-杭带”附近,或发生在地壳强烈拉张的燕山晚期。钨与锡在元素地球化学性质上的差异,以及华南东、西两部分在构造背景、沉积物特征和岩浆活动等方面的差异,是造成华南钨与锡大规模成矿作用差异的根本原因。
中文关键词:地质学      大规模成矿作用  差异  华南
Abstract:Both tungsten and tin are the most prevailing mineral resources in China. Large-scale tungsten and tin mineralizations took place mostly in South China, especially in the Nanling Mountains and the neighboring areas. The two elements are very closely related to and accompanied with each other and always occur together in most ore deposits. However, differences do exist between tungsten and tin mineralizations in many aspects. Spatial distribution shows that the eastern sector of the Nanling Mountains is characterized by strong and dense W mineralization, while Sn mineralization becomes stronger westwards. China's two largest Sn ore deposits are distributed in the western margin of the South China fold system. Although both tungsten and tin mineralizations have the same highest ore-forming epoch of 160~150 Ma, the tin mineralization is spanned from the late Xuefeng Period (~800 Ma) to Late Yanshanian Movement (80 Ma). The Late Yanshanian Movement is in fact another highlight of tin mineralization. The tin-bearing granite and tin mineralization show much closer relationship with the participation of mantle derived materials than tungsten mineralization. Therefore, the large-scale tin mineralization took place either near the so-called Shi-Hang Zone where longterm deep faulting was activated and A-type granites were emplaced or during the Late Yanshanian period when the South China continent was in a strong tensional geodynamic environment. The principal factors responsible for these differences may include the diversity of geochemical properties between the two elements and the differences in tectonic backgrounds, stratigraphic characteristics and magmatic activities between the eastern part and the western part of South China.
文章编号:    
中图分类号:     
文献标志码:

基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2007CB411404)及国家自然科学基金重点项目(40730423)
引用文本:
华仁民,李光来,张文兰,胡东泉,陈培荣,陈卫锋,王旭东.2010.华南钨和锡大规模成矿作用的差异及其原因初探[J].矿床地质,29(1):9~23
.2010.A tentative discussion on differences between large-scale tungsten and tin mineralizations in South China [J].Mineral Deposits29(1):9~23
图/表
您是第241585412位访问者  京ICP备05032737号-5  京公网 安备110102004559
版权所有:《矿床地质》编辑部
主管单位:中国科学技术协会 主办单位:中国地质学会矿床地质专业委员会 中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所
地  址: 北京市百万庄大街26号 邮编:100037 电话:010-68327284;010-68999546 E-mail: minerald@vip.163.com
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计 
手机扫一扫